IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/pojard/338748.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer Purchasing Intention and Behaviour Toward Chicken Meat in Sulaymaniyah City: Empirical Evidence from a Field Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Neima, Hemin Abuakir
  • Sirwan, Kawan
  • Hameed, Khansa

Abstract

Consumer behavioural study is an important determinant factor in food marketing for the value chain of agribusiness and poultry production development strategies. The aims of this study were to determine the consumer purchasing behavioural intention of chicken meat within the application of planned behavioural control toward the food purchasing framework developed by Ajzen (2015). This study was carried out in Sulaymaniyah city, Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI). The data were collected via a structured questionnaire form indicating the respondents’ choice and decision-making process while purchasing chicken meat and the reasons behind its consumption based on a 5-point Likert Scale. The major questions were focused on purchasing places and preferred chicken meat types and cuts and consumption and purchasing frequency, as well as determining the effectors for the purchasing decision of the respondents and the TPB’s three constructs: attitude (ATT), subjective norm (SN) and perceived behavioural control (PBC) that form a behavioural intention (BI). The findings from this study showed a positive consumer attitude and perceived behavioural control (p-value = 0.000, β = 0.469; p-value = 0.000, β = 0.704, respectively) towards chicken meat purchase and consumption in Sulaymaniyah city. However, the subjective norms had negative significant influences (p-value = 0.000, β = –0.261) compared to ATT and PBC of consumers in purchasing and consuming chicken meat. It was also found that 89.4% of the respondents consume chicken at home once a week or more. This study renders valuable guidance for further development in the agribusiness sector and marketing strategies in the KRI.

Suggested Citation

  • Neima, Hemin Abuakir & Sirwan, Kawan & Hameed, Khansa, 2023. "Consumer Purchasing Intention and Behaviour Toward Chicken Meat in Sulaymaniyah City: Empirical Evidence from a Field Survey," Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland, vol. 68(2).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pojard:338748
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/338748/files/268_169.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shuai Yang & Lei Li & Jiemin Zhang, 2018. "Understanding Consumers’ Sustainable Consumption Intention at China’s Double-11 Online Shopping Festival: An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elena Druică & Rodica Ianole-Călin & Andreea-Ionela Puiu, 2023. "When Less Is More: Understanding the Adoption of a Minimalist Lifestyle Using the Theory of Planned Behavior," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Xiaoyu Xu & Luyao Wang & Kai Zhao, 2020. "Exploring Determinants of Consumers’ Platform Usage in “Double Eleven” Shopping Carnival in China: Cognition and Emotion from an Integrated Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Amina Rizwan & Faisal Mustafa, 2022. "Fintech Attaining Sustainable Development: An Investor Perspective of Crowdfunding Platforms in a Developing Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Jing Zhu & Muhammad Awais Shakir Goraya & Yu Cai, 2018. "Retailer–Consumer Sustainable Business Environment: How Consumers’ Perceived Benefits Are Translated by the Addition of New Retail Channels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, August.
    5. Qing He & Haiyang Zhao & Lin Shen & Liuqun Dong & Ye Cheng & Ke Xu, 2019. "Factors Influencing Residents’ Intention toward Green Retrofitting of Existing Residential Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-23, August.
    6. Woo-Hyuk Kim & Kyung-Sook Kim, 2018. "Pro-Environmental Intentions among Food Festival Attendees: An Application of the Value-Belief-Norm Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-13, October.
    7. Han-Shen Chen & Chia-Hsing Liang & Shu-Yi Liao & Hung-Yu Kuo, 2020. "Consumer Attitudes and Purchase Intentions toward Food Delivery Platform Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Lenka Štofejová & Štefan Kráľ & Richard Fedorko & Radovan Bačík & Mária Tomášová, 2023. "Sustainability and Consumer Behavior in Electronic Commerce," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-16, November.
    9. Jinrong Liu & Qi Xu, 2020. "Joint Decision on Pricing and Ordering for Omnichannel BOPS Retailers: Considering Online Returns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, February.
    10. Krishna Moorthy & Nik Mohamad Zaki Nik Salleh & Ang Xin Jie & Chan Shu Yi & Lau Shin Wei & Loo Yian Bing & Yee Zhao Ying, 2021. "Use of Social Media in Planning Domestic Holidays: A Study on Malaysian Millennials," Millennial Asia, , vol. 12(1), pages 35-56, April.
    11. Min Tian & Bo Pu & Yini Chen & Zhian Zhu, 2019. "Consumer’s Waste Classification Intention in China: An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Lidia Alexa & Andreea Apetrei & Juan Sapena, 2021. "The COVID-19 Lockdown Effect on the Intention to Purchase Sustainable Brands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, March.
    13. Iulia C. Muresan & Rezhen Harun & Felix H. Arion & Anca Monica Brata & Ioan Aurel Chereches & Gabriela O. Chiciudean & Diana E. Dumitras & Camelia F. Oroian & Olivia Paula Tirpe, 2021. "Consumers’ Attitude towards Sustainable Food Consumption during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Romania," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, October.
    14. Jianfang Liang & Jingjun Li & Qinyuan Lei, 2022. "Exploring the Influence of Environmental Values on Green Consumption Behavior of Apparel: A Chain Multiple Mediation Model among Chinese Generation Z," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-26, October.
    15. Samah Ibnou-Laaroussi & Husam Rjoub & Wing-Keung Wong, 2020. "Sustainability of Green Tourism among International Tourists and Its Influence on the Achievement of Green Environment: Evidence from North Cyprus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-24, July.
    16. Agu Godswill Agu & Samuel G. Etuk & Nnamdi O. Madichie, 2022. "Exploring the Role of Sustainability-Oriented Marketing Education in Promoting Consciousness for Sustainable Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, July.
    17. Othmane Aride & Maria-del-Mar Pàmies-Pallisé, 2019. "From Values to Behavior: Proposition of an Integrating Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-19, November.
    18. Nabil Hasan Al-Kumaim & Muhammad Salman Shabbir & Salman Alfarisi & Siti Hasnah Hassan & Abdulsalam K. Alhazmi & Sanil S. Hishan & Samer Al-Shami & Nadhmi A. Gazem & Fathey Mohammed & Hussein Mohammed, 2021. "Fostering a Clean and Sustainable Environment through Green Product Purchasing Behavior: Insights from Malaysian Consumers’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    19. Swati Garg & Asad Ahmad & Dag Øivind Madsen & Shahab Saquib Sohail, 2023. "Sustainable Behavior with Respect to Managing E-Wastes: Factors Influencing E-Waste Management among Young Consumers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pojard:338748. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.jard.edu.pl/en/main .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.