IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/phajad/404801.html

Development of the Malaysian Dairy Goat Value Chain: Farm-to-Glass and Productivity Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Kamarubahrin, Aimi Fadzirul
  • Haris, Asmaddy

Abstract

This study provides a comprehensive overview of Malaysia’s dairy goat industry from a supply chain perspective, focusing on productivity performance and value chain integration. Despite Malaysia’s favorable agroclimatic conditions, the national goat population remains small, totaling 439,667 heads in 2021, with approximately half being dairy goats. Using a systematic document review approach, the study synthesized data from government reports, industry statistics, and academic literature to assess production efficiency and market development. The analysis uses a farm productivity lens and a value-chain (i.e., “farm-to-glass”) lens in assessing the industry. The former examines resource-use efficiency across different operational scales, while the latter highlights gaps in processing, distribution, and retail linkages. Findings reveal that while Malaysia possesses strong potential for dairy goat expansion, the industry remains constrained by fragmented value chains, limited infrastructure, and uneven productivity levels. Strengthening collaboration among government, the private sector, and smallholders is essential to improve productivity, enhance market connectivity, and promote sustainable growth. The study aligns with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 2 (Zero Hunger), SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth), and SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production) by supporting sustainable livestock management and enhancing food security.

Suggested Citation

  • Kamarubahrin, Aimi Fadzirul & Haris, Asmaddy, 2026. "Development of the Malaysian Dairy Goat Value Chain: Farm-to-Glass and Productivity Perspectives," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA), vol. 23(1), June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:phajad:404801
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404801
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404801/files/Rev%202_Aimi_AJAD23.1_June2026.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.404801?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brown, Alessio J.G. & Fraikin, Anne-Lore, 2022. "The old-age pension household replacement rate in Belgium," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 23(C).
    2. Muhammad Ahmar & Fahad Ali & Yuexiang Jiang & Mamdooh Alwetaishi & Sherif S. M. Ghoneim, 2022. "Households’ Energy Choices in Rural Pakistan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Dongyang Zhang & Xinxin Ma & Jun Zhang & Quheng Deng, 2022. "Household Consumption and Manufactural Industrial Upgrading," Springer Books, in: Xinxin Ma & Cheng Tang (ed.), Growth Mechanisms and Sustainable Development of the Chinese Economy, chapter 0, pages 281-303, Springer.
    4. Florian Hofmann & Melanie Jaeger‐Erben, 2020. "Organizational transition management of circular business model innovations," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2770-2788, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Franciele Mendonça Ferreira & Anelise Leal Vieira Cubas & Caroline Conteratto & Ana Regina de Aguiar Dutra & Marina de Medeiros Machado, 2026. "Multidimensional value co-creation at the BoP: circular business model in urban recycling ecosystems," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 1-11, March.
    2. Shaheera Banu Z & V. VIMALA, 2024. "Integration of ESG principles: An initiative for transformation from Linear Economy to Circular Economy," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(2(639), S), pages 183-196, Summer.
    3. Graziela Darla Araujo Galvão & Steve Evans & Paulo Sergio Scoleze Ferrer & Marly Monteiro de Carvalho, 2022. "Circular business model: Breaking down barriers towards sustainable development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1504-1524, May.
    4. Sapta Suhardono & Chun-Hung Lee & I Wayan Koko Suryawan, 2025. "Influence of adaptive management indicators on willingness to adapt to single-use plastic ban," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 27(3), pages 431-454, July.
    5. Ahmad, Farhan & Bask, Anu & Laari, Sini & Robinson, Craig V., 2023. "Business management perspectives on the circular economy: Present state and future directions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    6. Carlos Poblete & Felipe Rifo & Joana Huaman, 2021. "The Role of Circular Business Modeling in the Entrepreneurial Identity-Construction Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-25, December.
    7. Andreza Rodrigues de Araujo & Rodrigo Marques de Almeida Guerra & David Lorenzi Junior & Jordana Marques Kneipp & Luísa Margarida Cagica Carvalho, 2026. "Circular and Sustainable Business Model Innovation: Formulating an Integrated Concept Through A Systematic Literature Review," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 1-30, April.
    8. MingCan JI & Xing Zhang, 2024. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Assessing the Impacts and Mechanisms of Green Bond Financing on the Enhancement of Green Management and Technological Innovation in Environmental Conservation Enterprises," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 12709-12750, September.
    9. Ingvild Reine Assmann & Francesco Rosati & Sandra Naomi Morioka, 2023. "Determinants of circular business model adoption—A systematic literature review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 6008-6028, December.
    10. Jenni Kaipainen & Leena Aarikka‐Stenroos, 2022. "How to renew business strategy to achieve sustainability and circularity? A process model of strategic development in incumbent technology companies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 1947-1963, July.
    11. Anastasia A. Katou & Dimitrios Kafetzopoulos & Anastasia Vayona, 2023. "Investigating the Serially Mediating Mechanisms of Organizational Ambidexterity and the Circular Economy in the Relationship between Ambidextrous Leadership and Sustainability Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Usama Awan & Robert Sroufe & Muhammad Shahbaz, 2021. "Industry 4.0 and the circular economy: A literature review and recommendations for future research," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 2038-2060, May.
    13. J. Rincón-Moreno & M. Ormazábal & C. Jaca, 2022. "Stakeholder Perspectives in Transitioning to a Local Circular Economy: a Case Study in Spain," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 693-711, June.
    14. Elizaveta Averina & Johan Frishammar & Vinit Parida, 2022. "Assessing sustainability opportunities for circular business models," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1464-1487, May.
    15. Bushra Mushtaq & Anthony Halog & Shahzad Hussain, 2026. "Integrating Circular Economy and Industrial Green Total Factor Productivity: a CIGTFP Model for Industrial Sustainable Development and Environmental Management," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 1-22, April.
    16. Anja Eisenreich & Johann Füller & Martin Stuchtey, 2021. "Circular Project Selection: How Companies Can Evaluate Circular Innovation Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-30, November.
    17. ShivamKrishn Agrawal & Vijay Kumar Jain & Hemraj Verma, 2025. "Navigating the Circular Transition: The Pivotal Role of Dynamic Capabilities in Enabling Circular Business Models and Firm Performance," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 751-775, April.
    18. Jing Shao & Cedric Aneye & Alyona Kharitonova & Wei Fang, 2023. "Essential innovation capability of producer‐service enterprises towards circular business model: Motivators and barriers," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4548-4567, November.
    19. Assunta Di Vaio & Sohail Hasan & Rosa Palladino & Rohail Hassan, 2023. "The transition towards circular economy and waste within accounting and accountability models: a systematic literature review and conceptual framework," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 734-810, January.
    20. Ahmar, Muhammad & Ali, Fahad & He, Chengying & Jiang, Yuexiang, 2025. "Understanding the role of socio-economic, demographic, environmental, infrastructural, and institutional attributes in the uptake of biogas technology in Pakistan: Proposing and implementing a novel step-wise framework," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:phajad:404801. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/searcph.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.