Author
Listed:
- Abdulsalam, R. Y.
- Goni, M.,
- Apeh, C. C.
- Kabeer, M. Y.
Abstract
Livelihood studies have demonstrated the reliance of communities on available capital bases for their survival. The concept of livelihood extends beyond mere economic transactions to include other equally important dimensions that impact people’s ability to sustain themselves and thrive. For fishing communities, their livelihoods are deeply connected to their natural resource endowments. With a focus on rural Nigeria as a case study, an assessment of livelihood status of fishing households is presented. The study collected cross-sectional data from 134 households using questionnaire for the 2023 fishing season. To assess their livelihood status, an index was developed on the basis of five components namely financial, human, physical, natural and social. Results of the analysis showed an average livelihood status index value of 0.53 and that the respondents were concentrated (67.16%) in the medium livelihood category. A breakdown showed that natural (0.77) and social (0.67) capitals were the two most endowed capital with physical capital (0.30) being the least. Furthermore, a Tobit regression analysis showed that membership to an association, level of educational attainment and household size significantly influenced livelihood status of the studied households. The study revealed an unbalanced livelihood situation in the study area and has suggested policies for strengthening the development of fishing household livelihood capitals through improvement in human assets by introducing evening classes for school and free education so as to encourage turnout and educate the fishermen on sustainable fishing practices that can improve their incomes and elevate their financial capital
Suggested Citation
Abdulsalam, R. Y. & Goni, M., & Apeh, C. C. & Kabeer, M. Y., 2023.
"An Application of Sustainable Livelihood Approach to Fishing Households in Jigawa State, Nigeria,"
Nigerian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Nigerian Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 13(1), October.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:naaenj:356884
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.356884
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:naaenj:356884. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/naaeeea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.