IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/joagco/46207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Socioeconomic and Technical Characteristics of New England Dairy Cooperative Members and Nonmembers

Author

Listed:
  • Bravo-Ureta, Boris E.
  • Lee, Tsoung-Chao

Abstract

This paper compares socioeconomic and technical characteristics of dairy cooperative members and nonmembers based on a sample of New England dairy herd improvement association participants. Descriptive statistics indicate there is a little difference between the two groups. A high proportion of members stated cooperatives were helpful primarily because they provide a safe or guaranteed market. Estimates of a Cobb0Douglas production function suggest membership in one specific cooperative was positively and significantly associated with average farm efficiency. Results of a logit analysis indicate the probability of being a cooperative member was positively related to extension contracts and negatively related to output per cow per farm.

Suggested Citation

  • Bravo-Ureta, Boris E. & Lee, Tsoung-Chao, 1988. "Socioeconomic and Technical Characteristics of New England Dairy Cooperative Members and Nonmembers," Journal of Agricultural Cooperation, National Council of Farmer Cooperatives, vol. 3, pages 1-16.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:joagco:46207
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.46207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/46207/files/Volume%203%20Article%202.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.46207?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li Feng & Anna Friis & Jerker Nilsson, 2016. "Social Capital among Members in Grain Marketing Cooperatives of Different Sizes," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 113-126, January.
    2. Shunxiang Wu & Stephen Devadoss & Yaochi Lu, 2003. "Estimation and decomposition of technical efficiency for sugarbeet farms," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 471-484.
    3. Mishra, Ashok K. & Tegegne, Fisseha & Sandretto, Carmen L., 2004. "The Impact of Participation in Cooperatives on the Success of Small Farms," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 22(1), pages 1-18.
    4. Nillson, J. & Hendrikse, G.W.J., 2009. "Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft in Cooperatives," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2009-059-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    5. Peter Österberg & Jerker Nilsson, 2009. "Members' perception of their participation in the governance of cooperatives: the key to trust and commitment in agricultural cooperatives," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(2), pages 181-197.
    6. Morfi, Chrysa & Ollila, Petri & Nilsson, Jerker & Surry, Yves & Feng, Li & Karantininis, Konstantinos, 2014. "The switching behaviour of Finnish co-operative members in relation to their commitment and loyalty," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182774, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Munch, Daniel M. & Schmit, Todd M. & Severson, Roberta M., 2020. "A Descriptive Analysis of Milk Pricing Attribute Values for Cooperative and Independent Milk Handlers in New York State," Journal of Cooperatives, NCERA-210, vol. 35.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:joagco:46207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/daksuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.