IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/joaaec/355622.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Economic Model of Student Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Barkley, Andrew
  • Coffey, Brian K.

Abstract

We develop a dynamic economic model based on contemporary understanding of learning and motivation. The model and resulting comparative static analysis show the instructor's role in providing a productive learning environment. Instructors should set the complexity of course assignments and assessments to be consistent with student preparedness. Learning is enhanced when the rate of change in challenge is based on the rate of change of how rapidly students are learning. Instructors steer students toward a productive trajectory with tasks that cause students to work hard and by consistently providing feedback and fostering a culture of learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Barkley, Andrew & Coffey, Brian K., 2018. "An Economic Model of Student Learning," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 50(4), June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:joaaec:355622
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.355622
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/355622/files/an-economic-model-of-student-learning.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.355622?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William E. Becker & William J. Baumol (ed.), 1995. "Assessing Educational Practices: The Contribution of Economics," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262023989, December.
    2. Michael E. Wetzstein, 1988. "An Organonic and Modern Problems Approach for Teaching Agricultural Economics Principles," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 70(1), pages 63-68.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arnaud Chevalier & Peter Dolton, 2004. "The Labour Market for Teachers," Working Papers 200411, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
    2. Martín Gonzales-Eiras & Dirk Niepelt, 2007. "Population Ageing, Government Budgets, and Productivity Growth in Politico-Economic Equilibrium," Working Papers 07.05, Swiss National Bank, Study Center Gerzensee.
    3. Randall E. Westgren & Kerry K. Litzenberg, 1989. "Designing agribusiness capstone courses: Overt and covert teaching strategies," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 5(4), pages 361-366.
    4. Byoung Uk Kang & Jin-Mo Kim & Oded Palmon & Zhaodong Zhong, 2020. "Are college education and job experience complements or substitutes? Evidence from hedge fund portfolio performance," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 54(4), pages 1247-1278, May.
    5. Snarr, Hal W. & Gold, Steven C., 2005. "The design and use of macroeconomics simulation using maple software: A pilot study," MPRA Paper 37061, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Nick Adnett, "undated". "Competition in the School Curriculum: the economic and policy context in the UK," Working Papers 001, Staffordshire University, Business School.
    7. Norbert L.W. Wilson & Robert G. Nelson, 2009. "A Laboratory Science Approach to Teaching in the Agricultural Economics Curriculum," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 31(2), pages 331-343.
    8. Saavedra, Juan Esteban, 2012. "Resource constraints and educational attainment in developing countries: Colombia 1945–2005," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 80-91.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:joaaec:355622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.