IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jlcoop/46417.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Producer Perceptions of Hog Marketing Cooperatives

Author

Listed:
  • Wachenheim, Cheryl J.
  • deHillerin, Regis
  • Dumler, Mike

Abstract

A survey instrument was developed to elicit information useful in characterizing the membership of hog marketing cooperatives and to identify benefits and costs expected and perceived by members. An empirical application investigates the role of marketing cooperatives in the Illinois pork industry. Producers in general agreed there were benefits of membership in a hog marketing cooperative although perceptions of the nature and extent of these benefits varied. Important differences were identified between perceptions of producers with small operations and those held by other producers.

Suggested Citation

  • Wachenheim, Cheryl J. & deHillerin, Regis & Dumler, Mike, 2001. "Producer Perceptions of Hog Marketing Cooperatives," Journal of Cooperatives, NCERA-210, vol. 16, pages 1-21.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:jlcoop:46417
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.46417
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/46417/files/Volume%2016%20Article%203.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.46417?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Theuvsen, Ludwig & Franz, Annabell, 2007. "The Role and Success Factors of Livestock Trading Cooperatives: Lessons from German Pork Production," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 10(3), pages 1-23.
    2. Karen L. DeLong & Kimberly L. Jensen & Andrew P. Griffith & Elizabeth McLeod, 2019. "Beef cattle farmers’ marketing preferences for selling local beef," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(3), pages 343-357, July.
    3. Jensen, Kimberly L. & English, Burton C. & Clark, Christopher D. & Menard, R. Jamey, 2011. "Preferences for Marketing Arrangements by Potential Switchgrass Growers," Journal of Cooperatives, NCERA-210, vol. 25, pages 1-28.
    4. Bensemann, Jessica & Shadbolt, Nicola, 2015. "Farmers’ Choice of Marketing Strategy: A Study of New Zealand Lamb Producers," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 18(3), pages 1-33, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Marketing;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlcoop:46417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/daksuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.