IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/iepwbj/335116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adaptability of Quality of Life in Rural Serbia to the Needs of Young People: Perceptions of Agricultural Extension Officers

Author

Listed:
  • Paraušić, Vesna

Abstract

High quality of life in rural areas represents the key prerequisite for sustainable rural development. In addition to ensuring that the young will remain in these areas, it also indicates rural vitality and plays a key role in rural development policies and local development strategies in all countries. The aim of this article was to examine the extent to which the quality of life in rural Serbia was adapted to the needs of young people in order to ensure their stay in rural areas. Using a semi-structured questionnaire and an online and telephone survey, the author asked 118 agricultural extension officers from all agricultural extension services in Serbia to express their opinions on this issue. The agricultural extension officers evaluated quality of rural life and its adaptability to the needs of the young using a Likert scale ranging from 1 (not adapted) to 5 (highly adapted). The average score for Serbia was 2.4, which indicates that quality of life is slightly adapted to the needs of the young. Quality of life was rated higher (moderately adapted) only in the area of Belgrade, while in the other areas it had the average values for Serbia (slightly adapted). Despite the significant differences between the regions regarding the achieved level of economic development, the Kruskal-Wallis test showed that these differences did not have an influence on the agricultural extension officers’ evaluation of the analyzed variable (p=0.239).

Suggested Citation

  • Paraušić, Vesna, 2023. "Adaptability of Quality of Life in Rural Serbia to the Needs of Young People: Perceptions of Agricultural Extension Officers," Western Balkan Journal of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (WBJAERD), Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 5(1), June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:iepwbj:335116
    DOI: 10.5937/WBJAE2301057P
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/335116/files/WBJAERD%201-2023%20p57-72.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5937/WBJAE2301057P?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fabio Boncinelli & Gabriele Pagnotta & Francesco Riccioli & Leonardo Casini, 2015. "The Determinants Of Quality Of Life In Rural Areas From A Geographic Perspective: The Case Of Tuscany," Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(2), pages 104-117, July.
    2. Bogdanov, Natalija & Moslavac, Nenad, 2007. "Needs Assessment Analysis of Small Rural Households in Serbia," 100th Seminar, June 21-23, 2007, Novi Sad, Serbia and Montenegro 162346, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boncinelli, Fabio & Bartolini, Fabio & Casini, Leonardo, 2018. "Structural factors of labour allocation for farm diversification activities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 204-212.
    2. Fagarazzi, C. & Fratini, R. & Montanino, M. & Riccioli, F., 2018. "The economic value of fire damages in Tuscan agroforestry areas," 2018 Seventh AIEAA Conference, June 14-15, Conegliano, Italy 275658, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA).
    3. František Petrovič & František Murgaš, 2021. "Description Relationship between Urban Space and Quality of Urban Life. A Geographical Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Jing Zhang & Bingbing Huang & Xinming Chen & Congmou Zhu & Muye Gan, 2022. "Multidimensional Evaluation of the Quality of Rural Life Using Big Data from the Perspective of Common Prosperity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-21, October.
    5. Evgenia Anastasiou & Stella Manika & Konstantina Ragazou & Ioannis Katsios, 2021. "Territorial and Human Geography Challenges: How Can Smart Villages Support Rural Development and Population Inclusion?," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, May.
    6. Viccaro, Mauro & Romano, Severino & Prete, Carmelina & Cozzi, Mario, 2021. "Rural planning? An integrated dynamic model for assessing quality of life at a local scale," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    7. Brambert Patryk & Kiniorska Iwona, 2018. "Changes in the Standard of Living in Rural Population of Poland in the Period of the Eu Membership," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 10(2), pages 263-279, June.
    8. Marina Vladimirovna Muravyova, 2018. "Socio-Economic and Demographic Motivators of the Life Quality of Rural Population in the Russian Federation," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 211-214:3.
    9. Jakub Straka & Marcela Tuzová, 2016. "Factors Affecting Development of Rural Areas in the Czech Republic: a Literature Review," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 64(6), pages 2141-2150.
    10. Bogdanov, Natalija, 2014. "The development of support for less favoured areas and deprivileged regions: challenge of agricultural policy in Serbia," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 186679, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Myrzaliyev, Borash S. & Chetin, Samet & Azretbergenova, Gulmira Zh., 2022. "Improving the Evaluation of the Competitive Ability of the National Market of Meat and Meat Products of Kazakhstan," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 13(03), September.
    12. Leonardo Casini & Fabio Boncinelli & Caterina Contini & Francesca Gerini & Gabriele Scozzafava, 2019. "A Multicriteria Approach for Well-Being Assessment in Rural Areas," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 143(1), pages 411-432, May.
    13. Veronika Zavratnik & Andrej Kos & Emilija Stojmenova Duh, 2018. "Smart Villages: Comprehensive Review of Initiatives and Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, July.
    14. Riccardo Beltramo & Giovanni Peira & Giacomo Pasino & Alessandro Bonadonna, 2024. "Quality of Life in Rural Areas: A Set of Indicators for Improving Wellbeing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-20, February.
    15. Bogdanov, Natalija & Janković, Dejan, 2013. "Territorial Capital Of Rural Areas: An Example Of Analysis Of The Potential For Rural Tourism Development In Serbia," Agri-Food Sector in Serbia: State and Challenges, Serbian Association of Agricultural Economists, number 157552 edited by Škorić, Dragan & Tomić, Danilo & Popović, Vesna, December.
    16. Dudzińska, Małgorzata & Bacior, Stanisław & Prus, Barbara, 2018. "Considering the level of socio-economic development of rural areas in the context of infrastructural and traditional consolidations in Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 759-773.
    17. Borodina Tatiana & Savchenko Alexander, 2018. "Rural Settlements on Peatlands in Moscow Region: Impact of Economic Activities and Climate Changes on Quality of Life," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 10(3), pages 462-481, September.
    18. Čikić Jovana & Petrović Marica, 2015. "Rural Families and Households in Post-Socialist Transition: Serbian Experience," Eastern European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 21(1), pages 35-62, December.
    19. Francesco Riccioli & Roberto Fratini & Fabio Boncinelli, 2021. "The Impacts in Real Estate of Landscape Values: Evidence from Tuscany (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iepwbj:335116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iepbgyu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.