IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/bdbjaf/200177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis Of Total Factor Productivity Of Wheat In Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Karim, Md. Rezaul
  • Talukder, Rezaul Karim

Abstract

The study dealt with the total wheat scenario in terms of productivity growth in Bangladesh covering the period from 1980 to 2006. The 26 years of wheat production period was divided iaio three consecutive sub periods: period I (1980 to 1990), period II (1991 to 2000) and period III (2001 to 2006). Technological breakthrough was started from the mid of the 1" period and continued up to the end of the 2°d period. The study revealed that the growth rate of inputs used was higher in the 2nd period than in the 1S` period. The growth rate of output price was always lower than that of input prices. In spite of the lowest partial factor productivity indices of all the input, the total factor productivity indices were highest in the 2nd period. The 28 years' (1972-73 to 1999-00) mean rainfall and temperature did not favour the farmers to produce more wheat. In aggregate sense, the wheat production in the 2"d period was the most cost effective. The growth rate of yield was found to be 0.2 percent during the study period. Of the period, only 2nd period was considered as the golden revolutionary period in the history of wheat in Bangladesh since 1980. Technological change in wheat production in the golden revolutionary period has relatively benefited consumers more than producers. Research, mechanization and market are the most important sources of growth in total factor productivity. The extent of annual fluctuation of wheat productivity will have to be minimized by more efficient use of inputs.

Suggested Citation

  • Karim, Md. Rezaul & Talukder, Rezaul Karim, 2008. "Analysis Of Total Factor Productivity Of Wheat In Bangladesh," Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Economics, Bangladesh Agricultural University, vol. 31(1-2), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:bdbjaf:200177
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.200177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/200177/files/Article_01%20Vol-XXXI.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.200177?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laurits R. Christensen, 1975. "Concepts and Measurement of Agricultural Productivity," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 57(5), pages 910-915.
    2. Diewert, W. E., 1976. "Exact and superlative index numbers," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 115-145, May.
    3. Mark W. Rosegrant & Robert E. Evenson, 1993. "Agricultural Productivity Growth in Pakistan and India: A Comparative Analysis," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 32(4), pages 433-451.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Trueblood, Michael A., 1994. "An Annotated Bibliography Of Selected Productivity Literature," Staff Papers 13580, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    2. Bryce Stewart & Terrence Veeman & James Unterschultz, 2009. "Crops and Livestock Productivity Growth in the Prairies: The Impacts of Technical Change and Scale," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 57(3), pages 379-394, September.
    3. Bottomley, Paul & Ozanne, Adam & Thirtle, Colin, 1988. "A Total Factor Productivity Index for U.K. Agriculture 1967-87," Manchester Working Papers in Agricultural Economics 232799, University of Manchester, School of Economics, Agricultural Economics Department.
    4. Kumar, Praduman & Mittal, Surabhi, 2006. "Agricultural Productivity Trends in India: Sustainability Issues," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 19(Conferenc).
    5. Kumar, Praduman & Dey, Madan Mohan & Paraguas, Ferdinand J., 2006. "Fish Supply Projections by Production Environments and Species Types in India," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 19(2), July.
    6. Gavian, Sarah & Ehui, Simeon, 1999. "Measuring the production efficiency of alternative land tenure contracts in a mixed crop-livestock system in Ethiopia," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 37-49, January.
    7. Fantino, Alberto A. & Weeman, Terrence S., 1997. "The Choice of Index Numbers in Measuring Agricultural Productivity: A Canadian Empirical Case Study," 1997 Occasional Paper Series No. 7 198061, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Thirtle, Colin, 1986. "Problems in the Definition and Measurement of Technical Change and Productivity Growth in the U.K. Agricultural Sector," Manchester Working Papers in Agricultural Economics 232790, University of Manchester, School of Economics, Agricultural Economics Department.
    9. Voigt, Peter, 2004. "Russlands Weg vom Plan zum Markt: Sektorale Trends und regionale Spezifika. Eine Analyse der Produktivitäts- und Effizienzentwicklungen in der Transformationsphase," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 28, number 93021.
    10. N. Islam, 2000. "An Analysis of Productivity Growth in Western Australian Agriculture," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 00-15, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    11. Kumar, Praduman & Mittal, Surabhi & Hossain, Mahabub, 2008. "Agricultural Growth Accounting and Total Factor Productivity in South Asia: A Review and Policy Implications," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 21(2).
    12. Malik Shahzad Shabbir & Nusrat Yaqoob, 2019. "The impact of technological advancement on total factor productivity of cotton: a comparative analysis between Pakistan and India," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 8(1), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Jean-Christophe Bureau & Jean-Pierre Butault & Jean-Marc Rousselle, 1989. "Les indices de productivité. Aspects méthodologiques et application à l'agriculture," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 192(1), pages 88-94.
    14. Murgai, Rinku, 2001. "The Green Revolution and the productivity paradox: evidence from the Indian Punjab," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 25(2-3), pages 199-209, September.
    15. Salem, M., 1987. "Productivity and Technical Change in Canadian Food and Beverage Industries: 1961-1982," Working Papers 243864, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
    16. Weaver, Robert D., 1980. "Measurement and Forecasting of Agricultural Productivity," Staff Paper Series 256838, Pennsylvania State University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    17. C. Thirtle & P. Bottomley, 1992. "Total Factor Productivity In Uk Agriculture, 1967‐90," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 381-400, September.
    18. Trueblood, Michael A. & Ruttan, Vernon W., 1992. "A Comparison Of Multifactor Productivity Calculations Of The U.S. Agricultural Sector," Staff Papers 14165, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    19. Knopke, Philip, 1988. "Measuring Productivity Change Under Different Levels Of Assistance: The Australian Dairy Industry," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 32(2-3), pages 1-16, August.
    20. Sandhu, Gurmit S. & Phillips, W.E. & Percy, Mike, 1992. "Economic Structural Analysis of the Canadian Agricultural Production Sector," Staff Paper Series 232540, University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Production Economics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:bdbjaf:200177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/febaubd.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.