IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/364308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of fertilisers on drinking water quality in Europe: implications for sustainable agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Kuzior, Aleksandra
  • Huzenko, Maksym
  • Stoyanets, Nataliya
  • Churikanova, Olena
  • Vasylieva, Tetiana

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of the study is to reveal and evaluate the influence of different types of mineral fertilisers on drinking water quality, providing recommendations for mitigating environmental risks in European countries. Methodology / approach. The approach includes a panel analysis using fixed and random effects models, which allowed the identification of dependencies between fertiliser consumption levels and water quality indicators. The input data for the study covered indicators from 39 European countries, including EU member states, countries with harmonised legislation, and nations in the process of joining the EU. The analysis period covers 2006–2021, ensuring a balanced data panel with the same number of observations for each country over time. Key variables included the amounts of fertilisers (nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium) used per hectare and capita, as well as food export and import indicators, enabling an estimation of the overall effect of agricultural activity on water quality. Results. The study results of random effects models demonstrate that pesticide use per unit of cropland area and per capita area positively impacts the Unsafe Drinking Water Index (UDWI). Pooling models indicated fertiliser consumption reduced water safety overall (β = -0.0143, p = 0.0026). Increased nitrogen fertiliser use per hectare demonstrated a slight positive relationship with the UDWI (β = 0.0491, p = 0.048), indicating marginal improvement in water quality. Conversely, phosphate fertilisers (per hectare and capita) had a significant negative impact, with a 1 kg/ha increase associated with a reduction of UDWI by 0.2261 units (p < 0.001) and a per capita increase by 1.2815 units accordingly, underscoring risks to water safety. The intensity of agricultural exports also had a negative impact on drinking water safety, particularly when combined with broader economic export activities (interaction effect β = -0.0147, p < 0.001). In contrast, imports showed a positive relationship with drinking water safety. Originality / scientific novelty. The novelty of the study lies in identifying a quantitative relationship between mineral fertiliser use in agriculture and drinking water quality in European countries, using panel analysis to develop recommendations for mitigating environmental risks. Practical value / implications. The study’s findings underscore the need for differentiated policies in managing fertiliser application, particularly recommending stricter regulation of phosphate use due to its pronounced negative impact on drinking water quality. Policymakers should encourage sustainable agricultural practices, such as precision farming and regulated nutrient application, especially in regions with intensive export-driven agriculture. Additionally, fostering the development and adoption of environmentally friendly alternatives, including biopesticides and controlled-release fertilisers, could significantly mitigate the adverse environmental impacts identified in this research.

Suggested Citation

  • Kuzior, Aleksandra & Huzenko, Maksym & Stoyanets, Nataliya & Churikanova, Olena & Vasylieva, Tetiana, 2025. "Impact of fertilisers on drinking water quality in Europe: implications for sustainable agriculture," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 11(2), June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:364308
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.364308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/364308/files/3_Kuzior_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.364308?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:364308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.