IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/364308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of fertilisers on drinking water quality in Europe: implications for sustainable agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Kuzior, Aleksandra
  • Huzenko, Maksym
  • Stoyanets, Nataliya
  • Churikanova, Olena
  • Vasylieva, Tetiana

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of the study is to reveal and evaluate the influence of different types of mineral fertilisers on drinking water quality, providing recommendations for mitigating environmental risks in European countries. Methodology / approach. The approach includes a panel analysis using fixed and random effects models, which allowed the identification of dependencies between fertiliser consumption levels and water quality indicators. The input data for the study covered indicators from 39 European countries, including EU member states, countries with harmonised legislation, and nations in the process of joining the EU. The analysis period covers 2006–2021, ensuring a balanced data panel with the same number of observations for each country over time. Key variables included the amounts of fertilisers (nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium) used per hectare and capita, as well as food export and import indicators, enabling an estimation of the overall effect of agricultural activity on water quality. Results. The study results of random effects models demonstrate that pesticide use per unit of cropland area and per capita area positively impacts the Unsafe Drinking Water Index (UDWI). Pooling models indicated fertiliser consumption reduced water safety overall (β = -0.0143, p = 0.0026). Increased nitrogen fertiliser use per hectare demonstrated a slight positive relationship with the UDWI (β = 0.0491, p = 0.048), indicating marginal improvement in water quality. Conversely, phosphate fertilisers (per hectare and capita) had a significant negative impact, with a 1 kg/ha increase associated with a reduction of UDWI by 0.2261 units (p < 0.001) and a per capita increase by 1.2815 units accordingly, underscoring risks to water safety. The intensity of agricultural exports also had a negative impact on drinking water safety, particularly when combined with broader economic export activities (interaction effect β = -0.0147, p < 0.001). In contrast, imports showed a positive relationship with drinking water safety. Originality / scientific novelty. The novelty of the study lies in identifying a quantitative relationship between mineral fertiliser use in agriculture and drinking water quality in European countries, using panel analysis to develop recommendations for mitigating environmental risks. Practical value / implications. The study’s findings underscore the need for differentiated policies in managing fertiliser application, particularly recommending stricter regulation of phosphate use due to its pronounced negative impact on drinking water quality. Policymakers should encourage sustainable agricultural practices, such as precision farming and regulated nutrient application, especially in regions with intensive export-driven agriculture. Additionally, fostering the development and adoption of environmentally friendly alternatives, including biopesticides and controlled-release fertilisers, could significantly mitigate the adverse environmental impacts identified in this research.

Suggested Citation

  • Kuzior, Aleksandra & Huzenko, Maksym & Stoyanets, Nataliya & Churikanova, Olena & Vasylieva, Tetiana, . "Impact of fertilisers on drinking water quality in Europe: implications for sustainable agriculture," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 11(2).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:364308
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.364308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/364308/files/3_Kuzior_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.364308?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baojing Gu & Xiuming Zhang & Shu Kee Lam & Yingliang Yu & Hans J. M. Grinsven & Shaohui Zhang & Xiaoxi Wang & Benjamin Leon Bodirsky & Sitong Wang & Jiakun Duan & Chenchen Ren & Lex Bouwman & Wim Vrie, 2023. "Cost-effective mitigation of nitrogen pollution from global croplands," Nature, Nature, vol. 613(7942), pages 77-84, January.
    2. Mark A. Sutton & Oene Oenema & Jan Willem Erisman & Adrian Leip & Hans van Grinsven & Wilfried Winiwarter, 2011. "Too much of a good thing," Nature, Nature, vol. 472(7342), pages 159-161, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zehui Liu & Harald E. Rieder & Christian Schmidt & Monika Mayer & Yixin Guo & Wilfried Winiwarter & Lin Zhang, 2023. "Optimal reactive nitrogen control pathways identified for cost-effective PM2.5 mitigation in Europe," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Tianyi Qiu & Yu Shi & Josep Peñuelas & Ji Liu & Qingliang Cui & Jordi Sardans & Feng Zhou & Longlong Xia & Weiming Yan & Shuling Zhao & Shushi Peng & Jinshi Jian & Qinsi He & Wenju Zhang & Min Huang &, 2024. "Optimizing cover crop practices as a sustainable solution for global agroecosystem services," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Meyer-Aurich, Andreas & Karatay, Yusuf Nadi, 2019. "Effects of uncertainty and farmers' risk aversion on optimal N fertilizer supply in wheat production in Germany," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 130-139.
    4. Simon Anastasiadis & Marie-Laure Nauleau & Suzi Kerr & Tim Cox & Kit Rutherford, 2011. "Does Complex Hydrology Require Complex Water Quality Policy? NManager Simulations for Lake Rotorua," Motu Working Papers 11_14, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    5. Ledgard, Stewart F. & Wei, Sha & Wang, Xiaoqin & Falconer, Shelley & Zhang, Nannan & Zhang, Xiying & Ma, Lin, 2019. "Nitrogen and carbon footprints of dairy farm systems in China and New Zealand, as influenced by productivity, feed sources and mitigations," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 155-163.
    6. Charné Viljoen & Janke van der Colf & Pieter Andreas Swanepoel, 2020. "Benefits Are Limited with High Nitrogen Fertiliser Rates in Kikuyu-Ryegrass Pasture Systems," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-20, May.
    7. Xiaolin Yang & Jinran Xiong & Taisheng Du & Xiaotang Ju & Yantai Gan & Sien Li & Longlong Xia & Yanjun Shen & Steven Pacenka & Tammo S. Steenhuis & Kadambot H. M. Siddique & Shaozhong Kang & Klaus But, 2024. "Diversifying crop rotation increases food production, reduces net greenhouse gas emissions and improves soil health," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Fan, Xing & Peng, Jinshan & Han, Yuqing & Chang, Jie & Ge, Ying & Song, Dan, 2025. "Water-energy-food nexus in the sustainable management of crop-livestock coupled systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 378(PA).
    9. Sam Coggins & Andrew J. McDonald & João Vasco Silva & Anton Urfels & Hari Sankar Nayak & Sonam Rinchen Sherpa & Mangi Lal Jat & Hanuman Sahay Jat & Tim Krupnik & Virender Kumar & Ram. K. Malik & Tek B, 2025. "Data-driven strategies to improve nitrogen use efficiency of rice farming in South Asia," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 22-33, January.
    10. Cathal Buckley & Paul Murphy & David Wall, 2013. "Farm-gate N and P balances and use efficiencies across specialist dairy farms in the Republic Ireland," Working Papers 1302, Rural Economy and Development Programme,Teagasc.
    11. Andreas Meyer-Aurich & Jørgen Olesen & Annette Prochnow & Reiner Brunsch, 2013. "Greenhouse gas mitigation with scarce land: The potential contribution of increased nitrogen input," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 18(7), pages 921-932, October.
    12. Yusuf Nadi Karatay & Andreas Meyer-Aurich, 2018. "A Model Approach for Yield-Zone-Specific Cost Estimation of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation by Nitrogen Fertilizer Reduction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    13. Cecilia Bellora & Élodie Blanc & Jean-Marc Bourgeon & Eric Strobl, 2018. "Estimating the Impact of Crop Diversity on Agricultural Productivity in South Africa," NBER Chapters, in: Agricultural Productivity and Producer Behavior, pages 185-215, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Sandra Lage & Zivan Gojkovic & Christiane Funk & Francesco G. Gentili, 2018. "Algal Biomass from Wastewater and Flue Gases as a Source of Bioenergy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-30, March.
    15. Ahmmed Md Motasim & Abd Wahid Samsuri & Arina Shairah Abdul Sukor & Amin Mohd Adibah, 2021. "Gaseous Nitrogen Losses from Tropical Soils with Liquid or Granular Urea Fertilizer Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-11, March.
    16. Jinglan Cui & Ouping Deng & Miao Zheng & Xiuming Zhang & Zihao Bian & Naiqing Pan & Hanqin Tian & Jianming Xu & Baojing Gu, 2024. "Warming exacerbates global inequality in forest carbon and nitrogen cycles," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    17. Dan Zheng & Abdullah Addas & Liaqat Ali Waseem & Syed Ali Asad Naqvi & Muneeb Ahmad & Kashif Sharif, 2024. "The hidden costs of inflation: A critical analysis of industrial development and environmental consequences," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(8), pages 1-25, August.
    18. Guo, Xiaoxia & Zhu, Annah Lake & Zhu, Xueqin & An, Zhichao & Xu, Yan & Zhuang, Minghao & Wang, Chong & Zhang, Fusuo, 2024. "Promoting sustainable smallholder farming systems in China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    19. Castro Campos, Bente & Petrick, Martin, "undated". "Agricultural Land Use, Local Political Power, and Groundwater Nitrate Contamination in Germany," 60th Annual Conference, Halle/ Saale, Germany, September 23-25, 2020 305583, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    20. Gong, Aolin & Mieno, Taro & Bullock, David S., "undated". "Using On-farm Precision Experimentation Data to Analyse Maximum Return to Nitrogen (MRTN) Recommendations," Agri-Tech Economics Papers 337140, Harper Adams University, Land, Farm & Agribusiness Management Department.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:364308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.