IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajfand/340682.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects Of Residue Management On Arthropods Populations Under Conservation Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Kadango, TL
  • Assefa, Y
  • Mnkeni, PNS
  • Niba, AS

Abstract

Maize (Zea mays L.) production in South Africa by smallholder farmers is primarily hampered by several factors, including institutional constraints, soil degradation, low input production, and insect pest attacks. Conservation agriculture (CA) is perceived as an approach that can help arrest or reverse the processes of soil degradation, improve soil fertility, pest management, and promote water conservation. However, results on the role of CA in pest management are contradictory. They show spatial and temporal variations due to the agroecosystem’s complex interactions among biotic and abiotic components. This study employed the approach of the component omission to investigate the probable effects of crop residue management on insect pest populations in a maize-based cropping system. Field experiments were carried out at ongoing CA trials at the University of Fort Hare farm (UFH) (32o 47′ S and 27o 50′ E) and Pandulwazi High School (32o 39′ S and 26o 55′ E). The trial was set up in a splitsplit plot design with 16 treatments and 3 replicates. Main plots were allocated to two tillage levels, which were split into four different crop rotation levels as sub-plot treatments. The sub-sub plots were allocated to two residue management levels. For conventional tillage study, two levels of crop rotation and residue management were considered as the different CA adoption levels by smallholder farmers. The results revealed that crop rotation and residue management influence arthropod abundances, diversity, richness, and evenness, which can be used to predict or monitor pest outbreaks. However, the synergistic influence of environmental/climatic regimes cannot be separated from the individual agronomic practices. Furthermore, pest indices cannot be independently used to predict insect pest infestation and possible outbreaks; instead, they are dependent. Hence, they are site and time specific.

Suggested Citation

  • Kadango, TL & Assefa, Y & Mnkeni, PNS & Niba, AS, 2023. "Effects Of Residue Management On Arthropods Populations Under Conservation Agriculture," African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), vol. 23(4), January.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajfand:340682
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.340682
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/340682/files/Kadango.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.340682?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oluyede Clifford Ajayi & Festus K. Akinnifesi & Gudeta Sileshi & Sebastian Chakeredza, 2007. "Adoption of renewable soil fertility replenishment technologies in the southern African region: Lessons learnt and the way forward," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 31(4), pages 306-317, November.
    2. Hebinck†, Paul & Smith, Lothar & Aliber, Michael, 2023. "Beyond technocracy: The role of the state in rural development in the Eastern Cape, South Africa," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shukla, Sumedha & Arora, Gaurav, 2023. "Soil quality perceptions: Characterizing bias and linkage with farming decisions for rice- growers in India," 2023 Annual Meeting, July 23-25, Washington D.C. 336014, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. S?ren Marcus Pedersen & Kim Martin Lind & Orjon Xhoxhi & Attila Yazar & Sven-Erik Jacobsen & Jens Erik ?rum, 2020. "Introducing quinoa in Turkey - farmers perception in the region of Adana," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 22(1), pages 1-24.
    3. Djenontin, Ida Nadia S. & Zulu, Leo C. & Richardson, Robert B., 2022. "Smallholder farmers and forest landscape restoration in sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Central Malawi," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    4. Yaying Zhu & Juan Chen, 2022. "Small-Scale Farmers’ Preference Heterogeneity for Green Agriculture Policy Incentives Identified by Choice Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Ndlovu, Nicholas. P. & Borrass, Lars, 2021. "Promises and potentials do not grow trees and crops. A review of institutional and policy research in agroforestry for the Southern African region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    6. Jha, Srijna & Kaechele, Harald & Sieber, Stefan, 2021. "Factors influencing the adoption of agroforestry by smallholder farmer households in Tanzania: Case studies from Morogoro and Dodoma," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    7. Brosseau, Antoine & Saito, Kazuki & van Oort, Pepijn A.J. & Diagne, Mandiaye & Valbuena, Diego & Groot, Jeroen C.J., 2021. "Exploring opportunities for diversification of smallholders' rice-based farming systems in the Senegal River Valley," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Crop Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajfand:340682. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ajfand.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.