IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajaees/402792.html

Perceptions of Human–Wildlife Interactions and Conservation Outcomes among Communities Residing Near Ranthambore Tiger Reserve, India

Author

Listed:
  • Meena, Deepak Chand
  • Meena, B S
  • N, Priyanka B
  • Singh, Neha
  • Chadda, Akshita
  • Kumar, Sunil
  • Chaudhary, Mukesh V.

Abstract

Protected areas such as the Ranthambore Tiger Reserve (RTR) are vital for wildlife conservation, yet they often lead to complex socio-economic dynamics for nearby communities. This study examines local perceptions of the Ranthambore Tiger Reserve (RTR), focusing on socio-cultural impacts, benefits and losses, causes of human-wildlife conflict (HWC), mitigation efforts, and overall attitudes. A survey of 360 respondents from RTR’s buffer zone was conducted using a structured questionnaire with a three-point scale. Data were analysed using weighted means, categorisation through cumulative square root frequency, Garrett Ranking and regression to identify influencing factors. Results showed 37.5% of respondents experienced high socio-cultural impacts, such as fear of wild animals and changes in farming practices. While 76.94% benefited from access to forest resources like fodder and water, only 20.28% perceived high overall benefits. Most respondents attributed HWC to urbanisation, forest resource scarcity, and preferred crops. Around 64% adopted preventive strategies, but dissatisfaction with compensation was high. Overall, 40.56% had a medium-level perception of RTR. A majority (58.61%) indicated that they request compensation from forest officials to help restore their livelihoods. Additionally, 64.17% adopted new preventive measures such as field fencing or livestock protection strategies to mitigate future losses, while 25.28% viewed such methods as ineffective and did not adopt them. Regression analysis found that family size and landholding negatively influenced perception, while education, income, herd size, extension contact, and distance from the reserve had positive effects. The study concludes that although RTR provides ecological benefits, it also creates socio-economic challenges. Strengthening compensation, conflict mitigation, and community engagement can enhance conservation support.

Suggested Citation

  • Meena, Deepak Chand & Meena, B S & N, Priyanka B & Singh, Neha & Chadda, Akshita & Kumar, Sunil & Chaudhary, Mukesh V., 2025. "Perceptions of Human–Wildlife Interactions and Conservation Outcomes among Communities Residing Near Ranthambore Tiger Reserve, India," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 43(12).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:402792
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/402792/files/Meena43122025AJAEES144308.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kedar Baral & Hari Prasad Sharma & Ripu Kunwar & Craig Morley & Achyut Aryal & Bhagawat Rimal & Weihong Ji, 2021. "Human Wildlife Conflict and Impacts on Livelihood: A Study in Community Forestry System in Mid-Hills of Nepal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Cundill, Georgina & Bezerra, Joana Carlos & De Vos, Alta & Ntingana, Nokuthula, 2017. "Beyond benefit sharing: Place attachment and the importance of access to protected areas for surrounding communities," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PB), pages 140-148.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aryal, Kishor & Maraseni, Tek & Apan, Armando, 2023. "Examining policy−institution−program (PIP) responses against the drivers of ecosystem dynamics. A chronological review (1960–2020) from Nepal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    2. Cuni-Sanchez, Aida & Ngute, Alain Senghor K. & Sonké, Bonaventure & Sainge, Moses Nsanyi & Burgess, Neil D. & Klein, Julia A. & Marchant, Rob, 2019. "The importance of livelihood strategy and ethnicity in forest ecosystem services’ perceptions by local communities in north-western Cameroon," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    3. Gregg C. Brill & Pippin M. L. Anderson & Patrick O’Farrell, 2022. "Relational Values of Cultural Ecosystem Services in an Urban Conservation Area: The Case of Table Mountain National Park, South Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-28, April.
    4. François Libois & Jean-Marie Baland & Nicolas Delbart & Subhrendu Pattanayak, 2021. "Community Forest Management: The story behind a success story in Nepal," DeFiPP Working Papers 2106, University of Namur, Development Finance and Public Policies.
    5. Sandhya Dhakal & Simant Rimal & Prashant Paudel & Anil Shrestha, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Patterns of Livestock Predation by Leopards in Bardia National Park, Nepal," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, May.
    6. Hausner, Vera Helene & Engen, Sigrid & Muñoz, Lorena & Fauchald, Per, 2021. "Assessing a nationwide policy reform toward community-based conservation of biological diversity and ecosystem services in the Alpine North," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    7. Ramakrishnan, Rajeev & Rajendrakumar, S. & Kothurkar, Nikhil K., 2024. "Regional sustainability of the Kattunayakan tribe in Kerala, India through the enhancement of agricultural, livestock, and livelihood options," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    8. Sangay Wangchuk & Jennifer Bond & Rik Thwaites & Max Finlayson, 2023. "Exploring Human–Wildlife Conflict and Implications for Food Self-Sufficiency in Bhutan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, February.
    9. Wing-Fung Lo & Li-Pei Peng, 2025. "Synergistic effect of relational values in a participatory guarantee system: a case study of an ecoagriculture initiative in Taiwan," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 42(2), pages 803-824, June.
    10. Ndayizeye, Gaëlle & Imani, Gerard & Nkengurutse, Jacques & Irampagarikiye, Rosette & Ndihokubwayo, Noël & Niyongabo, Ferdinand & Cuni-Sanchez, Aida, 2020. "Ecosystem services from mountain forests: Local communities’ views in Kibira National Park, Burundi," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    11. De Vos, A. & Cumming, G.S. & Roux, D.J., 2017. "The relevance of cross-scale connections and spatial interactions for ecosystem service delivery by protected areas: Insights from southern Africa," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PB), pages 133-139.
    12. Tindale, Sophie & Vicario-Modroño, Victoria & Gallardo-Cobos, Rosa & Hunter, Erik & Miškolci, Simona & Price, Paul Newell & Sánchez-Zamora, Pedro & Sonnevelt, Martijn & Ojo, Mercy & McInnes, Kirsty & , 2023. "Citizen perceptions and values associated with ecosystem services from European grassland landscapes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    13. Tessa Rouillard & Keagan Deponselle & Joana Carlos Bezerra, 2022. "Whose Sense of Place? Catering for Residents and Tourists from an Open-Access Protected Area in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, November.
    14. Himes, Austin & Puettmann, Klaus & Muraca, Barbara, 2020. "Trade-offs between ecosystem services along gradients of tree species diversity and values," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    15. Poudyal, Bishnu Hari & Khatri, Dil Bahadur & Paudel, Dinesh & Marquardt, Kristina & Khatri, Sanjaya, 2023. "Examining forest transition and collective action in Nepal’s community forestry," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    16. Clements, Hayley S. & De Vos, Alta & Bezerra, Joana Carlos & Coetzer, Kaera & Maciejewski, Kristine & Mograbi, Penelope J. & Shackleton, Charlie, 2021. "The relevance of ecosystem services to land reform policies: Insights from South Africa," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    17. Dylan Weyer & Joana Carlos Bezerra & Alta De Vos, 2019. "Participatory Mapping in a Developing Country Context: Lessons from South Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-16, September.
    18. Ante Mandić & Lidija Petrić, 2021. "The impacts of location and attributes of protected natural areas on hotel prices: implications for sustainable tourism development," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 833-863, January.
    19. Marcondes G. Coelho-Junior & Athila L. de Oliveira & Eduardo C. da Silva-Neto & Thayanne C. Castor-Neto & Ana A. de O. Tavares & Vanessa M. Basso & Ana P. D. Turetta & Patricia E. Perkins & Acacio G. , 2021. "Exploring Plural Values of Ecosystem Services: Local Peoples’ Perceptions and Implications for Protected Area Management in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    20. Marek Giergiczny & Sviataslau Valasiuk & Mikita Yakubouski & Mikołaj Kowalewski & Jędrzej Maskiewicz & Per Angelstam, 2023. "Attitudes toward Conservation of the Transboundary Białowieża Forest among Ecotourism Businesses in Poland and Belarus," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-24, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:402792. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalajaees.com/index.php/AJAEES/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.