IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/afbmau/333930.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Benefit Cost Analysis of Entire Male Pig Immuno-castration

Author

Listed:
  • Sinnett, Alex
  • Dunshea, Frank
  • D’Souza, Darryl
  • Malcolm, Bill
  • Griffith, Garry

Abstract

Consumers of fresh pork have long been aware of the risk of their pork purchases not meeting eating expectations due to unpleasant taste or smell or other unsatisfactory quality characteristics such as a lack of tenderness. Boar taint, or the risk of it, is one of the most important factors identified in surveys of consumers of pork as being responsible for having a poor eating experience. Immuno-castration (IC) of entire male pigs is one method of reducing boar taint in pork. Currently about 60 per cent of male pork produced in Australia is immune-castrated. The question asked here is whether it would be profitable for the industry if the remaining male slaughter pigs were immuno-castrated as well. The additional costs associated with IC include the costs of the vaccine, extra labour costs, and additional costs arising from abscesses at the injection site causing increased product downgrades and stoppages of the slaughter line for cleaning. A major benefit of IC for the pig industry is a reduction in consumers of pork enduring poor experiences from unpleasant taste or smell when they eat pork. Over time, reducing the occurrence, and the risk of occurrence, of having a less than satisfactory experience when consuming pork has the potential benefit of the industry avoiding losing customers, and even increasing demand for pork, above what it would be with the continuation of the current proportion of boar-tainted pork in the total national supply of pork. Over the next ten years, if national consumption of pork increases at the same trend of the past decade, the benefits from avoided annual losses of demand or from increases in demand by just 0.5 per cent of total annual national consumption of pork would cover the cost of the remainder of the industry adopting IC. This conclusion applies if IC was adopted fully and immediately and the cost was the lower of the range of possible cost estimates at $0.10/kg carcass weight. More realistically, if producers adopted IC more slowly and adoption of IC took five years, and the cost of using IC was $0.10/kg carcass weight, then avoiding or preventing a loss of 1.5 per cent in annual sales would mean the total benefits exceed the total costs of achieving this outcome. Such relatively small gains in sales or avoided losses of sales seem eminently achievable. The conclusion of the BCA is that an increased use of immuno-castration in Australia’s pig production system that reduces the prevalence and the risk of boar taint would have a high likelihood of delivering a net benefit to participants in the industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Sinnett, Alex & Dunshea, Frank & D’Souza, Darryl & Malcolm, Bill & Griffith, Garry, 2022. "A Benefit Cost Analysis of Entire Male Pig Immuno-castration," AFBM Journal, Australasian Farm Business Management Network, vol. 19(1), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:afbmau:333930
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.333930
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/333930/files/AFBMJ-Vol-19-Paper-4-Sinnett-et-al.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.333930?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Yue & Mounter, Stuart & Griffith, Garry, 2018. "Updating and Recalibrating Equilibrium Displacement Models of the Australian Livestock Industries: Pig Meat," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 26.
    2. Mehmet Ulubasoglu & Debdulal Mallick & Mokhtarul Wadud & Phillip Hone & Henry Haszler, 2014. "Food Demand Elasticities for Australia," Working Papers 2014_10, Deakin University, Department of Economics, revised 16 Feb 2015.
    3. Zhang, Yue & Mounter, Stuart & Griffith, Garry, 2018. "Updating and Recalibrating Equilibrium Displacement Models of the Australian Livestock Industries: Beef," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 26.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lana Awada & Peter W. B. Phillips, 2021. "The distribution of returns from land efficiency improvement in multistage production systems," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 69(1), pages 73-92, March.
    2. Li, Kuo & Griffith, Garry & Kingwell, Ross & Malcolm, Bill, 2017. "Measuring the Returns to Investment in Research and Development in the Australian Grains Industry," 2017 Conference (61st), February 7-10, 2017, Brisbane, Australia 258674, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Livestock Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:afbmau:333930. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afbmnea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.