IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v27y2025i70p994.html

The Influence of Sustainability Reporting on the Profitability of Listed Companies in the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandra Stefan

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Ileana Cosmina Pitulice

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Georgiana Oana Stanila

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Aurelia Stefanescu

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Sustainability reporting, an imperative for European companies, is a multidimensional effort that results in performance measured by ESG metrics. The unintended consequence of this imperative has been the influence on companies profitability. By using quantitative research methods, the objective of the study is to identify the indicator, i.e., the combined ESG score and its components Environment (ENV), Social (SOC) and Governance (GOV), with the most significant impact on the profitability of companies in the European Union, measured by using the Return on Assets (ROA) and Earnings Before Interests and Taxes (EBIT) indicators. The statistical analysis, using multiple linear regression models applied to the panel data, led to the achievement of the research objective. The sample is composed of 432 companies operating in 18 of the EU member countries, and the period under analysis is 2014-2023. The obtained results revealed that the factor with the most significant impact on the ROA profitability indicator is the Social Pillar, and in terms of the EBIT profitability indicator, the factor with the highest impact was shown to be the combined ESG score. Thus, we prove that although sustainability reporting is a complex process involving numerous efforts and organisational changes for companies it also delivers value-added by medium and long-term financial performance and by confirming the estimated positive effects of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). The study contributes to the ESG literature by bringing together companies from developed and emerging EU economies, using the EBIT indicator to test the influence of the ESG score and its components on profitability.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandra Stefan & Ileana Cosmina Pitulice & Georgiana Oana Stanila & Aurelia Stefanescu, 2025. "The Influence of Sustainability Reporting on the Profitability of Listed Companies in the European Union," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 27(70), pages 994-994, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:27:y:2025:i:70:p:994
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_3455.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alina Mihaela Dima & Mihail Busu & Vanesa Madalina Vargas, 2022. "The mediating role of students’ ability to adapt to online activities on the relationship between perceived university culture and academic performance," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(4), pages 1253-1281, December.
    2. Sangki Lee & Insu Kim & Chung-hun Hong, 2019. "Who Values Corporate Social Responsibility in the Korean Stock Market?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Arouri, Mohamed & Gomes, Mathieu & Pukthuanthong, Kuntara, 2019. "Corporate social responsibility and M&A uncertainty," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 176-198.
    4. Florian Berg & Julian F Kölbel & Roberto Rigobon, 2022. "Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings [Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: theory and empirical evidence]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 26(6), pages 1315-1344.
    5. Gunnar Friede & Timo Busch & Alexander Bassen, 2015. "ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(4), pages 210-233, October.
    6. Bissoondoyal-Bheenick, Emawtee & Brooks, Robert & Do, Hung Xuan, 2023. "ESG and firm performance: The role of size and media channels," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    7. George Giannopoulos & Renate Victoria Kihle Fagernes & Mahmoud Elmarzouky & Kazi Abul Bashar Muhammad Afzal Hossain, 2022. "The ESG Disclosure and the Financial Performance of Norwegian Listed Firms," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, May.
    8. Alexandre Clément & Élisabeth Robinot & Léo Trespeuch, 2023. "The use of ESG scores in academic literature: a systematic literature review," Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(1), pages 92-110, March.
    9. Kiyoung Chang & Incheol Kim & Ying Li, 2014. "The Heterogeneous Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Activities That Target Different Stakeholders," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 125(2), pages 211-234, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marie, Mohamed & Qi, Baolei & Elgammal, Mohammed & Elnahass, Marwa, 2024. "A more sustainable future: Can politically connected CEOs spur the nexus between ESG performance and firm financial performance?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    2. Zhu, Minghao & Yeung, Andy C.L. & Zhou, Honggeng, 2021. "Diversify or concentrate: The impact of customer concentration on corporate social responsibility," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    3. Norocel Ioan-Iulian & Obreja Braşoveanu Laura, 2025. "Impact of ESG Ratings on Brown Sector Firms’ Financial Performance," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 19(1), pages 2936-2950.
    4. Barontini, Roberto & Gioja, Luigi, 2025. "The market power of ESG index providers: The effects of rebalancing ESG-themed indices," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(PA).
    5. Marta Szczepańczyk & Paweł Nowodziński & Adam Sikorski, 2023. "ESG Strategy and Financial Aspects Using the Example of an Oil and Gas Midstream Company: The UNIMOT Group," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-24, September.
    6. Abdelghafar M. Elhady & Samaa Shohieb, 2025. "AI-driven sustainable finance: computational tools, ESG metrics, and global implementation," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-30, December.
    7. Cicchiello, Antonella Francesca & Foroni, Cristian & Monferrà, Stefano & Torluccio, Giuseppe, 2025. "Do FinTech Acquisitions Affect Banks' ESG Performance? Evidence from Global M&As," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    8. Mohamed Rashwan & Nardin Farouk & Rania Pasha, 2025. "Can ESG Strategies Drive Firm Value Growth in the MENA Region?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-30, September.
    9. Ke, Dun-Yao & Su, Xuan-Qi, 2024. "How Do Elite-Educated CEOs Choose the M&A Payment Method? Evidence from Taiwan," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    10. van Weeren, Michelle & Bluntz, Clarence, 2025. "What makes a rating useable? Shifting epistemic practices in the ESG rating field," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    11. Zhuang, Pengtao & He, Qing & Ju, Wangjing & Xia, Qin, 2025. "How do firms react to ESG news-based sentiment? A corporate risk-taking perspective," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    12. Heonyong JUNG, 2024. "The Moderating Effect Of Board Characteristics In The Relationship Between Esg And Corporate Financial Performance," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 19(2), pages 110-119, August.
    13. Rabab Abouarab & Tapas Mishra & Simon Wolfe, 2025. "Spotting Portfolio Greenwashing in Environmental Funds," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 197(4), pages 811-839, April.
    14. Andreas Dimmelmeier, 2024. "Expanding the politics of measurement in sustainable finance: Reconceptualizing environmental, social and governance information as infrastructure," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 42(5), pages 761-781, August.
    15. Richard Bofinger & Simon Cornée & Ariane Szafarz, 2024. "When in Rome, Do as the Romans Do: Disclosure Regulation and ESG Fund Management by Social and Conventional Banks," Working Papers CEB 24-003, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    16. Ferriani, Fabrizio, 2023. "Issuing bonds during the Covid-19 pandemic: Was there an ESG premium?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    17. Armin Varmaz & Christian Fieberg & Thorsten Poddig, 2024. "Portfolio optimization for sustainable investments," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 341(2), pages 1151-1176, October.
    18. Danisman, Gamze Ozturk & Tarazi, Amine, 2024. "ESG activity and bank lending during financial crises," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    19. Gopalakrishnan, Balagopal & Jacob, Joshy & Srivastava, Jagriti, 2022. "Fishing in muddy waters: Mergers and acquisitions during uncertainty," IIMA Working Papers WP 2022-09-02, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    20. Dunbar, Kwamie & Treku, Daniel & Sarnie, Robert & Hoover, Jack, 2023. "What does ESG risk premia tell us about mutual fund sustainability levels: A difference-in-differences analysis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C32 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes; State Space Models
    • L21 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Business Objectives of the Firm
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:27:y:2025:i:70:p:994. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.