IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adp/jnapdd/v1y2017i4p58-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Different Disciplines in the Field of Suicide Study

Author

Listed:
  • Shan CaoX

    (Department of Art & Design, Kyoto University, Japan)

  • Da-Yong Lu
  • Ting-Ren Lu

    (Department of Art & Design, Shanghai University, PR China)

  • Nagendra Sastry Yarla

    (Department of Art & Design, GITAM University, India)

Abstract

Human suicide risks and mortality predictions and preventions may be transformed from symptom-based prediction systems into pathogenic profiling-supportive diagnostic systems. In addition, specific, highly active and low-toxicity drug may be developed from the wide-spectra parameters of objective clinical data (genomics/bioinformatics/morphology systems). To attain this goal, updating pathways tailored for suicide/mental illness therapeutic improvements may be noticed and established in this article.

Suggested Citation

  • Shan CaoX & Da-Yong Lu & Ting-Ren Lu & Nagendra Sastry Yarla, 2017. "Different Disciplines in the Field of Suicide Study," Novel Approaches in Drug Designing & Development, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 1(4), pages 58-59, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:adp:jnapdd:v:1:y:2017:i:4:p:58-59
    DOI: 10.19080/NAPDD.2017.01.555568
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://juniperpublishers.com/napdd/pdf/NAPDD.MS.ID.555568.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://juniperpublishers.com/napdd/NAPDD.MS.ID.555568.php
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.19080/NAPDD.2017.01.555568?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ghazinoory, Sepehr & Aghaei, Parvaneh, 2021. "Differences between policy assessment & policy evaluation; a case study on supportive policies for knowledge-based firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adp:jnapdd:v:1:y:2017:i:4:p:58-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Thomas (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.