IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abq/mccss1/v1y2022i2p53-60.html

Assessing the Interplay of University, Industry, and Government

Author

Listed:
  • Qurat-ul- Ain

    (University of Punjab Lahore)

Abstract

In many developing nations, the connections between Education, Business, and Government (EBG) tend to be less robust. This study undertakes a comprehensive exploration of the complex dynamics and interdependent relationships among universities, industries, and government bodies. It specifically focuses on their collaborative interactions to bridge the existing knowledge gap regarding the connections between Pakistani higher education institutions, businesses, and the government. The primary objective is to gain insights into the current status of research and development (R&D) collaborations, information sharing, and resource pooling among academia, businesses, and government agencies. Quantitative research methods were employed in this investigation. The study involved surveying 827 university professors across disciplines such as social sciences, management sciences, and natural sciences. A self-developed questionnaire demonstrated strong internal consistency, reflected in Cronbach's Alpha values of 0.955 for the EBL scale and 0.931 for the EGL scale. Data analysis was conducted using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to derive meaningful conclusions. The survey findings indicate a moderate level of cooperation between universities, corporations, and governmental bodies in the domain of R&D. Collaboration levels between universities and industries varied among different academic institutions, whereas the collaboration between universities and governments appeared more consistent across the board. To enhance engagement in applied R&D with direct industry relevance, one proposed approach suggests evaluating and categorizing students based on their potential for such endeavors. Additionally, there's a suggestion for professors to encourage students to pursue research topics aligned with business interests and craft proposals aimed at attracting corporate sponsorship.

Suggested Citation

  • Qurat-ul- Ain, 2022. "Assessing the Interplay of University, Industry, and Government," Magna Carta: Contemporary Social Science, 50sea, vol. 1(2), pages 53-60, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:abq:mccss1:v:1:y:2022:i:2:p:53-60
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.50sea.com/index.php/MC/article/view/618/1156
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journal.50sea.com/index.php/MC/article/view/618
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Usman Tanveer, 2022. "Root Causes of Drug Addiction in Education Institutes with Workable Solutions," Magna Carta: Contemporary Social Science, 50sea, vol. 1(1), pages 19-29, March.
    2. Mansfield, Edwin, 1991. "Academic research and industrial innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Mats Benner & Lucia Guaranys & Anne Marie Maculan & Robert Kneller, 2008. "Pathways to the entrepreneurial university: towards a global convergence," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 35(9), pages 681-695, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David B. Audretsch & Dennis P. Leyden & Albert N. Link, 2013. "Universities as research partners in publicly supported entrepreneurial firms," Chapters, in: Public Support of Innovation in Entrepreneurial Firms, chapter 12, pages 175-192, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Muhammad Iqmal Haziq Saadun & Muhammad Haziq Hafizudin Mohd Noor Razmawee & Khairu Zikry Khairu Radzi & Nur Amnani Ahmad Yani & Mohd Zaidi Mat Saat, 2025. "Factors Influencing Employability Among Business Students at UiTM Pahang, Jengka Campus," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(7), pages 3668-3686, July.
    3. Wipo, 2011. "World Intellectual Property Report 2011- The Changing Face of Innovation," WIPO Economics & Statistics Series, World Intellectual Property Organization - Economics and Statistics Division, number 2011:944, April.
    4. Subhra Saha & Joseph Staudt & Bruce Weinbergx, 2017. "Estimating the Local Productivity Spillovers from Science," Working Papers 17-56, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    5. Luis A. N. Amaral & P. Gopikrishnan & Kaushik Matia & Vasiliki Plerou & H. E. Stanley, 2001. "Application of statistical physics methods and conceptsto the study of science & technology systems," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 51(1), pages 9-36, April.
    6. Thomas Ã…stebro, 1998. "Basic Statistics on the Success Rate and Profits for Independent Inventors," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 23(2), pages 41-48, December.
    7. Alberto Marzucchi & Davide Antonioli & Sandro Montresor, 2015. "Industry–research co-operation within and across regional boundaries. What does innovation policy add?," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(3), pages 499-524, August.
    8. Mohammadi, Ali & Broström, Anders & Franzoni, Chiara, 2015. "Work Force Composition and Innovation: How Diversity in Employees’ Ethnical and Disciplinary Backgrounds Facilitates Knowledge Re-combination," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 413, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
    9. Yi-Min Chen, 2008. "How Much Does Country Matter?," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 31(4), pages 404-435, October.
    10. Petra Andries & Dirk Czarnitzki, 2014. "Small firm innovation performance and employee involvement," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 21-38, June.
    11. David Grosse Kathoefer & Jens Leker, 2012. "Knowledge transfer in academia: an exploratory study on the Not-Invented-Here Syndrome," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 37(5), pages 658-675, October.
    12. Ronald N. Kostoff, 1994. "Assessing Research Impact," Evaluation Review, , vol. 18(1), pages 11-19, February.
    13. Federico Caviggioli & Alessandra Colombelli & Antonio De Marco & Giuseppe Scellato & Elisa Ughetto, 2023. "Co-evolution patterns of university patenting and technological specialization in European regions," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 216-239, February.
    14. Grandi, Alessandro & Grimaldi, Rosa, 2005. "Academics' organizational characteristics and the generation of successful business ideas," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 821-845, November.
    15. Cassiman, Bruno & Veugelers, Reinhilde & Zuniga, Pluvia, 2009. "Diversity of science linkages and innovation performance: some empirical evidence from Flemish firms," Economics Discussion Papers 2009-30, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    16. Aschhoff, Birgit & Sofka, Wolfgang, 2008. "Successful Patterns of Scientific Knowledge Sourcing: Mix and Match," ZEW Discussion Papers 08-033 [rev.], ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    17. Cristina Puente & María Eugenia Fabra & Cindy Mason & Cristina Puente-Rueda & Maria Ana Sáenz-Nuño & Ramiro Viñuales, 2021. "Role of the Universities as Drivers of Social Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-14, December.
    18. R. J. W. Tussen & R. K. Buter & Th. N. van Leeuwen, 2000. "Technological Relevance of Science: An Assessment of Citation Linkages between Patents and Research Papers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 47(2), pages 389-412, February.
    19. Jaana Seikkula-Leino & Maria Salomaa, 2020. "Entrepreneurial Competencies and Organisational Change—Assessing Entrepreneurial Staff Competencies within Higher Education Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-16, September.
    20. Jue Wang & Shaoming Cheng & Sukumar Ganapati, 2012. "Path dependence in regional ICT innovation: Differential evolution of Zhongguancun and Bangalore," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(3), pages 231-245, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abq:mccss1:v:1:y:2022:i:2:p:53-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Shehzad Hassan (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.