IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v30y2026i11728.html

Open Science and Responsible Science

Author

Listed:
  • Liliane Furtado
  • Denise Fleck
  • Paula Chimenti

Abstract

The motivation for this editorial arose from an episode experienced by two of the authors. During a thesis defense, when questioned by a faculty member about the instrument used in her research, a student described how difficult it had been to locate it. What began as a simple search for an instrument widely cited in the literature turned into a true “academic odyssey.” Several articles that relied on the instrument did not present it in full—only a few illustrative items. The seminal study that originally proposed the instrument was written in a language other than English. Attempts to contact the researcher who authored the scale went unanswered. At every step, a new labyrinth emerged in the effort to locate the complete instrument. Along with it grew the feeling that something essential to scientific practice remained inaccessible.

Suggested Citation

  • Liliane Furtado & Denise Fleck & Paula Chimenti, 2026. "Open Science and Responsible Science," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 30(Vol. 30 N), pages 260041-2600.
    • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:30:y:2026:i:1:1728
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1728
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1728/2222
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roth, Steffen, 2021. "The great reset of management and organization theory. A European perspective," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 538-544.
    2. Aguinis, Herman & Banks, George C. & Rogelberg, Steven G. & Cascio, Wayne F., 2020. "Actionable recommendations for narrowing the science-practice gap in open science," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 27-35.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Piers Steel & Sjoerd Beugelsdijk & Herman Aguinis, 2021. "The anatomy of an award-winning meta-analysis: Recommendations for authors, reviewers, and readers of meta-analytic reviews," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(1), pages 23-44, February.
    2. Henrique Castro Martins, 2021. "Tutorial-Articles: The Importance of Data and Code Sharing," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 25(1), pages 200212-2002.
    3. Caputo, Francesco & Cillo, Valentina & Fiano, Fabio & Pironti, Marco & Romano, Marco, 2023. "Building T-shaped professionals for mastering digital transformation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    4. Mackey, Jeremy D. & Parker Ellen, B. & McAllister, Charn P. & Alexander, Katherine C., 2021. "The dark side of leadership: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of destructive leadership research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 705-718.
    5. Fritzsche, Albrecht & Söldner, Jens-Henrik, 2025. "Capturing the breadth of value creation with science fiction storytelling: Evidence from smart service design workshops," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    6. Rodriguez-Pomeda, Jesus & Casani, Fernando & Serrano-López, Antonio Eleazar, 2023. "Reflections on the diffusion of management and organization research in the context of open science in Europe," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 664-672.
    7. Alejandra Manco, 2022. "A Landscape of Open Science Policies Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
    8. Moore, Don A. & Thau, Stefan & Zhong, Chenbo & Gino, Francesca, 2022. "Open Science at OBHDP," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    9. Mackey, Jeremy D., 2021. "Why and how predators pick prey: Followers’ personality and performance as predictors of destructive leadership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 159-169.
    10. Ika, Lavagnon A. & Locatelli, Giorgio & Drouin, Nathalie, 2024. "Policy-driven projects: Empowering the world to confront grand challenges," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 835-842.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:30:y:2026:i:1:1728. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.