Concavifiability and constructions of concave utility functions

Citations

Cited by:

1. Cherchye, Laurens & De Rock, Bram & Vermeulen, Frederic, 2010. "An Afriat Theorem for the collective model of household consumption," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(3), pages 1142-1163, May.
   • Cherchye, L.J.H. & de Rock, B. & Vermeulen, F.M.P., 2008. "An Afriat Theorem for the Collective Model of Household Consumption," Discussion Paper 2008-72, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
   • Cherchye, Laurens & De Rock, Bram & Vermeulen, Frederic, 2008. "An Afriat Theorem for the Collective Model of Household Consumption," IZA Discussion Papers 3794, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
   • Laurens Cherchye & Bram De Rock & Frederic Vermeulen, 2008. "An Afriat theorem for the collective model of household consumption," Working Papers ECARES 2008-027, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
   • Laurens Cherchye & Bram De Rock & Frederic Vermeulen, 2008. "An Afriat Theorem for the collective model of household consumption," Working Papers of Department of Economics, Leuven ces0825, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Department of Economics, Leuven.
   • Laurens Cherchye & Bram De Rock & Frederic Vermeulen, 2010. "An Afriat theorem for the collective model of household consumption," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/131711, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
   • Cherchye, L.J.H. & de Rock, B. & Vermeulen, F.M.P., 2008. "An Afriat Theorem for the Collective Model of Household Consumption," Other publications TiSEM 48f0016b-395e-416a-b8a6-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
2. Nejat Anbarci & Nick Feltovich, 2013. "How sensitive are bargaining outcomes to changes in disagreement payoffs?," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 16(4), pages 560-596, December.
   • Nejat Anbarci & Nick Feltovich, 2011. "How sensitive are bargaining outcomes to changes in disagreement payoffs?," EcoMod2011 3442, EcoMod.
   • Nejat Anbarci & Nick Feltovich, 2011. "How sensitive are bargaining outcomes to changes in disagreement payoffs?," Monash Economics Working Papers 36-11, Monash University, Department of Economics.
3. Kibris, Ozgur, 2002. "Misrepresentation of Utilities in Bargaining: Pure Exchange and Public Good Economies," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 91-110, April.
   • KIBRIS, Özgür, 2002. "Misrepresentation of utilities in bargaining: pure exchange and public good economies," LIDAM Reprints CORE 1546, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
4. Driesen, Bram & Lombardi, Michele & Peters, Hans, 2016. "Feasible sets, comparative risk aversion, and comparative uncertainty aversion in bargaining," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 162-170.
   • Driesen, B.W.I. & Lombardi, M. & Peters, H.J.M., 2015. "Feasible sets, comparative risk aversion, and comparative uncertainty aversion in bargaining," Research Memorandum 031, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
5. Claus-Jochen Haake & Bettina Klaus, 2009. "Monotonicity and Nash implementation in matching markets with contracts," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 41(3), pages 393-410, December.
   • Klaus, B.E. & Haake, C.J., 2005. "Monotonicity and nash implementation in matching markets with contracts," Research Memorandum 029, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
   • Haake, C.J. & Klaus, B.E., 2007. "Monotonicity and nash implementation in matching markets with contracts," Research Memorandum 058, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
   • Haake, C.J. & Klaus, B.E., 2006. "Monotonicity and nash implementation in matching markets with contracts," Research Memorandum 059, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
   • Haake, Claus-Jochen & Klaus, Bettina, 2011. "Monotonicity and Nash implementation in matching markets with contracts," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 372, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
6. Hosoya, Yuhki, 2022. "An axiom for concavifiable preferences in view of Alt’s theory," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
7. Cesar Martinelli & Mikhail Freer, 2016. "General Revealed Preferences," Working Papers 1059, George Mason University, Interdisciplinary Center for Economic Science, revised Jun 2016.
8. Smith Trenton G. & Tasnádi Attila, 2009. "Why (and When) are Preferences Convex? Threshold Effects and Uncertain Quality," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-24, January.
9. Bolte, Jérôme & Pauwels, Edouard, 2020. "Curiosities and counterexamples in smooth convex optimization," TSE Working Papers 20-1080, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
10. John S. Chipman, 2010. "The Utility-Possibility Frontier," Chapters, in: Mark Blaug & Peter Lloyd (ed.), Famous Figures and Diagrams in Economics, chapter 34, Edward Elgar Publishing.
11. ,, 2010. "Rationalizable voting," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 5(1), January.
    • Tasos Kalandrakis, 2008. "Rationalizable Voting," Wallis Working Papers WP51, University of Rochester - Wallis Institute of Political Economy.
12. Kannai, Yakar, 1989. "A characterization of monotone individual demand functions," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 87-94, February.
13. Apartsin, Yevgenia & Kannai, Yakar, 2006. "Demand properties of concavifiable preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 36-55, December.
14. Richter, Marcel K. & Wong, K.-C.Kam-Chau, 2004. "Concave utility on finite sets," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 341-357, April.
15. Paolo Giovanni Piacquadio, 2017. "A Fairness Justification of Utilitarianism," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 85, pages 1261-1276, July.
    • Paolo Giovanni Piacquadio, 2016. "A Fairness Justification of Utilitarianism," CESifo Working Paper Series 5785, CESifo.
16. Ali Khan, M. & Schlee, Edward E., 2017. "The nonconcavity of money-metric utility: A new formulation and proof," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 10-12.
17. Rosa L. Matzkin, 1990. "Least Concavity and the Distribution-Free Estimation of Non-Parametric Concave Functions," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 958, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
18. van Birgelen, M.J.H. & de Ruyter, J.C. & Wetzels, M.G.M., 2000. "The impact of attitude strength on the use of customer satisfaction information: an empirical investigation," Research Memorandum 037, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
19. Maria Gallego, David Scoones, 2005. "The Art of Compromise," Working Papers eg0042, Wilfrid Laurier University, Department of Economics, revised 2005.
20. Rausser, Gordon C. & Simon, Leo K., 2016. "Nash bargaining and risk aversion," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 1-9.
    • Rausser, Gordon C & Simon, Leo K, 2016. "Nash bargaining and risk aversion," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt3x2173v3, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
21. Jonathan Shalev, 2002. "Loss Aversion and Bargaining," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 201-232, May.
    • Jonathan Shalev, 1996. "Loss Aversion and Bargaining," Game Theory and Information 9606001, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 19 Jul 1997.
    • SHALEV, Jonathan, 1997. "Loss aversion and bargaining," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 1997006, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
22. Knut Aase, 2009. "The Nash bargaining solution vs. equilibrium in a reinsurance syndicate," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2009(3), pages 219-238.
    • Aase, Knut K., 2008. "The Nash Bargaining Solution vs. Equilibrium in a Reinsurance Syndicate," Discussion Papers 2008/5, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
23. Caroline Berden & Hans Peters, 2006. "On the Effect of Risk Aversion in Bimatrix Games," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 359-370, June.
    • Berden, C. & Peters, H.J.M., 2005. "On the effect of risk aversion in bimatrix games," Research Memorandum 030, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
24. John K.-H. Quah, 2000. "The Monotonicity of Individual and Market Demand," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 68(4), pages 911-930, July.
    • Quah, J-K-H, 1996. "The Monotonicity of Individual and Market Demand," Economics Papers 127, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
25. Gomez, Juan Camilo, 2006. "Achieving efficiency with manipulative bargainers," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 254-263, November.
26. Monteiro, Paulo Klinger, 2010. "A Class of Convex Preferences Without Concave Representation," Revista Brasileira de Economia - RBE, EPGE Brazilian School of Economics and Finance - FGV EPGE (Brazil), vol. 64(1), March.
27. Hayashi, Takashi, 2008. "A note on small income effects," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 360-379, March.
28. Lajeri-Chaherli, Fatma, 2003. "Partial derivatives, comparative risk behavior and concavity of utility functions," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 81-99, August.
29. Volij, Oscar & Winter, Eyal, 2002. "On risk aversion and bargaining outcomes," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 120-140, October.
    • Oscar Volij, 1999. "On Risk Aversion and Bargaining Outcomes," Economic theory and game theory 010, Oscar Volij.
    • Volij, Oscar & Winter, Eyal, 2002. "On Risk Aversion and Bargaining Outcomes," Staff General Research Papers Archive 10130, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
30. Driesen, Bram & Perea, Andrés & Peters, Hans, 2011. "The Kalai-Smorodinsky bargaining solution with loss aversion," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 58-64, January.
    • Driesen, B.W.I. & Perea ý Monsuwé, A. & Peters, H.J.M., 2009. "The Kalai-Smorodinsky solution with loss aversion," Research Memorandum 030, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
31. Christopher Connell & Eric Rasmusen, 2012. "Concavifying the Quasiconcave," Working Papers 2012-10, Indiana University, Kelley School of Business, Department of Business Economics and Public Policy.
32. Sanxi Li & Hailin Sun & Jianye Yan & Xundong Yin, 2015. "Risk aversion in the Nash bargaining problem with uncertainty," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 115(3), pages 257-274, July.
33. Eguia, Jon X., 2011. "Foundations of spatial preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 200-205, March.
    • Eguia, Jon X., 2008. "The Foundations of Spatial Preferences," Working Papers 08-01, C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, New York University.
34. Yuhki Hosoya, 2021. "An Axiom for Concavifiable Preferences in View of Alt's Theory," Papers 2102.07237, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2021.
35. Per Hjertstrand, 2023. "On the Curvature of Homogeneous Functions," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 198(1), pages 215-223, July.
36. Paolo Giovanni Piacquadio, 2020. "Poverty and Individual Responsibility," CESifo Working Paper Series 8169, CESifo.
37. Fatma Lajeri-Chaherli, 2016. "On The Concavity And Quasiconcavity Properties Of ( Σ , Μ ) Utility Functions," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(3), pages 287-296, April.
38. John K.-H. Quah, 2000. "The Weak Axiom and Comparative Statics," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 0437, Econometric Society.
39. Jon Eguia, 2013. "On the spatial representation of preference profiles," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 52(1), pages 103-128, January.
40. repec:dgr:umamet:2009030 is not listed on IDEAS
41. Kobberling, Veronika & Peters, Hans, 2003. "The effect of decision weights in bargaining problems," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 110(1), pages 154-175, May.
    • Peters, H.J.M. & Koebberling, V., 2002. "The effect of decision weights in bargaining problems," Research Memorandum 064, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
42. Reny, Philip J., 2013. "A simple proof of the nonconcavifiability of functions with linear not-all-parallel contour sets," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(6), pages 506-508.
43. Charles-Cadogan, G., 2018. "Losses loom larger than gains and reference dependent preferences in Bernoulli’s utility function," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 220-237.
44. Cressman, Ross & Gallego, Maria, 2009. "On the ranking of bilateral bargaining opponents," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 64-83, July.
    • Ross Cressman, Maria Gallego, 2005. "On the Ranking of Bilateral Bargaining Opponents," Working Papers eg0043, Wilfrid Laurier University, Department of Economics, revised 2005.
45. Levin, Vladimir L., 1997. "Reduced cost functions and their applications," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 155-186, September.
46. Edward E. Schlee & M. Ali Khan, 2022. "Money Metrics In Applied Welfare Analysis: A Saddlepoint Rehabilitation," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 63(1), pages 189-210, February.
47. Kannai, Yakar, 2004. "When is individual demand concavifiable?," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1-2), pages 59-69, February.
48. Ehud Kalai, 1983. "Solutions to the Bargaining Problem," Discussion Papers 556, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
49. John Chipman, 2006. "Pareto and contemporary economic theory," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 53(4), pages 451-475, December.
50. Hailin Sun & Sanxi Li & Tong Wang, 2013. "Change in risk and bargaining game," University of East Anglia Applied and Financial Economics Working Paper Series 036, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..