IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/eee/econom/v156y2010i2p337-343.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

The impact of a Hausman pretest on the size of a hypothesis test: The panel data case

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Doko Tchatoka, Firmin & Wang, Wenjie, 2021. "Size-corrected Bootstrap Test after Pretesting for Exogeneity with Heteroskedastic or Clustered Data," MPRA Paper 110899, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  2. Adam McCloskey, 2012. "Bonferroni-Based Size-Correction for Nonstandard Testing Problems," Working Papers 2012-16, Brown University, Department of Economics.
  3. Hasan, Iftekhar & Jackowicz, Krzysztof & Kowalewski, Oskar & Kozłowski, Łukasz, 2013. "Market discipline during crisis: Evidence from bank depositors in transition countries," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 5436-5451.
  4. Akhtaruzzaman, M. & Berg, Nathan & Hajzler, Christopher, 2017. "Expropriation risk and FDI in developing countries: Does return of capital dominate return on capital?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 84-107.
  5. Kabaila, Paul & Mainzer, Rheanna & Farchione, Davide, 2015. "The impact of a Hausman pretest, applied to panel data, on the coverage probability of confidence intervals," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 12-15.
  6. Guarino, Cassandra M. & Reckase, Mark D. & Stacy, Brian & Wooldridge, Jeffrey M., 2014. "Evaluating Specification Tests in the Context of Value-Added Estimation," IZA Discussion Papers 7974, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
  7. Valentina Corradi & Daniel Gutknecht, 2019. "Testing for Quantile Sample Selection," Papers 1907.07412, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2021.
  8. Doko Tchatoka, Firmin & Dufour, Jean-Marie, 2020. "Exogeneity tests, incomplete models, weak identification and non-Gaussian distributions: Invariance and finite-sample distributional theory," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 218(2), pages 390-418.
  9. Bartolucci, Francesco & Bacci, Silvia & Pigini, Claudia, 2017. "Misspecification test for random effects in generalized linear finite-mixture models for clustered binary and ordered data," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 3(C), pages 112-131.
  10. Leslie E. Papke & Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2023. "A simple, robust test for choosing the level of fixed effects in linear panel data models," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 64(6), pages 2683-2701, June.
  11. Paul Kabaila & Rheanna Mainzer & Davide Farchione, 2017. "Conditional assessment of the impact of a Hausman pretest on confidence intervals," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 71(4), pages 240-262, November.
  12. Pedro H. C. Sant'Anna & Qi Xu, 2023. "Difference-in-Differences with Compositional Changes," Papers 2304.13925, arXiv.org.
  13. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M., 2019. "Correlated random effects models with unbalanced panels," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 211(1), pages 137-150.
  14. Hasan, Iftekhar & Jackowicz, Krzysztof & Kowalewski, Oskar & Kozłowski, Łukasz, 2013. "Market discipline during crisis: Evidence from bank depositors in transition countries," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 5436-5451.
  15. Chatelain, Jean-Bernard & Ralf, Kirsten, 2021. "Inference on time-invariant variables using panel data: A pretest estimator," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 157-166.
  16. Firmin Doko Tchatoka, 2015. "On bootstrap validity for specification tests with weak instruments," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 18(1), pages 137-146, February.
  17. Wang, Yun & Zhang, Yonghui & Zhou, Qiankun, 2016. "A Stein-like estimator for linear panel data models," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 156-161.
  18. Doko Tchatoka, Firmin & Wang, Wenjie, 2021. "Uniform Inference after Pretesting for Exogeneity with Heteroskedastic Data," MPRA Paper 106408, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  19. Minsu Chang & Francis J. DiTraglia, 2020. "A Generalized Focused Information Criterion for GMM," Papers 2011.07085, arXiv.org.
  20. Doko Tchatoka, Firmin & Wang, Wenjie, 2020. "Uniform Inference after Pretesting for Exogeneity," MPRA Paper 99243, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  21. Squires, Dale, 2016. "Firm behavior under quantity controls: The theory of virtual quantities," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 70-86.
  22. Wang, Wenjie & Doko Tchatoka, Firmin, 2018. "On Bootstrap inconsistency and Bonferroni-based size-correction for the subset Anderson–Rubin test under conditional homoskedasticity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 188-211.
  23. McCloskey, Adam, 2017. "Bonferroni-based size-correction for nonstandard testing problems," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 17-35.
  24. Hutniczak, Barbara, 2015. "Modeling heterogeneous fleet in an ecosystem based management context," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 203-214.
  25. repec:zbw:bofitp:2013_021 is not listed on IDEAS
  26. Moh’d Al-Azzam & Christopher Parmeter, 2021. "Competition and microcredit interest rates: international evidence," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 829-868, February.
  27. Nicholas King & P. Dorian Owen & Rick Audas, 2012. "Playoff Uncertainty, Match Uncertainty and Attendance at Australian National Rugby League Matches," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 88(281), pages 262-277, June.
  28. Ikeda, Shin S., 2019. "Illiquidity in the Japan electric power exchange," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 14(C), pages 16-39.
  29. Li, Haiqi & Chen, Xingyi & Liang, Jufang, 2022. "Shrinkage estimation of panel data models with interactive effects," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
  30. Naoya Sueishi, 2022. "A Misuse of Specification Tests," Papers 2211.11915, arXiv.org.
  31. Nakabayashi, Masaki, 2019. "Ownership structure and market efficiency," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 189-212.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.