IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mlucee/20128.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Gründe versus Anreize? Ein ordonomischer Werkstattbericht in sechs Thesen

Author

Listed:
  • Pies, Ingo
  • Hielscher, Stefan

Abstract

Dieser Artikel skizziert in geraffter Thesenform, wie das ordonomische Forschungsprogramm folgende Fragen beantwortet: Wie passt die philosophische „Welt der Gründe“ zur ökonomischen Welt der Anreize? Wie lassen sich beide Welten so miteinander vermitteln, dass es zu einer Konvergenz guter Gründe und guter Anreize kommen kann? Welche Hindernisse begegnen auf diesem Weg, und wie lassen sie sich überwinden? Sind Zynismus und Moralismus Zufallsprodukte moralischer Diskurse, oder sind sie eine Begleiterscheinung der beiden Pathologien der modernen Gesellschaft? Widersprechen sich Individualethik und Institutionenethik, oder kann man sich sogar vorstellen, dass sie Hand in Hand arbeiten können?

Suggested Citation

  • Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan, 2012. "Gründe versus Anreize? Ein ordonomischer Werkstattbericht in sechs Thesen," Discussion Papers 2012-8, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:20128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/170366/1/dp2012-08.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ingo Pies & Markus Beckmann & Stefan Hielscher, 2010. "Value Creation, Management Competencies, and Global Corporate Citizenship: An Ordonomic Approach to Business Ethics in the Age of Globalization," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(2), pages 265-278, June.
    2. Pies, Ingo, 2009. "Das ordonomische Forschungsprogramm," Discussion Papers 2009-7, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    3. Pies, Ingo, 2011. "Die zwei Pathologien der Moderne: Eine ordonomische Argumentationsskizze," Discussion Papers 2011-14, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    4. Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan & Beckmann, Markus, 2009. "Moral Commitments and the Societal Role of Business: An Ordonomic Approach to Corporate Citizenship," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(3), pages 375-401, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:zbw:iamost:200287 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Pies, Ingo, 2012. "Optimierung versus Koordinierung: Zur ordonomischen Klärung des wirtschaftsethischen Problems," Discussion Papers 2012-21, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    3. Loy, Jens-Peter & Schmitz, P. Michael & Glauben, Thomas & Djuric, Ivan & Götz, Linde & Pàll, Zsombor & Perekhozhuk, Oleksandr & Prehn, Sören & Renner, Swetlana & Hermann, Roland & Pies, Ingo & Will, M, 2014. "Marktwirtschaftliche Koordination: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen. Symposium anlässlich des 75. Geburtstages von Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Ulrich Koester," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies 200287, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    4. Pies, Ingo & Will, Matthias Georg, 2013. "Finanzspekulation mit Agrarrohstoffen: Wie (Wirtschafts-)Ethik und (Agrar-)Ökonomik gemeinsam einem Diskurs- und Politik-Versagen entgegentreten können," Discussion Papers 2013-12, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pies, Ingo, 2011. "Regelkonsens statt Wertekonsens: Die Grundidee des politischen Liberalismus," Discussion Papers 2011-20, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    2. Pies, Ingo, 2011. "Karl Homanns Programm einer ökonomischen Ethik – "A View From Inside" in zehn Thesen," Discussion Papers 2011-1, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    3. Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan, 2013. "(Verhaltens-)Ökonomik versus (Ordnungs-)Ethik? Zum moralischen Stellenwert von Dispositionen und Institutionen," Discussion Papers 2013-22, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    4. Will, Matthias Georg & Hielscher, Stefan, 2013. "How do companies invest in corporate social responsibility? An ordonomic contribution for empirical CSR research," Discussion Papers 2013-3, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    5. Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan & Everding, Sebastian, 2020. "Do hybrids impede sustainability? How semantic reorientations and governance reforms can produce and preserve sustainability in sharing business models," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 174-185.
    6. Pies, Ingo, 2012. "Optimierung versus Koordinierung: Zur ordonomischen Klärung des wirtschaftsethischen Problems," Discussion Papers 2012-21, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    7. Wockenfuß, Christof, 2009. "Demokratie durch Entwicklungskonkurrenz," Discussion Papers 2009-17, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    8. Pies, Ingo & Beckmann, Markus & Hielscher, Stefan, 2012. "The political role of the business firm: An ordonomic concept of corporate citizenship developed in comparison with the Aristoleian idea of individual citizenship," Discussion Papers 2012-1, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    9. Ingo Pies & Philipp Schreck & Karl Homann, 2021. "Single-objective versus multi-objective theories of the firm: using a constitutional perspective to resolve an old debate," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 779-811, April.
    10. Matthias Georg Will & Stefan Hielscher, 2014. "How do Companies Invest in Corporate Social Responsibility? An Ordonomic Contribution for Empirical CSR Research," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-23, July.
    11. Suchanek Andreas, 2012. "Unternehmensverantwortung als Vermeidung relevanter Inkonsistenzen / Corporate Responsibility: The Avoidance of Relevant Inconsistencies," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 63(1), pages 241-260, January.
    12. Markus Beckmann & Stefan Hielscher & Ingo Pies, 2014. "Commitment Strategies for Sustainability: How Business Firms Can Transform Trade‐Offs Into Win–Win Outcomes," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(1), pages 18-37, January.
    13. Will, Matthias Georg & Hielscher, Stefan, 2012. "How do companies invest in corporate social responsibility? An ordonomic contribution for empirical CSR research," Discussion Papers 2012-2, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    14. Pies, Ingo, 2014. "F. A. von Hayek und die moralische Qualität des Wettbewerbs," Discussion Papers 2014-12, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    15. Pies, Ingo & Sass, Peter, 2011. "Wie sollte die Managementvergütung (nicht) reguliert werden? Ordnungspolitische Überlegungen zur Haftungsbeschränkung von und in Organisationen," Discussion Papers 2011-2, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    16. Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan, 2019. "Fighting corruption: How binding commitments of business firms can help to activate the self-regulating forces of competitive markets," Discussion Papers 2019-04, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    17. Will, Matthias Georg, 2011. "Technologischer Fortschritt und Vertrauen: Gefahrenproduktivität und Bindungsmechanismen zur Überwindung von Konflikten," Discussion Papers 2011-19, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    18. Felix Carl Schultz & Robert Jaroslav Reinhardt, 2022. "Facilitating systemic eco‐innovation to pave the way for a circular economy: A qualitative‐empirical study on barriers and drivers in the European polyurethane industry," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(5), pages 1646-1675, October.
    19. Pies, Ingo, 2010. "Moderne Ethik - Ethik der Moderne: Fünf Thesen aus ordonomischer Sicht," Discussion Papers 2010-8, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    20. Paul Shrivastava & Silvester Ivanaj & Sybil Persson, 2013. "Transdisciplinary Study of Sustainable Enterprise," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(4), pages 230-244, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:20128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wwhalde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.