IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mlucee/201312.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Finanzspekulation mit Agrarrohstoffen: Wie (Wirtschafts-)Ethik und (Agrar-)Ökonomik gemeinsam einem Diskurs- und Politik-Versagen entgegentreten können

Author

Listed:
  • Pies, Ingo
  • Will, Matthias Georg

Abstract

Dieser Artikel entfaltet seine Argumentation in drei Schritten: Erstens wird rekonstruiert, wie Adam Smith der zeitgenössischen Kritik an der Agrarspekulation argumentativ begegnete. Zweitens wird skizziert, wie man der gegenwärtigen Kritik an der (vermeintlichen) Agrarspekulation durch Indexfonds argumentativ begegnen kann. Der dritte Schritt formuliert aus ordonomischer Sicht die Basis für eine verstärkte interdisziplinäre Zusammenarbeit zwischen (Wirtschafts-)Ethik und (Agrar-)Ökonomik.

Suggested Citation

  • Pies, Ingo & Will, Matthias Georg, 2013. "Finanzspekulation mit Agrarrohstoffen: Wie (Wirtschafts-)Ethik und (Agrar-)Ökonomik gemeinsam einem Diskurs- und Politik-Versagen entgegentreten können," Discussion Papers 2013-12, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:201312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/170398/1/dp2013-12.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ingo Pies & Sören Prehn & Thomas Glauben & Matthias Will, 2013. "Nahrungssicherheit und Agrarspekulation: Was ist politisch zu tun?," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 93(2), pages 103-109, February.
    2. Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan, 2012. "Gründe versus Anreize? Ein ordonomischer Werkstattbericht in sechs Thesen," Discussion Papers 2012-8, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    3. Pies, Ingo, 2011. "Wie kommt die Normativität ins Spiel? Eine ordonomische Argumentationsskizze," Discussion Papers 2011-13, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    4. repec:zbw:iamodp:158731 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Pies, Ingo, 2011. "Die zwei Pathologien der Moderne: Eine ordonomische Argumentationsskizze," Discussion Papers 2011-14, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:zbw:iamost:200287 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Loy, Jens-Peter & Schmitz, P. Michael & Glauben, Thomas & Djuric, Ivan & Götz, Linde & Pàll, Zsombor & Perekhozhuk, Oleksandr & Prehn, Sören & Renner, Swetlana & Hermann, Roland & Pies, Ingo & Will, M, 2014. "Marktwirtschaftliche Koordination: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen. Symposium anlässlich des 75. Geburtstages von Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Ulrich Koester," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies 200287, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    3. Loy, Jens-Peter (ed.), 2014. "Marktwirtschaftliche Koordination: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen. Symposium anlässlich des 75. Geburtstages von Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Ulrich Koester," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 77, number 77.
    4. Pies, Ingo, 2012. "Optimierung versus Koordinierung: Zur ordonomischen Klärung des wirtschaftsethischen Problems," Discussion Papers 2012-21, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    5. Prehn Sören & Glauben Thomas & Pies Ingo & Will Matthias & Loy Jens-Peter, 2013. "Betreiben Indexfonds Agrarspekulation? Erläuterungen zum Geschäftsmodell und zum weiteren Forschungsbedarf / Do Index Funds Speculate on Agricultural Futures Markets? Explanatory Notes on the Business," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 64(1), pages 421-442, January.
    6. Pies, Ingo, 2013. "Personen, Organisationen, Ordnungsregeln: Der demokratische Diskurs muss zwei Defizite aufarbeiten - ein Interview zur Bankenmoral," Discussion Papers 2013-18, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    7. Pies, Ingo, 2013. "Ethik der Welternährung," Discussion Papers 2013-27, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    8. Pies, Ingo, 2014. "F. A. von Hayek und die moralische Qualität des Wettbewerbs," Discussion Papers 2014-12, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    9. Pies, Ingo, 2011. "Regelkonsens statt Wertekonsens: Die Grundidee des politischen Liberalismus," Discussion Papers 2011-20, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    10. Prehn, Sören & Glauben, Thomas & Pies, Ingo & Will, Matthias Georg & Loy, Jens-Peter, 2013. "Betreiben Indexfonds Agrarspekulation? Erläuterungen zum Geschäftsmodell und zum weiteren Forschungsbedarf [Do index funds speculate on agricultural futures markets? Explanatory notes on the busine," IAMO Discussion Papers 138, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    11. repec:zbw:iamodp:158731 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Will, Matthias Georg & Pies, Ingo, 2014. "Insiderhandel und die Regulierung der Kapitalmärkte: Ein Beitrag zur MiFID-Debatte," Discussion Papers 2014-7, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    13. Will Matthias Georg & Pies Ingo, 2014. "Insiderhandel und die Neuordnung der Kapitalmärkte: Ein Beitrag zur Regulierungsdebatte in Europa / Insider Trade and the New Ordering of Capital Markets: A Contribution to the Regulatory Debate in Eu," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 65(1), pages 159-182, January.
    14. Pies, Ingo, 2015. "Kommentar zur Spekulation mit Agrarrohstoffen: Eine Replik auf Christian Conrad," Discussion Papers 2015-11, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    15. Pies, Ingo, 2015. "Individualethik versus Institutionenethik? - Zur Moral (in) der Marktwirtschaft," Discussion Papers 2015-7, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    16. Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan, 2012. "Gründe versus Anreize? Ein ordonomischer Werkstattbericht in sechs Thesen," Discussion Papers 2012-8, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    17. Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan, 2013. "(Verhaltens-)Ökonomik versus (Ordnungs-)Ethik? Zum moralischen Stellenwert von Dispositionen und Institutionen," Discussion Papers 2013-22, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:201312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wwhalde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.