Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

The impact of downward rating momentum on credit portfolio risk


Author Info

  • Güttler, André
  • Raupach, Peter


Rating downgrades are known to make subsequent downgrades more likely. We analyze the impact of this ?downward momentum? on credit portfolio risk. Using S&P ratings from 1996 to 2005, we estimate a transition matrix that is insensitive to and a second matrix that is sensitive to previous downgrades. We then derive differences between the insensitive portfolio Value-at-Risk (VaR) and the momentum-sensitive VaR. We find realistic scenarios where investors who rely on insensitive transition matrices underestimate the VaR by eight percent of the correct value. The result is relevant for risk managers and regulators since banks neglecting the downward rating momentum might hold insufficient capital. -- In der Analyse von Ratingänderungen spricht man von einem Ratingimpuls (rating momentum), wenn die Wahrscheinlichkeit zukünftiger Ratingänderungen und Ausfälle nicht nur vom aktuellen Rating, sondern auch von früheren Ratingänderungen abhängt. Für Herabstufungen ist ein Ratingimpuls vielfach empirisch belegt: Innerhalb einer Ratingklasse haben die Anleihen mit vorangegangenen Herabstufungen eine höhere Ausfallwahrscheinlichkeit und eine höhere Wahrscheinlichkeit, herabgestuft zu werden, als solche ohne vorangegangene Herabstufungen. Dieser Ratingimpuls hat einen Einfluss auf das Wertänderungsrisiko eines Anleihenportfolios: Vergleicht man zwei Portfolios mit gleicher Ratingzusammensetzung, von denen das erste einen hohen Anteil zuvor herabgestufter Anleihen hat und das zweite einen geringen, dann sind im ersten Portfolio mehr Ausfälle und Barwertverluste durch die Neubewertung nach Herabstufungen zu erwarten als im zweiten. Wir messen den Einfluss des Ratingimpulses auf das Kreditportfoliorisiko unter möglichst realistischen Annahmen. Mit Standard-and-Poor?s-Daten von 1996 bis 2005 schätzen wir zunächst eine Ratingmigrationsmatrix, die den Ratingimpuls berücksichtigt, und eine Matrix, die den Impuls ignoriert. Anschließend verwenden wir die Matrizen in einem Kreditportfoliomodell vom Typ CreditMetricsŽ und berechnen Unterschiede zwischen dem Value-at-Risk (VaR) mit und ohne Berücksichtigung des Ratingimpulses, wobei wir ersteren als richtig ansehen. Wir nehmen dabei an, dass der Portfoliomanager das aktuelle Rating, aber nicht den Ratingimpuls beachtet, also rein zufällig einige zuvor herabgestufte Anleihen ausgewählt hat. Wir gewinnen damit ein Risikomaß für die Fehleinschätzung des VaR. Es zeigt sich, dass ohne Berücksichtigung des Ratingimpulses der VaR von 6,7 % den korrekten VaR mit Ratingimpuls im Mittel um 0,24 % des Portfoliovolumens (3,5 % des richtigen VaR) unterschätzt. Bedeutsamer sind aber die erheblichen Schwankungen: Unter normalen Bedingungen gibt es eine Wahrscheinlichkeit von 5 %, dass der VaR ohne Ratingimpuls den korrekten VaR um mehr als 0,59 % (8,1 % des richtigen VaR) unterschätzt; in einer ökonomischen Stress-Situation kann der Fehler leicht 1,8 % (6.8 % des richtigen VaR) betragen. Das Ergebnis ist relevant für Risikomanager und Bankenaufseher, denn Banken, die den Ratingimpuls vernachlässigen, halten möglicherweise nicht ausreichend Kapital vor.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Deutsche Bundesbank, Research Centre in its series Discussion Paper Series 2: Banking and Financial Studies with number 2008,16.

as in new window
Date of creation: 2008
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:zbw:bubdp2:7326

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Postfach 10 06 02, 60006 Frankfurt
Phone: 0 69 / 95 66 - 34 55
Fax: 0 69 / 95 66 30 77
Web page:
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: Rating drift; Downward momentum; Credit portfolio risk; Value-at-Risk;

Find related papers by JEL classification:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Jacobson, Tor & Lindé, Jesper & Roszbach, Kasper, 2003. "Internal Ratings Systems, Implied Credit Risk and the Consistency of Banks’ Risk Classification Policies," Working Paper Series 155, Sveriges Riksbank (Central Bank of Sweden).
  2. repec:fth:pennfi:67 is not listed on IDEAS
  3. Loffler, Gunter, 2003. "The effects of estimation error on measures of portfolio credit risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(8), pages 1427-1453, August.
  4. Marshall E. Blume & Felix Lim & A. Craig MacKinlay, . "The Declining Credit Quality of US Corporate Debt: Myth or Reality?," Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research Working Papers 03-98, Wharton School Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research.
  5. Jose A. Lopez, 2002. "The empirical relationship between average asset correlation, firm probability of default and asset size," Working Paper Series 2002-05, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
  6. Anil Bangia & Francis X. Diebold & Til Schuermann, 2000. "Ratings Migration and the Business Cycle, With Application to Credit Portfolio Stress Testing," Center for Financial Institutions Working Papers 00-26, Wharton School Center for Financial Institutions, University of Pennsylvania.
  7. Hanson, Samuel & Schuermann, Til, 2006. "Confidence intervals for probabilities of default," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(8), pages 2281-2301, August.
  8. Nickell, Pamela & Perraudin, William & Varotto, Simone, 2000. "Stability of rating transitions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 24(1-2), pages 203-227, January.
  9. Mark Carey, 2000. "Dimensions of credit risk and their relationship to economic capital requirements," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2000-18, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
  10. Merton, Robert C, 1974. "On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 29(2), pages 449-70, May.
  11. Marshall E. Blume & Felix Lim & A. Craig MacKinlay, . "The Declining Credit Quality of US Corporate Debt: Myth or Reality?," Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research Working Papers 3-98, Wharton School Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research.
  12. Marshall E. Blume & Felix Lim & A. Craig Mackinlay, 1998. "The Declining Credit Quality of U.S. Corporate Debt: Myth or Reality?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 53(4), pages 1389-1413, 08.
  13. Krüger, Ulrich & Stötzel, Martin & Trück, Stefan, 2005. "Time series properties of a rating system based on financial ratios," Discussion Paper Series 2: Banking and Financial Studies 2005,14, Deutsche Bundesbank, Research Centre.
  14. Christensen, Jens H.E. & Hansen, Ernst & Lando, David, 2004. "Confidence sets for continuous-time rating transition probabilities," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(11), pages 2575-2602, November.
  15. Lando, David & Skodeberg, Torben M., 2002. "Analyzing rating transitions and rating drift with continuous observations," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(2-3), pages 423-444, March.
  16. Mahlmann, Thomas, 2006. "Estimation of rating class transition probabilities with incomplete data," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(11), pages 3235-3256, November.
  17. Mark Carey, 2000. "Dimensions of Credit Risk and Their Relationship to Economic Capital Requirements," NBER Working Papers 7629, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Paul Welfens, 2010. "Transatlantic banking crisis: analysis, rating, policy issues," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 3-48, May.


This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.


Access and download statistics


When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:bubdp2:7326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.