This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

The Lucas Critique and Keynes Response.Considering the History of Macroeconomics

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Elke Muchlinski (Freie Universität Berlin)
Abstract

Considering the history of macroeconomics it is surprising that Tinbergens theory of policy is identified with so-called Keynesian economics by Lucas and Lucasians. Keynesian macropolicy is accused of neglecting the role of expectations and the effects of any changes of institutions. Due to textual evidence this paper explains that both the disregard of expectations and the institutional evolutionary process can not be addressed to Keynes's analysis.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://129.3.20.41/eps/mac/papers/0503/0503019.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by EconWPA in its series Macroeconomics with number 0503019.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Length: 33 pages
Date of creation: 23 Mar 2005
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpma:0503019

Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 33
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://129.3.20.41

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (EconWPA).

Related research
Keywords: Keynes on expectations macroeconomics and modelbuildung contra Lucas and Tinbergen

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:
B - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology
B - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology
B - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. David C. Colander, 1993. "The Macrofoundations of Micro," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 19(4), pages 447-457, Fall. [Downloadable!]
  2. Lawson, Tony, 1995. "The 'Lucas Critique': A Generalisation," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 257-76, April.
  3. David C. Colander, 1993. "The Macrofoundations of Micro," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 447-457, Fall. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  4. Morishima, Michio, 1991. "General Equilibrium Theory in the Twenty-First Century," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 101(404), pages 69-74, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  5. Sargent, Thomas J., 1996. "Expectations and the nonneutrality of Lucas," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 535-548, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  6. Stiglitz, Joseph, 1997. "Reflections on the Natural Rate Hypothesis," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 11(1), pages 3-10, Winter. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  7. Lucas, Robert Jr, 1976. "Econometric policy evaluation: A critique," Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 19-46, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  8. Lucas, Robert Jr., 1986. "Principles of fiscal and monetary policy," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 117-134, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  9. Kirman, Alan, 1989. "The Intrinsic Limits of Modern Economic Theory: The Emperor Has No Clothes," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 99(395), pages 126-39, Supplemen. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  10. Alex Cukierman, 2002. "Are contemporary central banks transparent about economic models and objectives and what difference does it make?," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, issue Jul, pages 15-36. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  11. Boland, Lawrence A, 1998. "Knowledge in Economics: Game-Theoretic versus Market-Process: A Review Article," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 45(5), pages 604-13, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  12. Kirman, Alan P, 1992. "Whom or What Does the Representative Individual Represent?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 6(2), pages 117-36, Spring. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  13. Kydland, Finn E & Prescott, Edward C, 1977. "Rules Rather Than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 85(3), pages 473-91, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  14. Summers, Lawrence H, 1991. " The Scientific Illusion in Empirical Macroeconomics," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 93(2), pages 129-48.
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You too can volunteer for RePEc, for example by editing a NEP report.

This page was last updated on 2008-10-3.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.