Distribution of income and the income tax burden in Bulgaria
AbstractUsing the 1992 Bulgarian household budget survey, the authors analyze the distribution of income and of the income tax burden by income and expenditure class and by rural-urban sector. They find: 1) Low income inequality (although that is changing rapidly). 2) A progressive income tax system. The poor (the lowest two-income decile) pay only 1.4 percent of their per capita income in income tax; the rich (the top decile) pay nearly 6 percent. In-kind income and expenditures are excluded from taxation. 3) The urban sector pays proportionately more in taxes than the rural sector. For example, urban households pay 5.3 percent of their per capita income in income tax, whereas the rural sector pays 2.4 percent. 3) Income tax contributes significantly to reducing income inequality at both the national and sectoral (rural-urban) level, as the poor pay a smaller share of taxes than their share of national income. These results hold whether income or expenditure is used as an indicator of economic well-being. The authors caution that as in-kind income becomes monetized and the economy becomes more market-oriented, the system will become less progressive and urban-rural differences will diminish. They contend that the bias toward higher urban taxes is justified to some extent by the fact that urban households benefit more from government services than rural households do.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by The World Bank in its series Policy Research Working Paper Series with number 1421.
Date of creation: 28 Feb 1995
Date of revision:
Payment Systems&Infrastructure; Environmental Economics&Policies; Public Sector Economics&Finance; Economic Theory&Research; Income; Environmental Economics&Policies; Economic Theory&Research; Income; Inequality; Governance Indicators;
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- James M. Poterba, 1991.
"Is the Gasoline Tax Regressive?,"
in: Tax Policy and the Economy, Volume 5, pages 145-164
National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Poterba, J.M., 1990. "Is The Gasoline Tax Regressive?," Working papers, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Department of Economics 568, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Department of Economics.
- James M. Poterba, 1991. "Is the Gasoline Tax Regressive?," NBER Working Papers 3578, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Ravallion, M., 1992. "Poverty Comparisons - A Guide to Concepts and Methods," Papers, World Bank - Living Standards Measurement 88, World Bank - Living Standards Measurement.
- Christian E. Weller & Manita Rao, 2008. "Can Progressive Taxation Contribute to Economic Development?," Working Papers, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst wp176, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Roula I. Yazigi).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.