This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Intergenerational justice when future worlds are uncertain

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Humberto Llavador ()
John E. Roemer
Joaquim Silvestre

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

We study the problem of intergenerational welfare maximization when the existence of future worlds is uncertain. One of the major examples of this problem today concerns global warming, and how to structure resource use intertemporally in its presence. The theoretical issues raised by uncertainty are quite complex, and in the interest of clarity, we will study only two simple models in this article – and neither of them explicitly models the effect of production on the biosphere and global temperature. In a companion paper (Llavador, Roemer, and Silvestre, 2009), we study a more complex version of the second model of this article, which does take into account the biosphere as a renewable resource: but that paper studies only the case with no uncertainty concerning the existence of future generations. The conclusions of the present paper suggest some inferences for the more complex problem. We study several (intergenerational) social welfare functions: utilitarian, Rawlsian, ‘extended Rawlsian,’ and ‘Rawlsian with growth.’ The Rawlsian function is identified with the view of sustainability, in a model with production.1 Sustainability, in our parlance, means sustaining human welfare over time at the highest possible level. This is often called ‘weak sustainability,’ to be contrasted with ‘strong sustainability’, which advocates sustaining the physical stock of bio-resources – species variety, forests, and so on. (See, for instance, Neumayer, 2003, and the articles in Asheim, 2007.) In another dimension, it is to be contrasted with the discountedutilitarian approach, which does not advocate sustaining human welfare over time, but rather the maximization of a weighted sum of generational welfare levels.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.econ.upf.edu/docs/papers/downloads/1178.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function: Whole Paper
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra in its series Economics Working Papers with number 1178.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: Oct 2009
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:upf:upfgen:1178

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.econ.upf.edu/

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: ().

Related research
Keywords: Discounted utilitarianism; Rawlsian; sustainability; maximin; uncertainty; expected utility; von Neumann-Morgenstern; dynamic welfare maximization;

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:
D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
O40 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - General
Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters
Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounting

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
  1. Humberto Llavador & John E. Roemer & Joaquim Silvestre, 2009. "A Dynamic Analysis of Human Welfare in a Warming Planet," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1673R, Cowles Foundation, Yale University. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? RePEc stands for Research Papers in Economics.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-20.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.