Social background's effect of educational attainment: Does method matter?
AbstractSocial background directly impacts educational choice and attainment, but also influences choice and attainment indirectly by affecting school performance. Boudon (1974) described this relationship as primary (indirect) and secondary (direct) effects of social stratification. Based on this approach and Mareâ€™s sequential transition model, we decompose this impact to analyze these effectsâ€™ relative importance at various stages over the school career. Using Dutch panel data of three school cohorts, we can assess whether primary and secondary effectsâ€™ relative importance has been stable over time. We use different statistical methods to assess the resultsâ€™ robustness. Our findings show secondary effects have a decreasing impact at the first transition over time but a rather stable and in some cases increasing impact at the educational careerâ€™s later stages. As a result, the cumulative share of secondary effects on educational attainment is stable over time, at least if one examines the last two cohorts. When using ordinary least squares (OLS) or counterfactual models, secondary effects amount to some 55% of social backgroundâ€™s total effect. However, using structural equation modeling that allows for taking into account measurement error in performance tests and social background, secondary effectsâ€™ relative importance amounts to some 45%. This result suggests method does matter for numerical closeness. Nevertheless, the findings of all models used in this study point in the same direction and suggest that preferences and expectations of aspiring higher educational levels remain strongly associated with social background.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Maastricht University, Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA) in its series ROA Research Memorandum with number 001.
Date of creation: 2013
Date of revision:
Hypothesis Testing: General; Analysis of Education; Education and Inequality;
Other versions of this item:
- Wolbers M.H.J. & Velden R.K.W. van der & BÃ¼chner C.I.R., 2013. "Social background's effect on educational attainment: does method matter?," Research Memorandum 005, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
- C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General
- I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
- I24 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Education and Inequality
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Charles Bollen).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.