Child care and female employment decisions: A theoretical note
Abstract
The empirical literature is divided over the issue of whether child care costs are a significant barrier to female employment. In this paper we develop a theoretical model that contributes to the literature (1) by allocating mother's time between work, leisure and child care and (2) by introducing the possibility of uncertainty in second period income because of a greater probability of divorce. We examine how these changes affect decisions on labour supply and purchase of child care. We show that although an increase in the price of child care reduces the demand for child care, it has an ambiguous impact on female employment decisions. From a policy point of view, this implies that government subsidies aimed at mitigating the cost of child care, may not have their desired impact in encouraging greater female labour force participation. However, an increase in the probability of child care unambiguously increases female labour supply and purchase of child care.Download Info
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.Bibliographic Info
Paper provided by University of Sydney, School of Economics in its series Working Papers with number 3.Length:
Date of creation: Jul 2004
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:syd:wpaper:2123/7641
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Sydney, NSW 2006
Phone: 61 +2 9351 5055
Fax: 61 +2 9351 4341
Email:
Web page: http://sydney.edu.au/arts/economics
More information through EDIRC
Related research
Keywords: childcare; female labour supply;References
No references listed on IDEASYou can help add them by filling out this form.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.Cited by:
- Guyonne Kalb & Wang-Sheng Lee, 2008.
"Childcare Use And Parents' Labour Supply In Australia ,"
Australian Economic Papers,
Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 272-295, 09.
- Guyonne Kalb & Wang-Sheng Lee, 2007. "Childcare Use and Parents’ Labour Supply in Australia," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2007n13, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
- Robert Breunig & Xiaodong Gong & Anthony King, 2012.
"Partnered Women's Labour Supply and Child‐Care Costs in Australia: Measurement Error and the Child‐Care Price,"
The Economic Record,
The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 88(s1), pages 51-69, 06.
- Xiaodong Gong & Robert Breunig & Anthony King, 2011. "Partnered women's labour supply and child care costs in Australia: Measurement error and the child care price," NATSEM Working Paper Series 11/13, University of Canberra, National Centre for Social and Economic Modelling.
- Xiaodong Gong & Robert Breuing & Anthony King, 2011. "Partnered women’s labour supply and child care costs in Australia: measurement error and the child care price," CEPR Discussion Papers 652, Centre for Economic Policy Research, Research School of Economics, Australian National University.
- Yin King Fok & Sung-Hee Jeon & Roger Wilkins, 2009. "Does Part-Time Employment Help or Hinder Lone Mothers Movements into Full-Time Employment?," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2009n25, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
- Chikako Yamauchi, 2009.
"The Availability of Child Care Centers, Perceived Search Costs and Parental Life Satisfaction,"
CEPR Discussion Papers
620, Centre for Economic Policy Research, Research School of Economics, Australian National University.
- Chikako Yamauchi, 2010. "The availability of child care centers, perceived search costs and parental life satisfaction," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 231-253, June.
- Xiaodong Gong & Robert Breunig & Anthony King, 2010. "New estimates of the relationship between female labour supply and the cost, availability, and quality of child care," Economic Roundup, Treasury, Australian Government, issue 1, pages 51-62, April.
Lists
This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:syd:wpaper:2123/7641For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Vanessa Holcombe).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

