Longevity-adjusted growth rates are computed for Belgium over the period 1867-1997, by using a method based on contributions by Usher (1973a, 1980), Williamson (1984) and Miller (2000). Adjusted growth rates substantially differ from conventional figures, which may have tended to underestimate actual well-being improvements, especially during the second half of the 20th century. The analysis of the size of the adjustments, size which varies across periods, reveals that the post-1974 growth slowdown might have been less severe, in terms of social well-being, than suggested by usual measures. Our results, being robust to the introduction of some degree of endogeneity of longevity, seem to avoid the double-counting criticism. Several shortcomings of our method are discussed and some directions are proposed for future research. It is concluded that, thanks to their richer informational basis, longevity-adjusted growth rates constitute promising indicators to complement usual growth measures in the study of social well-being evolution over time.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Centre de Recherche en Economie Publique et de la Population (CREPP) (Research Center on Public and Population Economics) HEC-Management School, University of Liège in its series CREPP Working Papers with number
0403.
Did you know? Each page is provided with a technical contact, in case something is not right with the supplied information. See under "publisher info".