IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ris/prodsw/0601.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Armington Elasticities and Terms of Trade Effects in Global CGE Models

Author

Listed:
  • Xiao-guang Zhang

    (Productivity Commission)

Abstract

A Productivity Commission Staff Working Paper, Armington Elasticities and Terms of Trade Effects in Global CGE Models by Xiao-guang Zhang was released on 8 February 2006, in conjunction with the staff working paper, The Armington Model. Armington elasticities specify the degrees of substitution in demand between similar products produced in different countries. They are critical parameters which, along with model structure, data and other parameters, determine the results of policy experiments. Especially when many tariffs are small, trade liberalisation simulations can produce positive or negative welfare outcomes depending on the values assumed for Armington elasticities. The Commission developed a research program on the role of Armington elasticities in quantitative models that are commonly used to analyse trade issues. The research program was designed to improve the effectiveness of models used in analysing various options for unilateral, bilateral and multilateral liberalisation. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the effects of the Armington assumption on one of the main factors that affects welfare outcomes, namely, the terms of trade. In publishing its research in this area, the Commission hopes to clarify issues that arise as single-country and global trade models are increasingly used to assess the potential impacts of various types of trade liberalisation. The views expressed in this paper are those of the staff involved and do not necessarily reflect those of the Productivity Commission.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiao-guang Zhang, 2006. "Armington Elasticities and Terms of Trade Effects in Global CGE Models," Staff Working Papers 0601, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:prodsw:0601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pc.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0014/60404/armingtonelasticities.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.pc.gov.au/research/staffworkingpaper/armingtonelasticities
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McDaniel, Christine A. & Balistreri, Edward J., 2002. "A Discussion on Armington Trade Substitution Elasticities," Working Papers 15856, United States International Trade Commission, Office of Economics.
    2. Hertel, Thomas & Hummels, David & Ivanic, Maros & Keeney, Roman, 2007. "How confident can we be of CGE-based assessments of Free Trade Agreements?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 611-635, July.
    3. Hertel, Thomas & Hummels, David & Ivanic, Maros & Keeney, Roman, 2007. "How confident can we be of CGE-based assessments of Free Trade Agreements?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 611-635, July.
    4. Shoven,John B. & Whalley,John, 1992. "Applying General Equilibrium," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521266550.
    5. Brown, Drusilla K., 1987. "Tariffs, the terms of trade, and national product differentiation," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 503-526.
    6. Bhattarai, Keshab & Ghosh, Madanmohan & Whalley, John, 1999. "On some properties of a trade closure widely used in numerical modelling," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 13-21, January.
    7. Unknown, 2001. "General Discussion," Proceedings of the 6th Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshop, 2000: Trade Liberalization Under NAFTA: Report Card on Agriculture 16839, Farm Foundation, Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshops.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lalanne, Alvaro & Sánchez, Guillermo, 2020. "Evaluación del impacto de acuerdos comerciales: metodologías, experiencias internacionales y aplicaciones para el caso uruguayo," Estudios y Perspectivas – Oficina de la CEPAL en Montevideo 45070, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    2. Wesseh, Presley K. & Lin, Boqiang, 2019. "Environmental policy and ‘double dividend’ in a transitional economy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    3. Evans, David & Gasiorek, Michael & McDonald, Scott & Robinson, Sherman, 2006. "Trade Liberalisation with Trade Induced Technical Change in Morocco and Egypt: Findings and Wider Research Implications," Conference papers 331529, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    4. Ballingall, John & Giesecke, James & Zuccollo, James, 2010. "Tariffs in New Zealand," NZIER Working Paper 2010/1, New Zealand Institute of Economic Research.
    5. Georges, Patrick & Mérette, Marcel, 2011. "Trade Diversification Away from the U.S. or North American Customs Union? A Review of Canada’s Trade Policy Options," Conference papers 332084, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    6. Romain Perez & Mustapha Sadni Jallab, 2009. "Preference erosion and market access liberalization: the African dilemma in multilateral negotiations on agriculture," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 145(2), pages 277-292, July.
    7. Delahaye, Elliot & Milot, Catherine, 2020. "Measuring the UK Economy’s Armington Elasticities," Conference papers 333170, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    8. Phouphet Kyophilavong & Michael C. S. Wong & Somchith Souksavath & Bin Xiong, 2017. "Impacts of trade liberalization with China and Chinese FDI on Laos: evidence from the CGE model," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 215-228, July.
    9. He, Chuantian & Li, Chunding & Wang, Jing & Whalley, John, 2017. "The Armington assumption and the size of optimal tariffs," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 214-222.
    10. Richard G. Harris & Peter E. Robertson, 2007. "Dynamic Gains and Market Access Insurance: Another look at the AUSFTA," Discussion Papers 2007-23, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
    11. Romain Perez & Stephen Njuguna Karingi, 2007. "How to Balance the Outcomes of the Economic Partnership Agreements for Sub‐Saharan African Economies?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(12), pages 1877-1899, December.
    12. Ernesto Valenzuela & Kym Anderson & Thomas Hertel, 2008. "Impacts of trade reform: sensitivity of model results to key assumptions," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 395-420, February.
    13. Missaglia, Marco & Valensisi, Giovanni, 2014. "Trade policy in Palestine: A reassessment," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 899-923.
    14. Kenneth W. Clements & Marc Jim M. Mariano & George Verikios, 2021. "Foreign-domestic substitution, import penetration and CGE modelling," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(35), pages 4080-4099, July.
    15. Porto, Massimiliano, 2018. "Free Trade Agreements and import-import substitution effect: Evidence from a CGE analysis: the case of EU-Korea and EU-Japan FTAs," Conference papers 332936, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    16. Peter Lloyd & Xiao-guang Zhang, 2006. "The Armington Model," Staff Working Papers 0602, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia.
    17. Ainura Uzagalieva & Antonio Menezes, 2009. "The poverty effect of remittance flows: evidence from Georgia," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 453-474.
    18. Mérette Marcel & Georges Patrick, 2010. "Demographic Changes and the Gains from Globalisation: An Analysis of Ageing, Capital Flows, and International Trade," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 10(3), pages 1-39, October.
    19. Sonmez, Yontem & McDonald, Scott & Walmsley, Terrie, 2011. "Augmenting the GTAP Database: Are the Data on Intra Institutional Transactions Important?," Conference papers 332085, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    20. Gharibnavaz, M. Reza & Waschik, Robert, 2012. "A General Equilibrium Analysis of Alternative Scenarios for Food and Energy Subsidy Reforms in Iran," Conference papers 332241, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    21. Banse, Martin & Faaij, Andre & Hoefnagels, Ric & Dornburg, Veronika, 2009. "Analysis of the Economic Impact of Large-Scale Deployment of Biomass Resources for Energy and Materials in the Netherlands," Conference papers 331902, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    22. Georges, Patrick & Lisenkova, Katerina & Mérette, Marcel, 2013. "Can the ageing North benefit from expanding trade with the South?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 990-998.
    23. Richard G. Harris & Peter E. Robertson, 2009. "Dynamic Gains and Market Access Insurance: Another Look at the Australia–US Free Trade Agreement," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 42(4), pages 435-452, December.
    24. Changbo Qin & Z.(Bob) Su & Hans Th.A. Bressers & Yangwen Jia & Hao Wang, 2013. "Assessing the economic impact of North China's water scarcity mitigation strategy: a multi-region, water-extended computable general equilibrium analysis," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(6), pages 701-723, October.
    25. Nin Pratt, Alejandro & Diao, Xinshen, 2008. "Exploring Growth Linkages and Market Opportunities for Agriculture in Southern Africa," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 23, pages 104-137.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Minghao & Balistreri, Edward J. & Zhang, Wendong, 2020. "The U.S.–China trade war: Tariff data and general equilibrium analysis," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    2. Osman, Rehab Osman Mohamed, 2012. "The EU Economic Partnership Agreements with Southern Africa: a computable general equilibrium analysis," Economics PhD Theses 0412, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    3. Arief Anshory Yusuf, 2008. "INDONESIA-E3: An Indonesian Applied General Equilibrium Model for Analyzing the Economy, Equity, and the Environment," Working Papers in Economics and Development Studies (WoPEDS) 200804, Department of Economics, Padjadjaran University, revised Sep 2008.
    4. Hanson, Kenneth & Somwaru, Agapi, 2003. "Distributional Effects of U.S. Farm Commodity Programs: Accounting for Farm and Non-Farm Households," Conference papers 331120, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    5. Marilyne Huchet‐Bourdon & Esmaeil Pishbahar, 2009. "Armington Elasticities and Tariff Regime: An Application to European Union Rice Imports," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 586-603, September.
    6. Xavier Labandeira & Miguel Rodriguez, 2004. "The Effects of a Sudden CO2 reduction in Spain," Others 0412001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Michael Plummer & Frank Harrigan & Fan Zhai & Patrick Messerlin, 2006. "The Doha Development Agenda: Asian Challenges and Prospects after the Ministerial Meeting in Hong Kong, China," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/8132, Sciences Po.
    8. repec:dar:wpaper:35491 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. McCleery, Robert & DePaolis, Fernando, 2014. "So you want to build a trade model? Available resources and critical choices," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 199-207.
    10. Willenbockel, Dirk, 2004. "Specification choice and robustness in CGE trade policy analysis with imperfect competition," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 1065-1099, December.
    11. Nabil Annabi & John Cockburn & Bernard Decaluwé, 2006. "Functional Forms and Parametrization of CGE Models," Working Papers MPIA 2006-04, PEP-MPIA.
    12. Michael Plummer & Frank Harrigan & Fan Zhai & Patrick Messerlin, 2006. "The Doha Development Agenda: Asian Challenges and Prospects after the Ministerial Meeting in Hong Kong, China," SciencePo Working papers hal-03462128, HAL.
    13. Axel Borrmann & Matthias Busse & Manuel De La Rocha, 2007. "Consequences of Economic Partnership Agreements between East and Southern African Countries and the EU for Inter- and Intra-regional Integration," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 233-253.
    14. Timilsina, Govinda & Steinbuks, Jevgenijs, 2021. "Economic costs of electricity load shedding in Nepal," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    15. Behrman, Jere R., 2009. "Analyzing the Distributional Impact of Reforms, Volume Two: A Practitioner's Guide to Pension, Health, Labor Market, Public Sector Downsizing, Taxation, Decentralization, and Macroeconomic Modeling. A," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 396-397, July.
    16. Jose Tongzon, 2001. "China's membership in the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the exports of the developing economies of East Asia: a computable general equilibrium approach," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(15), pages 1943-1959.
    17. Arjan Lejour & Paul Veenendaal & Gerard Verweij & Nico van Leeuwen, 2006. "Worldscan; a model for international economic policy analysis," CPB Document 111.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    18. Carbone, Jared C. & Helm, Carsten & Rutherford, Thomas F., 2009. "The case for international emission trade in the absence of cooperative climate policy," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 266-280, November.
    19. Mario Holzner, 2004. "GSIM Measurement of the Costs of Protection in Southeast Europe," wiiw Balkan Observatory Working Papers 55, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    20. Kuo‐I CHANG & Kazunobu HAYAKAWA, 2010. "Border Barriers In Agricultural Trade And The Impact Of Their Elimination: Evidence From East Asia," The Developing Economies, Institute of Developing Economies, vol. 48(2), pages 232-246, June.
    21. Johannes Ziesmer & Ding Jin & Sneha D Thube & Christian Henning, 2023. "A Dynamic Baseline Calibration Procedure for CGE models," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 61(4), pages 1331-1368, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    armington elasticities; terms of trade effects; trade liberalisation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F - International Economics
    • Z - Other Special Topics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:prodsw:0601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MAPS (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pcgovau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.