This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

The Influence of Social Preferences on Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Energy Scenarios

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Omann, Ines () (Sustainable Europe Research Institute (SERI))
Kowalski, Katharina () (Bundesministerium fuer Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft)
Bohunovsky, Lisa () (Sustainable Europe Research Institute (SERI))
Madlener, Reinhard () (E.ON Energy Research Center, Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN))
Stagl, Sigrid () (SPRU-Science and Technology Policy Research)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

Participatory multi-criteria evaluation (MCE) is increasingly used for the integrated assessment of future scenarios. Determining weights of the different criteria constitutes one of the biggest challenges of MCE. This paper investigates the influence of weights on the ranking of scenarios and reflects critically on the use of weights as representations of social preferences in participatory MCE. Conceptually, this exercise builds on the literature on integrated assessment and decision making under uncertainty; empirically, insights are drawn from two case studies of renewable energy scenario assessment for Austria at the national and local level. The analysis exhibits a robust ranking for the local level, especially for the highest ranked scenarios. In the national case study, the analysis finds two robust scenario clusters which never switch ranks, whereas the ranking of the scenarios within the clusters flips with minor alters in weights. This paper argues that in participatory MCE different sets of stakeholders' priorities can be taken into account in a transparent and robust manner. The discussion explores inhowfar weights represent social preferences better than direct ranking of alternative scenarios by stakeholders on the basis of scenario presentations.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.eonerc.rwth-aachen.de/global/show_document.asp?id=aaaaaaaaaabqxgi
File Format: application/pdf
File Function: Full text
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by E.ON Energy Research Center, Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN) in its series FCN Working Papers with number 3/2008.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 36 pages
Date of creation: Aug 2008
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ris:fcnwpa:2008_003

Contact details of provider:
Email:
Web page: http://www.eonerc.rwth-aachen.de/fcn
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Ronald Bernstein).

Related research
Keywords: social preferences; participatory multi-criteria evaluation; renewable energy; scenario analysis; sustainable energy systems;

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Authors registered on the RePEc Author Service receive monthly emails with details about downloads and abstract views of their works.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-6.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.