Wage and Productivity Dispersion: Labor Quality or Rent Sharing?
AbstractThe method introduced in this paper contributes to the estimation of production functions by embedding them in a structural equation system involving worker, firm, time, and occupation effects from an individual wage decomposition and accounting for labor input components that are substitutes and complements, while accommodating stochastically varying factor productivity. The structural model allows for differences in input quality as well as rent sharing, both of which may potentially help explain the observations that wage and labor productivity are dispersed across firms, and that more productive firms tend to pay higher wages. From our empirical results, which focus on the manufacturing sector only, both input heterogeneity and intrinsic differences in total factor productivity across firms are important for dispersion. We find that 41% of the dispersion in log value added per worker within the manufacturing sector is attributable to cross-firm differences in the levels of capital per worker, while another 39% of the variation stems from intrinsic TFP differences across firms. Only a smaller portion observed dispersion in log value added per worker (5s%) is associated with quality differences in the labor input. These results suggest that that there are major gains to reallocation of labor from firms with low marginal labor productivity to firms with high marginal labor productivity. The same would not be the case if the dispersion in marginal labor productivity were due to differences in labor quality alone. Rent sharing provide a link between individual wages and firms' marginal labor productivity and thus ties the dispersion in labor productivity to the wage distribution. Hence, rent sharing is a potentially important vehicle for reallocation as wage dispersion motivates job search. We provide a decomposition of individual log wages in the manufacturing sector and find that 70% of the individual log wage variation is due to individual characteristics, whereas only 13% is attributable to firm differences (i.e. rent sharing). The relatively small contribution of firm heterogeneity to individual wage dispersion is thus consistent with the inefficient allocation of labor across firms.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Society for Economic Dynamics in its series 2010 Meeting Papers with number 758.
Date of creation: 2010
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Society for Economic Dynamics Christian Zimmermann Economic Research Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis PO Box 442 St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
Web page: http://www.EconomicDynamics.org/society.htm
More information through EDIRC
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- John Kennes & Daniel le Maire, 2013. "Job Heterogeneity and Coordination Frictions," Economics Working Papers 2013-09, School of Economics and Management, University of Aarhus.
- Petri, Böckerman & Mika, Maliranta, 2012.
"Outsourcing, occupational restructuring, and employee well-being: Is there a silver lining?,"
38230, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Petri Böckerman & Mika Maliranta, 2013. "Outsourcing, Occupational Restructuring, and Employee Well-Being: Is There a Silver Lining?," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 878-914, October.
- Böckerman, Petri & Maliranta, Mika, 2012. "Outsourcing, occupational restructuring, and employee well-being: Is there a silver lining?," Discussion Papers 1271, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
- Böckerman, Petri & Maliranta, Mika, 2013. "Outsourcing, Occupational Restructuring, and Employee Well-Being: Is There a Silver Lining?," IZA Discussion Papers 7399, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
- Doan, Tinh & Nguyen, Ha, 2013. "Productivity dispersion and the roles of quality of labour input and competition: A case of Vietnamese manufacturing sector," MPRA Paper 48357, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Niehues, J. (Judith) & Andreas Peichl, 2012. "GINI DP 34: Bounds of Unfair Inequality of Opportunity: Theory and Evidence for Germany and the US," GINI Discussion Papers 34, AIAS, Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies.
- Judith Niehues & Andreas Peichl, 2011.
"Lower and upper bounds of unfair inequality: Theory and evidence for Germany and the US,"
216, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
- Judith Niehues & Andreas Peichl, 2011. "Lower and Upper Bounds of Unfair Inequality: Theory and Evidence for Germany and the US," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 395, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
- Niehues, Judith & Peichl, Andreas, 2011. "Lower and Upper Bounds of Unfair Inequality: Theory and Evidence for Germany and the US," IZA Discussion Papers 5834, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
- Judith Niehues & Andreas Peichl, 2012. "Bounds of Unfair Inequality of Opportunity: Theory and Evidence for Germany and the US," CESifo Working Paper Series 3815, CESifo Group Munich.
- Melvyn G. Coles & Dale T. Mortensen, 2012.
"Equilibrium Labor Turnover, Firm Growth and Unemployment,"
NBER Working Papers
18022, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Coles, Melvyn G. & Mortensen, Dale T., 2012. "Equilibrium labour turnover, firm growth and unemployment," ISER Working Paper Series 2012-07, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christian Zimmermann).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.