IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/34527.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Why anthropocentric organization models don't succeed in Portugal? A cultural perspective using Hofstede's cultural dimensions

Author

Listed:
  • Ferreira, Pedro

Abstract

In Europe, anthropocentric organization models – an updated version of the sociotechnique approach – had their maximum expression in the Swedish model, which came to be known as “uddevalism” or “volvoism”. Several factors were presented as conditioners of this success [1], and some critical factors to the success of that organization models were pointed out for the special case of LIMS (Less Industrialized Member States), such as Portugal. Furthermore, there is some evidence that stress the lack of success of anthropocentric models in Portugal. However, in any case, it wasn’t paid much attention to the importance of culture as a booster of the introduction of new organization models. The purpose of this paper is to assess the viability of the general and exploratory hypothesis that national culture is an important factor to consider in the success of new organization models. Considering that the example which best expresses the anthropocentric approach came from Sweden, this assessment will be based on the confrontation of Portuguese and Swedish cultural characteristics using Hofstede’s cultural dimensions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ferreira, Pedro, 2008. "Why anthropocentric organization models don't succeed in Portugal? A cultural perspective using Hofstede's cultural dimensions," MPRA Paper 34527, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:34527
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/34527/1/MPRA_paper_34527.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geert Hofstede, 1983. "The Cultural Relativity of Organizational Practices and Theories," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 14(2), pages 75-89, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Daojuan & Hain, Daniel S. & Larimo, Jorma & Dao, Li T., 2020. "Cultural differences and synergy realization in cross-border acquisitions," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(3).
    2. María Victoria Uribe‐Bohorquez & Jennifer Martínez‐Ferrero & Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez, 2019. "Women on boards and efficiency in a business‐orientated environment," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 82-96, January.
    3. Peter JANSEN & Gabriel Viorel RAITA, 2021. "Macro-Level Determinants of Board Effectiveness in UK and Romanian Listed Companies: A Conceptual Approach," CECCAR Business Review, Body of Expert and Licensed Accountants of Romania (CECCAR), vol. 2(10), pages 60-72, October.
    4. Yung-Heng Lee & Yann-Haur Huang & Mei-Jane Chan, 2009. "An Empirical Study Of Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries And Joint Ventures For Entry Into China Markets," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 3(2), pages 9-22.
    5. Oleksiuk Adam & Pleśniak Agnieszka, 2022. "Environment Characteristics and Internationalization of SMEs: Insights from a Polish and Finnish Sample," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 30(3), pages 175-194, September.
    6. Tröster, Christian & Mehra, Ajay & van Knippenberg, Daan, 2014. "Structuring for team success: The interactive effects of network structure and cultural diversity on team potency and performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 245-255.
    7. Zur, Andrew & Leckie, Civilai & Webster, Cynthia M., 2012. "Cognitive and affective trust between Australian exporters and their overseas buyers," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 73-79.
    8. Sebastian Schneider, 2022. "Price-related consumer discussions in China and the United States: a cross-cultural study investigating price perceptions and word-of-mouth transmission," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(3), pages 274-290, June.
    9. Fang, Tony & Fridh, Camilla & Schultzberg, Sara, 2004. "Why did the Telia-Telenor merger fail?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 13(5), pages 573-594, October.
    10. Mitzi Cubilla‐Montilla & Ana‐Belén Nieto‐Librero & Ma Purificación Galindo‐Villardón & Ma Purificación Vicente Galindo & Isabel‐María Garcia‐Sanchez, 2019. "Are cultural values sufficient to improve stakeholder engagement human and labour rights issues?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 938-955, July.
    11. Kowalewski, Oskar, 2023. "Effect of operating multiple affiliates on the performance of subsidiaries in the same host country," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    12. Stephen Guisinger, 2001. "From OLI to OLMA: Incorporating Higher Levels of Environmental and Structural Complexity into the Eclectic Paradigm," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 257-272.
    13. MILIJEVIC Srdjan & SKLAVOUNOS Nikolaos & ROTSIOS Konstantinos, 2020. "Consumers' Purchase Intentions Towards Novel Dairy Products: Evidence From Greece And Serbia," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 15(3), pages 152-167, December.
    14. Puck, Jonas F & Mohr, Alexander T & Holtbrügge, Dirk, 2006. "Cultural convergence through web-based management techniques? The case of corporate web site recruiting," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 181-195, June.
    15. Xiaomin Sun & Dan Xu & Fang Luo & Zihan Wei & Cong Wei & Gang Xue, 2015. "A Cross-Cultural Perspective on the Preference for Potential Effect: An Individual Participant Data (IPD) Meta-Analysis Approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-13, March.
    16. Laura Maria Ferri & Nelly Oelze & André Habisch & Mario Molteni, 2016. "Implementation of responsible Procurement Management: An Institutional Perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 261-276, May.
    17. Bernhard Fietz & Julia Hillmann & Edeltraud Guenther, 2021. "Cultural Effects on Organizational Resilience: Evidence from the NAFTA Region," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 73(1), pages 5-46, March.
    18. Wong, Christina W.Y. & Sancha, Cristina & Thomsen, Cristina Gimenez, 2017. "A national culture perspective in the efficacy of supply chain integration practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 554-565.
    19. Chow, Chee W. & Kato, Yutaka & Merchant, Kenneth A., 1996. "The use of organizational controls and their effects on data manipulation and management myopia: A Japan vs U.S. comparison," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 21(2-3), pages 175-192.
    20. Juan Antonio Moreno-Murcia & Elisa Huéscar Hernández & Luís Cid & Diogo Monteiro & Filipe Rodrigues & Diogo Teixeira & Jeanette M. López-Walle & Argenis Vergara-Torres & José Tristan & Gabriel Gastélu, 2020. "Assessing the Relationship between Autonomy Support and Student Group Cohesion across Ibero-American Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-12, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Management; Culture dimensions; Innovation; New organization models;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L23 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Organization of Production
    • M54 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - Labor Management

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:34527. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.