IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/102256.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ekonomia Sociale e Tregut si alternativë e Konsensusit të Uashingtonit në Ballkanin Perëndimor
[Social Market Economy as an alternative to the Washington Consensus in the Western Balkans]

Author

Listed:
  • Matoshi, Ruzhdi
  • Mulaj, Isa

Abstract

Pas gati tri decenieve që nga fillimi i transicionit nga komunizmi për në demokraci dhe ekonomi të hapur të tregut në Evropën Qendrore dhe Lindore (EQL), Konsensusi i Uashingtonit në përgjithësi e merr notën si dështim. Gjersa përvoja nga EQL përveç rezultateve të përbashkëta tregon ndryshime të konsiderueshme, pakoja e reformave është diskutabile edhe në perspektivën afatgjate, sidomos për shkak se prodhon kosto të lartë sociale. Emigrimet masive kohëve të fundit nga Ballkani Perëndimor për shkak të kushteve të dobëta ekonomike dhe nga Lindja e Mesme, e kanë rritur vëmendjen rreth kredibilitetit për eksportimin ose imponimin e demokracisë Amerikane, e së bashku me të, edhe Konsensusin e Uashingtonit si model të transformimit dhe zhvillimit ekonomik. Por a ekziston ndonjë alternativë? Pothuajse ka ekzistuar edhe para se të fillojnë ndryshime sistemore në EQL, dhe ajo mund të jetë më e parapëlqyer edhe tani për vendet të cilat ende kanë për të bërë transformime të konsiderueshme ekonomike. Ajo është Ekonomia Sociale e Tregut, modeli i së cilës ende mund të zbatohet në disa vende që kanë mbetur prapa në transicion. Ky punim shtjellon perspektivën e futjes dhe zbatimit të këtij modeli në vendet e Ballkanit Perëndimor, me theks të posaçëm në rolin e shtetit, tatimeve, shpërndarjes së të ardhurave dhe zvillimit të biznesit.

Suggested Citation

  • Matoshi, Ruzhdi & Mulaj, Isa, 2019. "Ekonomia Sociale e Tregut si alternativë e Konsensusit të Uashingtonit në Ballkanin Perëndimor [Social Market Economy as an alternative to the Washington Consensus in the Western Balkans]," MPRA Paper 102256, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:102256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/102256/1/MPRA_paper_102256.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sukiassyan, Grigor, 2007. "Inequality and growth: What does the transition economy data say?," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 35-56, March.
    2. Stanley Fischer & Ratna Sahay, 2000. "The Transition Economies After Ten Years," NBER Working Papers 7664, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Sergei Guriev & Ekaterina Zhuravskaya, 2009. "(Un)happiness in Transition," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 23(2), pages 143-168, Spring.
    4. Frye, Timothy & Shleifer, Andrei, 1997. "The Invisible Hand and the Grabbing Hand," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 87(2), pages 354-358, May.
    5. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/7fst0pcf5j8cr99e1nuobt97rn is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Mr. Stanley Fischer & Ms. Ratna Sahay, 2000. "The Transition Economies After Ten Years," IMF Working Papers 2000/030, International Monetary Fund.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matoshi, Ruzhdi & Mulaj, Isa, 2019. "Social Market Economy as an Alternative to the Washington Consensus in the Western Balkans," MPRA Paper 98460, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Jeffrey B. Nugent & Grigor. Sukiassyan, 2009. "Alternative Strategies For Firms In Oppressive And Corrupt States: Informality Or Formality Via Business Associations?," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 27(4), pages 423-439, October.
    3. Sergei Guriev & Barry W. Ickes, 2000. "Microeconomic Aspects of Economic Growth in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union, 1950-2000," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series 348, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
    4. Thomas Vendryes, 2014. "Peasants Against Private Property Rights: A Review Of The Literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 971-995, December.
    5. Vehrkamp, Robert B. & Hafemann, Klaus, 2005. "Korruption, Arbeitsmarkt und Beschäftigung: Ergebnisse einer empirischen Analyse für die osteuropäischen Transformationsländer," Beiträge zur angewandten Wirtschaftsforschung 9, University of Münster, Center of Applied Economic Research Münster (CAWM).
    6. Mübariz Hasanov & Tolga Omay, 2011. "The Relationship Between Inflation, Output Growth, and Their Uncertainties: Evidence from Selected CEE Countries," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(0), pages 5-20, July.
    7. Neimke, Markus, 2003. "Financial development and economic growth in transition countries," IEE Working Papers 173, Ruhr University Bochum, Institute of Development Research and Development Policy (IEE).
    8. Gylfason, Thorvaldur & Hochreiter, Eduard, 2009. "Growing apart? A tale of two republics: Estonia and Georgia," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 355-370, September.
    9. Tamilina, Larysa, 2014. "Податкова Політика Періоду Непу Та Індустріалізації [The politics of taxation in Ukraine during the new economic policy and industrialization]," MPRA Paper 96497, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Marek Dabrowski, 2001. "Currency Crises in Emerging Markets - Selected Comparative Studies," CASE Network Reports 0041, CASE-Center for Social and Economic Research.
    11. Marina Bakanova & L303272cio Vinhas de Souza, 2001. "Trade and Growth under Limited Liberalization, The Case of Belarus," International Trade 0108005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Ekaterina Vostroknutova, 2003. "Polish Stabilization: What can we learn from the I(2) Cointegration Analysis?," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 177-198, June.
    13. James Alm & Jorge Martinez‐Vazque & Benno Torgler, 2006. "Russian attitudes toward paying taxes – before, during, and after the transition," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(12), pages 832-857, December.
    14. Chousa, Juan Pineiro & Khan, Haider A. & Melikyan, Davit & Tamazian, Artur, 2005. "Assessing institutional efficiency, growth and integration," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 69-84, April.
    15. Iga Magda & David Marsden & Simone Moriconi, 2012. "Collective Agreements, Wages, and Firms' Cohorts: Evidence from Central Europe," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 65(3), pages 607-629, July.
    16. Pavel Kadochnikov, 2006. "An Analysis of Import Substitution in Russia after the 1998 Crisis," Research Paper Series, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, issue 95, pages 148-148.
    17. Alain Sand, 2005. "Structural reforms, macroeconomic policies and the future of Kazakhstan," Working Papers 0411, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
    18. Richard Auty, 2003. "Natural resources and ‘gradual’ reform in Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 27(4), pages 255-266, November.
    19. Thorvaldur Gylfason & Eduard Hochreiter, 2011. "Growing Together: Croatia and Latvia," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 53(2), pages 165-197, June.
    20. Challet, Damien & Solomon, Sorin & Yaari, Gur, 2009. "The universal shape of economic recession and recovery after a shock," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 3, pages 1-24.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Konsensusi i Uashingtonit; Ekonomia Sociale e Tregut; Ballkani Perëndimor; reformat ekonomike;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F63 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Economic Development
    • N40 - Economic History - - Government, War, Law, International Relations, and Regulation - - - General, International, or Comparative
    • O57 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Comparative Studies of Countries
    • P16 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Capitalist Institutions; Welfare State
    • P27 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - Performance and Prospects
    • P51 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Comparative Economic Systems - - - Comparative Analysis of Economic Systems

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:102256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.