This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Growth, Inequality and Social Protection

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Roman Arjona
Maxime Ladaique
Mark Pearson

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

  1. Economic growth is, ultimately, the result of the myriad of transactions which take place in a market economy. Similarly, the distribution of income depends on who has ownership of factors of production, how much they can sell them for, and whether the resultant income is redistributed or not. It would be surprising were economic growth and income distribution not to be linked. But how exactly they might be linked has been the topic of many competing theories and empirical evaluations. Unfortunately, the studies have not led to a convergence on a common view that there is, or is not, a trade-off between the two goals of an equitable society and a rich one.
  2. This lack of enlightenment becomes less surprising once the empirical studies are examined in detail. Many empirical studies have looked at the final distribution of income, when some of the theories make stronger predictions about the links between growth and the distribution of income before taxes and transfers; similar ...


  1. La croissance économique est, en fin de compte, la résultante des multiples transactions qui se déroulent dans une économie de marché. De même, la distribution du revenu dépend de l’identité des propriétaires des facteurs de production, du revenu qu’ils peuvent escompter de la vente de ces facteurs et du point de savoir si ce revenu est redistribué ou non. Il serait étonnant qu’il n’y ait pas de lien entre la croissance économique et la distribution du revenu. Quant à savoir quel est exactement ce lien, c’est là un thème auquel ont été consacrées maintes théories et évaluations empiriques concurrentes. Malheureusement, ces études n’ont pas permis d’aboutir à des conclusions convergentes sur le point de savoir s’il y a ou non relation inverse entre ces deux objectifs que sont une société équitable et une société riche.
  2. Cette situation apparaît moins surprenante lorsqu’on examine précisément les études réalisées. De nombreuses études empiriques considèrent la distribution finale ...

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/121403540472
File Format: text/html
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by OECD, Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs in its series OECD Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers with number 51.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 29 Jun 2001
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:oec:elsaaa:51-en

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 2 rue Andre Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16
Email:
Web page: http://www.oecd.org
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: ().

Related research
Keywords:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Schettkat, Ronald, 2003. "Institutions in the Economic Fitness Landscape: What Impact Do Welfare State Institutions Have on Economic Performance?," IZA Discussion Papers 696, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). [Downloadable!]
  2. Roman Arjona & Maxime Ladaique, 2003. "Mark Pearson Growth, Inequality and Social Protection," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 29(s1), pages 119-140, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Mark Pearson & John P. Martin, 2005. "Should We Extend the Role of Private Social Expenditure?," IZA Discussion Papers 1544, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  4. Astri Muren & Sten Nyberg, 2005. "Young Liberals and Old Conservatives - Inequality, Mobility and Redistribution," CESifo Working Paper Series CESifo Working Paper No. , CESifo Group Munich. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  5. Tiiu Paas & Marit Hinnosaar & Jaan Masso & Orsolya Szirko, 2004. "Social Protection Systems In The Baltic States," University of Tartu - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Working Paper Series 26, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu (Estonia). [Downloadable!]
  6. Timothy M. Smeeding, 2002. "Globalization, Inequality, and the Rich Countries of the G-20: Evidence from the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS)," Center for Policy Research Working Papers 48, Center for Policy Research, Maxwell School, Syracuse University. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? IDEAS is also providing many rankings, for example of authors and institutions.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-10.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.