This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Have Renewable Portfolio Standards Raised Electricity Rates? Evidence from U.S. Electric Utilities

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Constant Tra () (Department of Economics, University of Nevada, Las Vegas)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) have been a contentious issue amongst policymakers in recent years. Neoclassical theory would suggest that, in the short-run, RPS mandates will raise electricity rates if the cost of electricity generation via renewable energy technologies exceeds that of convention fossil fuel technologies. This study uses a quasi-experimental approach to investigate the effect of RPS policies on retail residential electricity rates. The study provides one of the first econometric investigations of the economic effect of RPS mandates. The empirical approach uses a panel dataset of 2,602 U.S. electric utilities from 1990 to 2006. The empirical findings provide several policy insights on the effect of RPS mandates. First, a state RPS mandate, on average, positively affects the average residential electricity rate. Second, no spillover effect exists for the RPS effect on electricity rates. In other words, utilities that operate in a RPS state, but are not subject to an RPS requirement, do not experience a significant increase in electric rates. Third, the RPS effect on residential electricity rates is significantly lower in states with a higher wind and solar energy potential. Finally, the magnitude of the RPS effect on residential electricity rates increases for utilities subject to higher requirements. The estimated elasticity of residential electricity rates with respect to an RPS requirement equals roughly 0.3.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.unlv.edu/projects/RePEc/pdf/0923.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function: First version, 2009
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Nevada, Las Vegas , Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number 0923.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 26 pages
Date of creation: Jun 2009
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:nlv:wpaper:0923

Contact details of provider:
Phone: (702) 895-3776
Fax: (702) 895-1354
Web page: http://business.unlv.edu/econ/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Bill Robinson).

Related research
Keywords: Renewable energy; Electricity; Renewable Portfolio Standards;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
Q42 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Alternative Energy Sources
Q48 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Government Policy
L98 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Government Policy

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Joskow, Paul L, 1997. "Restructuring, Competition and Regulatory Reform in the U.S. Electricity Sector," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 11(3), pages 119-38, Summer. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Fischer, Carolyn, 2006. "How Can Renewable Portfolio Standards Lower Electricity Prices?," Discussion Papers dp-06-20, Resources For the Future. [Downloadable!]
  3. Christopher R. Knittel, 2004. "Regulatory Restructuring and Incumbent Price Dynamics: The Case of U.S. Local Telephone Markets," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 86(2), pages 614-625, 04. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  4. Hausman, Jerry A, 1978. "Specification Tests in Econometrics," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(6), pages 1251-71, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  5. Rose, Kenneth, 2004. "The State of Retail Electricity Markets in the U.S," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 26-36. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  6. Greenstone, Michael & Gayer, Ted, 2009. "Quasi-experimental and experimental approaches to environmental economics," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 21-44, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  7. Michaels, Robert J., 2008. "A National Renewable Portfolio Standard: Politically Correct, Economically Suspect," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 9-28, April. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  8. Palmer, Karen & Burtraw, Dallas, 2005. "Cost-effectiveness of renewable electricity policies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 873-894, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  9. Thomas P. Lyon & John W. Mayo, 2005. "Regulatory Opportunism and Investment Behavior: Evidence from the U.S. Electric Utility Industry," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 36(3), pages 628-644, Autumn.
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? All bibliographic data on IDEAS has been put in the public domain by the publishers.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-14.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.