IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nex/wpaper/unifyingaccess.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Unifying Access

Author

Listed:
  • Hao Wu
  • David Levinson

    (TransportLab, School of Civil Engineering, University of Sydney)

Abstract

Since Hansen’s seminal 1959 paper, measures of access have evolved with technology and through practical applications. The myriad of distinct but familially related access measures created many more options to measure places, but has sown needless confusion. This paper systematically reviews measures of access across disciplines. We categorize measures of access, covering both mainstream and innovative but less widely-used techniques; each access measure (topological, contiguous, cumulative opportunities, utility, flow-based measures) is separated into Primal and Dual measure, based on whether accessibility is represented by the level of reachable opportunities or by the travel impedance. We show access measures are unified by the same intrinsic structure consisting of travel impedance and the opportunities reachable, and that access measured by different methods are equivalent under specific assumptions on travel impedance, and the accounting of relevant opportunities. This paper overviews the use of access measures from the existing literature, and clarifies measures of access, which should help users in the selection and appropriate use of access measures for the relevant context.

Suggested Citation

  • Hao Wu & David Levinson, 2020. "Unifying Access," Working Papers 2022-01, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    • Handle: RePEc:nex:wpaper:unifyingaccess
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102355
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/2123/22234
    File Function: First version, 2020
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102355?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei-Chien-Benny Chin & Tzai-Hung Wen, 2015. "Geographically Modified PageRank Algorithms: Identifying the Spatial Concentration of Human Movement in a Geospatial Network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Hao Wu & David Levinson & Somwrita Sarkar, 2019. "How transit scaling shapes cities," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 2(12), pages 1142-1148, December.
    3. Allen, W. Bruce & Liu, Dong & Singer, Scott, 1993. "Accesibility measures of U.S. metropolitan areas," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 439-449, December.
    4. Ahmed El-Geneidy & David Levinson, 2011. "Place Rank: Valuing Spatial Interactions," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 643-659, December.
    5. Qisheng Pan, 2013. "The impacts of an urban light rail system on residential property values: a case study of the Houston METRORail transit line," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 145-169, April.
    6. David Levinson, 1998. "Accessibility and the Journey to Work," Working Papers 199802, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    7. Cervero, Robert & Kang, Chang Deok, 2011. "Bus rapid transit impacts on land uses and land values in Seoul, Korea," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 102-116, January.
    8. Song, Ying & Miller, Harvey J. & Stempihar, Jeff & Zhou, Xuesong, 2017. "Green accessibility: Estimating the environmental costs of network-time prisms for sustainable transportation planning," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 109-119.
    9. Karen Mayor & Seán Lyons & David Duffy & Richard S. J. Tol, 2012. "A Hedonic Analysis of the Value of Rail Transport in the Greater Dublin Area," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 46(2), pages 239-261, May.
    10. Chi, Guangqing & Porter, Jeremy R. & Cosby, Arthur G. & Levinson, David, 2013. "The impact of gasoline price changes on traffic safety: a time geography explanation," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 1-11.
    11. Mizuki Kawabata & Qing Shen, 2007. "Commuting Inequality between Cars and Public Transit: The Case of the San Francisco Bay Area, 1990-2000," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(9), pages 1759-1780, August.
    12. Vega, Amaya, 2012. "Using Place Rank to measure sustainable accessibility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 411-418.
    13. Tong, Lu & Zhou, Xuesong & Miller, Harvey J., 2015. "Transportation network design for maximizing space–time accessibility," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 555-576.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cui, Boer & Boisjoly, Geneviève & El-Geneidy, Ahmed & Levinson, David, 2019. "Accessibility and the journey to work through the lens of equity," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 269-277.
    2. Jingming Liu & Xianhui Hou & Chuyu Xia & Xiang Kang & Yujun Zhou, 2021. "Examining the Spatial Coordination between Metrorail Accessibility and Urban Spatial Form in the Context of Big Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Zhong, Haotian & Li, Wei, 2016. "Rail transit investment and property values: An old tale retold," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 33-48.
    4. David Levinson & Hao Wu, 2020. "Towards a general theory of access," Working Papers 2022-01, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    5. AlQuhtani, Saad & Anjomani, Ardeshir, 2019. "Do rail transit stations affect housing value changes? The Dallas Fort-Worth metropolitan area case and implications," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Jian Liang & Kang Mo Koo & Chyi Lin Lee, 2021. "Transportation infrastructure improvement and real estate value: impact of level crossing removal project on housing prices," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 2969-3011, December.
    7. Salonen, Maria & Toivonen, Tuuli, 2013. "Modelling travel time in urban networks: comparable measures for private car and public transport," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 143-153.
    8. Mondschein, Andrew Samuel, 2013. "The Personal City: The Experiential, Cognitive Nature of Travel and Activity and Implications for Accessibility," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7014d9cg, University of California Transportation Center.
    9. Alexander Hellervik & Leonard Nilsson & Claes Andersson, 2019. "Preferential centrality – A new measure unifying urban activity, attraction and accessibility," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(7), pages 1331-1346, September.
    10. Merlin, Louis A. & Hu, Lingqian, 2017. "Does competition matter in measures of job accessibility? Explaining employment in Los Angeles," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 77-88.
    11. Wei He & Ruqing Zhao & Shu Gao, 2024. "Exploring the Impact of Multimodal Access on Property and Land Economies in Shanghai’s Inner Ring Districts: Leveraging Advanced Spatial Analysis Techniques," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, February.
    12. Tideman, Nicolaus & Plassmann, Florenz, 2018. "The effects of changes in land value on the value of buildings," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 69-76.
    13. Kelobonye, Keone & Zhou, Heng & McCarney, Gary & Xia, Jianhong (Cecilia), 2020. "Measuring the accessibility and spatial equity of urban services under competition using the cumulative opportunities measure," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    14. Allen, Jeff & Farber, Steven, 2019. "A measure of competitive access to destinations for comparing across multiple study regions," SocArXiv 8yf7q, Center for Open Science.
    15. Lingqian Hu, 2017. "Job accessibility and employment outcomes: which income groups benefit the most?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 1421-1443, November.
    16. Ďurček Pavol & Nováková Gabriela & Horňák Marcel & Kusendová Dagmar, 2020. "How will new orbital motorways reshape accessibility in Bratislava metropolitan area?," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 50(50), pages 83-100, December.
    17. Mondschein, Andrew Samuel, 2012. "The Personal City: The Experimental, Cognitive Nature of Travel and Activity and Implications for Accessibility," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt67d5w48s, University of California Transportation Center.
    18. Josiane Palma Lima & Juliana da Camara Abitante & Nívea Adriana Dias Pons & Clara Moreira Senne, 2019. "A Spatial Fuzzy Multicriteria Analysis of Accessibility: A Case Study in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, June.
    19. José M. Casado-Díaz & Raquel Simón-Albert & Hipólito Simón, 2022. "Reassessing the commuting penalty for immigrants: new evidence from Spain," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 1099-1132, August.
    20. Xu, Wangtu (Ato) & Li, Yongling & Wang, Hui, 2016. "Transit accessibility for commuters considering the demand elasticities of distance and transfer," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 138-156.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Accessibility; Access; Transport; Land Use; Unification; Theory;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R41 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Transportation: Demand, Supply, and Congestion; Travel Time; Safety and Accidents; Transportation Noise
    • R14 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Land Use Patterns

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nex:wpaper:unifyingaccess. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: David Levinson (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nexmnus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.