Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Intra-national Trade Costs: Measurement and Aggregation

Contents:

Author Info

  • Delina E. Agnosteva
  • James E. Anderson
  • Yoto V. Yotov

Abstract

We develop and apply a procedure to flexibly estimate intra-national border barriers and intra-regional trade costs. Bilateral border barriers very significantly depress Canadian inter-provincial trade for some pairs, though the overall effect is rather small. Bilateral distance imposes much larger inter-provincial trade costs. Contiguity between provinces accounts for little. Intra-regional trade cost variation affects relative bilateral costs and trade flows, and alters comparative statics except in a neutral case rejected by the data. Consistent trade cost aggregation procedures are developed and applied for groups of regions and/or sectors.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w19872.pdf
Download Restriction: Access to the full text is generally limited to series subscribers, however if the top level domain of the client browser is in a developing country or transition economy free access is provided. More information about subscriptions and free access is available at http://www.nber.org/wwphelp.html. Free access is also available to older working papers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc in its series NBER Working Papers with number 19872.

as in new window
Length:
Date of creation: Jan 2014
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:19872

Note: ITI
Contact details of provider:
Postal: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.
Phone: 617-868-3900
Email:
Web page: http://www.nber.org
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Francisco Requena & Carlos Llano, 2010. "The border effects in Spain: an industry-level analysis," Empirica, Springer, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 455-476, November.
  2. James E. Anderson & Eric van Wincoop, 2003. "Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 93(1), pages 170-192, March.
  3. Sandra PONCET, 2002. "A Fragmented China. Measure and Determinants of Chinese Domestic Market Disintegration," Working Papers, CERDI 200221, CERDI.
  4. Joao Santos Silva & Silvana Tenreyro, 2009. "Further simulation evidence on the performance of the Poisson pseudo-maximum likelihood estimator," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library 25506, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  5. Cletus C. Coughlin & Dennis Novy, 2009. "Is the international border effect larger than the domestic border effect? evidence from U.S. trade," Working Papers, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 2009-057, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
  6. Alwyn Young, 2000. "The Razor'S Edge: Distortions And Incremental Reform In The People'S Republic Of China," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, MIT Press, vol. 115(4), pages 1091-1135, November.
  7. Daniel J. Henderson & Daniel L. Millimet, 2008. "Is gravity linear?," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(2), pages 137-172.
  8. Keith Head & Thierry Mayer, 2013. "What Separates Us? Sources of Resistance to Globalization," Working Papers, CEPII research center 2013-26, CEPII research center.
  9. James E. Anderson & Mykyta Vesselovsky & Yoto V. Yotov, 2013. "Gravity, Scale and Exchange Rates," NBER Working Papers, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc 18807, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  10. McCallum, John, 1995. "National Borders Matter: Canada-U.S. Regional Trade Patterns," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 85(3), pages 615-23, June.
  11. Holger C. Wolf, 2000. "Intranational Home Bias In Trade," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, MIT Press, vol. 82(4), pages 555-563, November.
  12. Laura Hering & Sandra Poncet, 2010. "Market access and individual wages: evidence from China," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers), HAL hal-00633785, HAL.
  13. Chen, Natalie, 2004. "Intra-national versus international trade in the European Union: why do national borders matter?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 93-118, May.
  14. Fally, Thibault & Paillacar, Rodrigo & Terra, Cristina, 2010. "Economic geography and wages in Brazil: Evidence from micro-data," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 155-168, January.
  15. Volker Nitsch, 2000. "National borders and international trade: evidence from the European Union," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 33(4), pages 1091-1105, November.
  16. Nitsch, Volker & Wolf, Nikolaus, 2009. "Tear Down this Wall : On the Persistence of Borders in Trade," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS), University of Warwick, Department of Economics 919, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
  17. Michael Anderson & Stephen Smith, 1999. "Canadian Provinces in World Trade: Engagement and Detachment," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 32(1), pages 22-38, February.
  18. Russell Hillberry & David Hummels, 2003. "Intranational Home Bias: Some Explanations," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, MIT Press, vol. 85(4), pages 1089-1092, November.
  19. I-Hui Cheng & Howard J. Wall, 2005. "Controlling for heterogeneity in gravity models of trade and integration," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, issue Jan, pages 49-63.
  20. Jennifer Winter & Trevor Tombe, 2012. "Internal Trade and Aggregate Productivity," 2012 Meeting Papers, Society for Economic Dynamics 314, Society for Economic Dynamics.
  21. James E. Anderson & J. Peter Neary, 2005. "Measuring the Restrictiveness of International Trade Policy," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262012200, December.
  22. Poncet, Sandra, 2003. "Measuring Chinese domestic and international integration," China Economic Review, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 1-21.
  23. Keith Head & Thierry Mayer, 2004. "Non-Europe : the magnitude and causes of market fragmentation in the EU," Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1) bla99004a, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).
  24. Kathleen E. Macmillan & Patrick Grady, 2007. "A New Prescription: Can the BC-Alberta TILMA Resuscitate Internal Trade in Canada?," C.D. Howe Institute Backgrounder, C.D. Howe Institute, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 106, October.
  25. Baier, Scott L. & Bergstrand, Jeffrey H., 2007. "Do free trade agreements actually increase members' international trade?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 72-95, March.
  26. Anderson, James & Milot, Catherine & Yotov, Yoto, 2012. "How Much Does Geography Deflect Services Trade?," School of Economics Working Paper Series, LeBow College of Business, Drexel University 2012-5, LeBow College of Business, Drexel University.
  27. James E. Anderson & Yoto V. Yotov, 2008. "The Changing Incidence of Geography," NBER Working Papers, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc 14423, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  28. Shang-Jin Wei, 1996. "Intra-National versus International Trade: How Stubborn are Nations in Global Integration?," NBER Working Papers, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc 5531, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  29. Novy, Dennis, 2008. "Gravity Redux : Measuring International Trade Costs with Panel Data," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS), University of Warwick, Department of Economics 861, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
  30. Yilmazkuday, Hakan, 2012. "Understanding interstate trade patterns," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 158-166.
  31. Lameli, Alfred & Nitsch, Volker & Suedekum, Jens & Wolf, Nikolaus, 2013. "Same Same But Different: Dialects and Trade," IZA Discussion Papers, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) 7397, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
  32. Daniel L. Millimet & Thomas Osang, 2007. "Do state borders matter for U.S. intranational trade? The role of history and internal migration," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 40(1), pages 93-126, February.
  33. Combes, Pierre-Philippe & Lafourcade, Miren & Mayer, Thierry, 2005. "The trade-creating effects of business and social networks: evidence from France," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 1-29, May.
  34. Alwyn Young, 2000. "The Razor's Edge: Distortions and Incremental Reform in the People's Republic of China," NBER Working Papers, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc 7828, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  35. Grady, Patrick & Macmillan, Kathleen, 2007. "Interprovincial Barriers to Labour Mobility in Canada:Policy, Knowledge Gaps and Research Issues," MPRA Paper, University Library of Munich, Germany 2988, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  36. repec:clg:wpaper:2013-07 is not listed on IDEAS
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Markus Eberhardt & Zheng Wang & Zhihong Yu, 2014. "From One to Many Central Plans: Drug Advertising Inspections and Intra-National Protectionism in China," CESifo Working Paper Series, CESifo Group Munich 4682, CESifo Group Munich.

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:19872. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ().

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.