Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

The 1981-82 Velocity Decline: A Structural Shift in Income or Money Demand?

Contents:

Author Info

  • Robert J. Gordon

Abstract

The velocity of both M1 and M2 appears to have experienced a sharp and persistent downward shift during 1981 and 1982. The implications of this shift are reexamined within the context of the previous literature on quarterly econometric equations explaining the demand for money. The traditional specification of money demand equations popularized by Chow and Goldfeld relates real balances to output, interest rates,and lagged real balances, all expressed as log levels. A consistent finding has been a large coefficient on the lagged dependent variable.While this has been interpreted as indicating substantial adjustment costs in portfolio behavior, it is also consistent with lags or"inertia" in price adjustment due to the presence of long-term wage and price contracts. The fact that the traditional Chow-Goldfeld money demand specification encountered large post-sample prediction errors at the time of the first oil shock in 1973-75 may suggest that a new interpretation of adjustment costs is required. It may be costly to adjust nominal balances by shifting to alternative assets, but it is costless for agents to allow real balances to shrink in response to an unanticipated price shock, as in 1973-75. A substantial amount of evidence is provided on the relationship between money, income, and interest rates, using alternative dynamic specifications. The post-1973 prediction error in a demand equation for M1 is reduced by three-quarters when the equation is specified in nominal first-difference form rather than in the form of real levels in logs. Results indicate much smaller post-1979 prediction errors for equations describing "simple-sum" M2 than for simple-sum M1, Divisia M1,or for Divisia M2 measures of the money supply.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w1343.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc in its series NBER Working Papers with number 1343.

as in new window
Length:
Date of creation: May 1984
Date of revision:
Publication status: published as in "The Proceedings of the Conference on Monetary Targeting and Velocity," Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, 1984, pp. 67-99.
Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:1343

Note: EFG
Contact details of provider:
Postal: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.
Phone: 617-868-3900
Email:
Web page: http://www.nber.org
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Laidler, David, 1980. "The demand for money in the United States-- Yet again," Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 219-271, January.
  2. Stephen M. Goldfeld, 1973. "The Demand for Money Revisited," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 4(3), pages 577-646.
  3. Robert J. Gordon, 1983. "Using Monetary Control to Dampen the Business Cycle: A New Set of First Principles," NBER Working Papers 1210, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  4. Fama, Eugene F, 1975. "Short-Term Interest Rates as Predictors of Inflation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 65(3), pages 269-82, June.
  5. Granger, C. W. J. & Newbold, P., 1974. "Spurious regressions in econometrics," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 2(2), pages 111-120, July.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Chen, Yi-Ting, 2006. "Non-nested tests for competing U.S. narrow money demand functions," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 339-363, March.
  2. Subramanian S. Sriram, 1999. "Survey of Literatureon Demand for Money," IMF Working Papers 99/64, International Monetary Fund.
  3. V. Vance Roley, 1985. "Money Demand Predictability," NBER Working Papers 1580, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  4. Werner, Richard A., 2012. "Towards a new research programme on ‘banking and the economy’ — Implications of the Quantity Theory of Credit for the prevention and resolution of banking and debt crises," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 1-17.

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:1343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ().

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.