Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Combining farm simulation with frontier efficiency analysis

Contents:

Author Info

  • David Berre

    ()
    (IESEG School of Management (LEM-CNRS) and University of Lille, CIRAD, UMR SELMET, Lille)

  • Jonathan Vayssières

    (CIRAD, UMR SELMET, Dakar, Sénégal)

  • Jean-Philippe Boussemart

    (University of Lille 3 and IESEG School of Management (LEM-CNRS))

  • Hervé Leleu

    (CNRS-LEM and IESEG School of Management)

  • Emmanuel Tillard

    (CIRAD, UMR SELMET, Saint-Pierre, La Réunion, France)

Abstract

The model used, GAMEDE, is a “whole-farm” dynamic model composed of 6 biophysical modules and a management system (Vayssières et al, 2009). This simulation model gives accurate predictions for various sustainability indicators (labor, energy consumption, production, nitrogen leaks to the environment…) to characterize observed or hypothetical farms. As GAMEDE is based on a stock-flow approach, we can monitor the farm stocks (slurry, fodders…) over time. GAMEDE also gives a full description of management operations of the production system. The GAMEDE model is randomly parameterized with the objective to cover the realm of the possible production systems by simulation. Key issues of the methodology are selecting input parameters and defining lower and upper bounds to these parameters. Expert knowledge is very useful to define these bounds. Even though the simulation approach constitutes a relevant tool for describing the production system, it can not provide a full efficiency analysis taking into account multiple input parameters. We suggest combining GAMEDE with “Data Envelopment Analysis” (DEA) to assess the efficiency of a large variety of simulated farms (frontier efficiency analysis). Each farm is characterized by different structural and management inputs parameters, inflows and sustainability indicators (including outflows). The last two types of variables are respectively inputs and outputs used in the DEA model. For inefficient farms, potential efficiency progress is calculated as the distance between these farms and the frontier. The main advantage of our methodology is to benefit of the synergy between simulation and efficiency frontier modelling, as drawback of each method are balanced by the asset of the other method.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://my.ieseg.fr/bienvenue/DownloadDoc.asp?Fich=22346569_2012-ECO-16_Berre_et_al.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by IESEG School of Management in its series Working Papers with number 2012-ECO-16.

as in new window
Length: 11 pages
Date of creation: Dec 2012
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ies:wpaper:e201216

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 3, rue de la Digue, FR-59000 Lille
Phone: +33/320545892
Fax: +33/320574855
Web page: http://www.ieseg.fr/
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: Simulation model; Optimization model; Data Envelopment Analysis; efficiency; dairy farming systems;

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Isabelle Piot-Lepetit & Dominique Vermersch, 1998. "Pricing Organic Nitrogen Under The Weak Disposability Assumption: An Application to the French Pig Sector," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 85-99.
  2. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
  3. Nevens, F. & Verbruggen, I. & Reheul, D. & Hofman, G., 2006. "Farm gate nitrogen surpluses and nitrogen use efficiency of specialized dairy farms in Flanders: Evolution and future goals," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 88(2-3), pages 142-155, June.
  4. Vayssières, Jonathan & Guerrin, François & Paillat, Jean-Marie & Lecomte, Philippe, 2009. "GAMEDE: A global activity model for evaluating the sustainability of dairy enterprises Part I - Whole-farm dynamic model," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 101(3), pages 128-138, July.
  5. De Jager, A. & Onduru, D. & van Wijk, M. S. & Vlaming, J. & Gachini, G. N., 2001. "Assessing sustainability of low-external-input farm management systems with the nutrient monitoring approach: a case study in Kenya," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 69(1-2), pages 99-118.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ies:wpaper:e201216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Monika Marin).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.