Logic and some empirical findings suggest that the consequences of the level of executive ownership and the size of stock option grants have non-monotic relations to firm performance. The size of option grants now typical in the U.S. is likely to encourage an excessive level of risk taking. Stock options are not an effective means of increasing executive ownership and are generally less efficient than full-value grants when comparing opportunity cost to the company and initial psychological value to the executive. Implications for research and compensation design are noted.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Industrial Relations Center, University of Minnesota (Twin Cities Campus) in its series Working Papers with number
0803.
Length: Date of creation: Date of revision: Handle: RePEc:hrr:papers:0803
Contact details of provider: Postal: 3-300 Carlson School of Management, 321 19th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55455-0438 Phone: (612) 624-2500 Fax: (612) 624-8360 Email: Web page: http://www.irc.csom.umn.edu/ More information through EDIRC
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Mary Walker).
Related research
Keywords:
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: