IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-01244223.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Variétés des formes d’accompagnement du créateur d’entreprise : quand la dimension interpersonnelle devient prégnante

Author

Listed:
  • Sylvie Sammut

    (ERFI - Equipe de Recherche sur la Firme et l'Industrie - UM - Université de Montpellier)

Abstract

Variété des formes d'accompagnement du créateur d'entreprise : quand la dimension interpersonnelle devient prégnante 1. Les fondements de la réflexion Selon Paturel et Masmoudi (2005), 70 à 85 % des nouvelles entreprises survivent grâce à un accompagnement alors que celles qui choisissent de se développer sans encadrement connaissent un taux de survie de 50%. Ces propos corroborent ceux de Viennet, qui martelait déjà l'opinion il y a près de vingt ans en affirmant que l'accompagnement fait la différence entre le succès et l'échec de l'entreprise : « le coefficient de survie à quatre ans des entreprises qui prennent la précaution de s'entourer de conseils de spécialistes dépasse de 12 à 17 points celui des entreprises qui dédaignent ces avis » (Viennet, 1990). Les rares enquêtes ou travaux réalisés sur l'accompagnement vont tous dans le même sens d'une corrélation positive entre accompagnement et pérennité (Sammut, 1995 ; Hernandez, 1999 ; Chabaud et alii, 2003). Le rapport Hurel (2002) fait état de 6 réseaux d'accompagnement « officiels », représentant quelques 700 implantations locales : le réseau des CCI (Entreprendre en France), celui des chambres des métiers, France active, le réseau des boutiques de gestion, France Initiative Réseau, l'ADIE 1 … Ces réseaux ont le mérite d'exister mais la question est de savoir si les créateurs les considèrent comme un élément incontournable de l'accompagnement tel qu'ils le souhaiteraient. Si l'on définit simplement l'accompagnement comme le processus qui permet à une personne et/ou une entreprise de mieux comprendre et d'appréhender avec plus

Suggested Citation

  • Sylvie Sammut, 2008. "Variétés des formes d’accompagnement du créateur d’entreprise : quand la dimension interpersonnelle devient prégnante," Post-Print halshs-01244223, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01244223
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01244223
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01244223/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cécile Fonrouge, 2007. "Relations externes et innovation. Le cas du secteur des biotechnologies," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 170(1), pages 117-133.
    2. Gautam Ahuja, 2000. "The duality of collaboration: inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 317-343, March.
    3. Cécile Fonrouge, 2007. "Relations externes et innovation," Post-Print halshs-00691918, HAL.
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/12149 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Pierre Romelaer, 1999. "Relations externes de l'entreprise et gestion des innovations," Post-Print hal-00160041, HAL.
    6. Estelle Pellegrin-Boucher & Gaël Gueguen, 2005. "Stratégies de «coopétition» au sein d'un écosystème d'affaires:une illustration à travers le cas de SAP," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 8(1), pages 109-130, March.
    7. Andrea Larson & Jennifer A. Starr, 1993. "A Network Model of Organization Formation," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 17(2), pages 5-15, January.
    8. Barney, Jay B. & Busenitz, Lowell W. & Fiet, James O. & Moesel, Douglas D., 1996. "New venture teams' assessment of learning assistance from venture capital firms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 257-272, July.
    9. Cécile Fonrouge & Cécile Ayerbe, 2005. "Les transitions entre innovations : études de cas et proposition d'une grille d'interprétation," Post-Print halshs-00696111, HAL.
    10. Chrisman, James J. & McMullan, Ed & Hall, Jeremy, 2005. "The influence of guided preparation on the long-term performance of new ventures," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 769-791, November.
    11. Ozgen, Eren & Baron, Robert A., 2007. "Social sources of information in opportunity recognition: Effects of mentors, industry networks, and professional forums," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 174-192, March.
    12. Vincent Mangematin, 2003. "PME de biotechnologie: Plusieurs Business models en concurrence," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-00422702, HAL.
    13. Cohen, Wesley M & Levinthal, Daniel A, 1989. "Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 99(397), pages 569-596, September.
    14. Vincent Mangematin, 2003. "PME de biotechnologie: Plusieurs Business models en concurrence," Post-Print hal-00422702, HAL.
    15. Frank T. Rothaermel & David L. Deeds, 2004. "Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: a system of new product development," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 201-221, March.
    16. Ranjay Gulati, 1999. "Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(5), pages 397-420, May.
    17. James G. March, 1991. "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 71-87, February.
    18. Daniel Kahneman & Dan Lovallo, 1993. "Timid Choices and Bold Forecasts: A Cognitive Perspective on Risk Taking," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(1), pages 17-31, January.
    19. Didier Chabaud & Sylvie Ehlinger & Véronique Perret, 2003. "Les incubateurs d'entreprises innovantes : un réseau entrepreneurial reconfiguré ?," Post-Print halshs-00536290, HAL.
    20. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3179 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Cécile Ayerbe & Cécile Fonrouge, 2005. "Les transitions entre innovations : études de cas et proposition d'une grille d'interprétation," Post-Print halshs-00267260, HAL.
    22. Cécile Ayerbe & Cécile Fonrouge, 2005. "Les transitions entre innovations:études de cas et proposition d’une grille d’interprétation," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 8(2), pages 39-64, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cécile Fonrouge, 2007. "Le maintien du potentiel entrepreneurial : l'apport des relations externes dans le secteur des biotechnologies," Post-Print halshs-00696110, HAL.
    2. Cécile Fonrouge, 2007. "Relations externes et innovation," Post-Print halshs-00691918, HAL.
    3. Cécile Fonrouge, 2008. "Entrepreneuriat et innovations organisationnelles : pratiques et principes," Post-Print halshs-00687305, HAL.
    4. Vanhaverbeke, W.P.M. & Beerkens, B.E. & Duysters, G.M., 2003. "Explorative and exploitative learning strategies in technology-based alliance networks," Working Papers 03.22, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies.
    5. Li, Zhengyu, 2016. "Essays on knowledge sourcing and technological capability : A knowledge structure perspective," Other publications TiSEM b8ff31fc-c57b-4bc3-b5a4-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. Wim Vanhaverbeke & Victor Gilsing & Bonnie Beerkens & Geert Duysters, 2009. "The Role of Alliance Network Redundancy in the Creation of Core and Non‐core Technologies," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(2), pages 215-244, March.
    7. Colombo, Massimo G. & Grilli, Luca & Piva, Evila, 2006. "In search of complementary assets: The determinants of alliance formation of high-tech start-ups," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 1166-1199, October.
    8. Mouri, Nacef & Sarkar, M.B. & Frye, Melissa, 2012. "Alliance portfolios and shareholder value in post-IPO firms: The moderating roles of portfolio structure and firm-level uncertainty," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 355-371.
    9. Agata Sudolska & Justyna Łapińska, 2020. "Exploring Determinants of Innovation Capability in Manufacturing Companies Operating in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-21, August.
    10. Partanen, Jukka & Kohtamäki, Marko & Patel, Pankaj C. & Parida, Vinit, 2020. "Supply chain ambidexterity and manufacturing SME performance: The moderating roles of network capability and strategic information flow," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    11. Manuel Guisado-González & Jennifer González-Blanco & José Luis Coca-Pérez, 2019. "Exploration, exploitation, and firm age in alliance portfolios," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 9(4), pages 387-406, December.
    12. Choo Yeon Kim & Myung Sub Lim & Jae Wook Yoo, 2019. "Ambidexterity in External Knowledge Search Strategies and Innovation Performance: Mediating Role of Balanced Innovation and Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-23, September.
    13. Frank T. Rothaermel & Maria Tereza Alexandre, 2009. "Ambidexterity in Technology Sourcing: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 759-780, August.
    14. Burcharth, Ana Luiza Lara de Araújo & Lettl, Christopher & Ulhøi, John Parm, 2015. "Extending organizational antecedents of absorptive capacity: Organizational characteristics that encourage experimentation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 90(PA), pages 269-284.
    15. Gupeng Zhang & Xiao Wang & Hongbo Duan, 2020. "Obscure but important: examining the indirect effects of alliance networks in exploratory and exploitative innovation paradigms," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(3), pages 1745-1764, September.
    16. repec:dau:papers:123456789/8127 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Devarakonda, Ramakrishna & Reuer, Jeffrey J. & Tadikonda, Harsha, 2022. "Founder social capital and value appropriation in R&D alliance agreements," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(4).
    18. Haiying Lin, 2012. "Cross-sector Alliances for Corporate Social Responsibility Partner Heterogeneity Moderates Environmental Strategy Outcomes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 110(2), pages 219-229, October.
    19. Fabio Sorrentino & Francesco Garraffo, 2012. "Explaining performing R&D through alliances: Implications for the business model of Italian dedicated biotech firms," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 16(3), pages 449-475, August.
    20. Gilsing, Victor & Nooteboom, Bart & Vanhaverbeke, Wim & Duysters, Geert & van den Oord, Ad, 2008. "Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies: Technological distance, betweenness centrality and density," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 1717-1731, December.
    21. Russo, Angeloantonio & Vurro, Clodia & Nag, Rajiv, 2019. "To have or to be? The interplay between knowledge structure and market identity in knowledge-based alliance formation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 571-583.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01244223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.