IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00581145.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

L'intérêt du Balanced Scorecard dans l'évolution des modes de contrôle des Départements français

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Noël Chauvey

    (ERFI - Equipe de Recherche sur la Firme et l'Industrie - UM - Université de Montpellier)

Abstract

Les bases de la légitimité de l'action publique ont profondément changé. Ces changements se sont en particulier traduits par une évolution des fondements du contrôle de gestion public et par le développement d'une exigence d'évaluation des politiques publiques. Les modalités de mise en oeuvre de ces nouveaux modes de contrôle et les méthodes sur lesquelles ils peuvent s'appuyer restent toutefois à définir. Cette communication a pour objet de discuter la capacité du Balanced Scorecard à faciliter l'évolution du contrôle public dans une voie plus stratégique, notamment tendue vers l'évaluation des politiques publiques. Elle s'appuie sur une analyse théorique, puis sur la revue des études empiriques existantes, et enfin sur une enquête exploratoire. Elle montre que, si l'intérêt du Balanced Scorecard dans ce contexte semble avéré, il reste peu connu et très peu souvent mis en oeuvre dans les collectivités françaises, la maturité du contrôle traditionnel et l'état des systèmes d'information ne permettant pas toujours une mise en oeuvre immédiate de ce type d'approche.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Noël Chauvey, 2005. "L'intérêt du Balanced Scorecard dans l'évolution des modes de contrôle des Départements français," Post-Print halshs-00581145, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00581145
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00581145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00581145/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Huron & Jacques Spindler, 1998. "Le management public local," Post-Print hal-00493544, HAL.
    2. Mueller,Dennis C. (ed.), 1997. "Perspectives on Public Choice," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521553773.
    3. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3349 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Romain Laufer & Alain Burlaud, 1980. "Management public," Post-Print halshs-00490675, HAL.
    5. Pascal Fabre, 2004. "L'évaluation de la performance des associations dans les villes françaises, entre proximité et contingence," Post-Print halshs-00593090, HAL.
    6. David Huron, 1998. "Le management public local au regard de la spécificité territoriale française," Post-Print hal-00493551, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Carassus & Damien Gardey & Christophe Maurel, 2011. "Les démarches locales de performance publique face à la LOLF : mimétisme ou innovation ?," Post-Print hal-02431106, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Damien Bo & Philippe Luu, 2011. "Audit public, audit privé," Post-Print hal-00646767, HAL.
    2. Persson, Torsten & Tabellini, Guido, 2002. "Political economics and public finance," Handbook of Public Economics, in: A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (ed.), Handbook of Public Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 24, pages 1549-1659, Elsevier.
    3. Thomas A. Garrett & Russell S. Sobel, 2004. "State Lottery Revenue: The Importance of Game Characteristics," Public Finance Review, , vol. 32(3), pages 313-330, May.
    4. Giovanni Trovato & Marco Alfó, 2006. "Credit rationing and the financial structure of Italian small and medium enterprises," Journal of Applied Economics, Universidad del CEMA, vol. 9, pages 167-184, May.
    5. Gabriella Montinola & Ramon Moreno, 2001. "The political economy of foreign bank entry and its impact: theory and a case study," Pacific Basin Working Paper Series 2001-11, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
    6. Matthias Dahm & Nicolás Porteiro, 2008. "Informational lobbying under the shadow of political pressure," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 30(4), pages 531-559, May.
    7. Aleksandras KRYLOVAS & Natalja KOSAREVA & Edmundas Kazimieras ZAVADSKAS, 2016. "Statistical Analysis of KEMIRA Type Weights Balancing Methods," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(3), pages 19-39, September.
    8. Pablo T. Spiller, 2003. "The Institutional Foundations of Public Policy: A Transactions Approach with Application to Argentina," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 281-306, October.
    9. Ghulam Shabbir & Mumtaz Anwar & Shahid Adil, 2016. "Corruption, Political Stability and Economic Growth," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 55(4), pages 689-702.
    10. Bruno S. Frey & Stephan Meier, "undated". "Pro-Social Behavior, Reciprocity or Both?," IEW - Working Papers 107, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
    11. Stephen Coate & Michael Conlin, 2002. "Voter Turnout: Theory and Evidence from Texas Liquor Referenda," NBER Working Papers 8720, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Kadeřábková Jaroslava & Jetmar Marek, 2010. "Selected issues of the development of small municipalities in the Czech Republic, financing of municipalities," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 2(2), pages 102-117, January.
    13. Martimort, David & Semenov, Aggey, 2008. "The informational effects of competition and collusion in legislative politics," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(7), pages 1541-1563, July.
    14. Manfred Holler & Peter Skott, 2005. "Election campaigns, agenda setting and electoral outcomes," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 125(1), pages 215-228, July.
    15. Kokovin Sergey & Zhelobodko Evgeniy, 2004. "Leviathanian Fiscal Competition in Heterogeneous Country," EERC Working Paper Series 01-219e, EERC Research Network, Russia and CIS.
    16. Kirchgassner, Gebhard, 2000. "Probabilistic Voting and Equilibrium: An Impossibility Result," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 103(1-2), pages 35-48, April.
    17. D.P. Doessel & Abbas Valadkhani, 2002. "Public Finance and The Size of Government: A Literature Review and Econometric Results for Fiji," School of Economics and Finance Discussion Papers and Working Papers Series 108, School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology.
    18. Andrew Pickering & James Rockey, 2011. "Ideology and the Growth of Government," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 93(3), pages 907-919, August.
    19. William F. Shughart II, 1999. "The Reformer’s Dilemma," Public Finance Review, , vol. 27(5), pages 561-565, September.
    20. Alois Stutzer & Lorenz Goette & Michael Zehnder, 2011. "Active Decisions and Prosocial Behaviour: a Field Experiment on Blood Donation," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 121(556), pages 476-493, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00581145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.