IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02840974.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Taking into account the processed products in the evaluation of agricultural policies : an analysis framework
[Prise en compte des produits agricoles transformés dans l'évaluation des politiques agricoles : un cadre d'analyse]

Author

Listed:
  • Marion Desquilbet

    (ESR - Unité de recherche d'Économie et Sociologie Rurales - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique)

  • Herve Guyomard

    (ESR - Unité de recherche d'Économie et Sociologie Rurales - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique)

  • Chantal Le Mouël

    (ESR - Unité de recherche d'Économie et Sociologie Rurales - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique)

  • . Secteur Sesames. Sciences Economiques Et Sociales Pour L'Agriculture Et L'Agro-Alimentaire Et Méthodes d'Etude Des Systèmesparis

    (INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique)

  • . Esr. Département d'Economie Et Sociologie Ruralesdijon

    (INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique)

Abstract

La plupart des produits agricoles passent par un, voire plusieurs stades de transformation avant la consommation finale. Les marchés des produits agricoles transformés sont cependant rarement intégrés explicitement dans les études sectorielles d'évaluation des politiques agricoles, alors que leur existence n'est pas neutre au regard des résultats des interventions menées. Cette étude propose un cadre d'analyse permettant de mettre en évidence les effets dus à ces marchés de produits transformés, à partir de deux modèles d'équilibre général, l'un ou le produit agricole est considéré comme un bien de consommation finale, l'autre où il est considéré comme un bien intermédiaire entièrement utilisé par un secteur de transformation alimentaire. On compare alors, dans les deux modèles, l'efficacité relative de trois instruments (transfert découplé, aide directe couplée et prix garanti) pour un objectif donné de transfert de revenu vers les agriculteurs.

Suggested Citation

  • Marion Desquilbet & Herve Guyomard & Chantal Le Mouël & . Secteur Sesames. Sciences Economiques Et Sociales Pour L'Agriculture Et L'Agro-Alimentaire Et Méthodes d'Etude Des Systèmesparis & . Esr. Dépa, 1996. "Taking into account the processed products in the evaluation of agricultural policies : an analysis framework [Prise en compte des produits agricoles transformés dans l'évaluation des politiques ag," Post-Print hal-02840974, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02840974
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02840974
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02840974/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Feenstra, Robert C., 1986. "Trade policy with several goods and market linkages," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(3-4), pages 249-267, May.
    2. Philip L. Paarlberg, 1995. "Agricultural Export Subsidies and Intermediate Goods Trade," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 77(1), pages 119-128.
    3. Bruce Gardner, 1983. "Efficient Redistribution through Commodity Markets," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 65(2), pages 225-234.
    4. Jagdish Bhagwati, 1989. "Protectionism," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262521504, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aldanondo, Ana Maria & Puertolas, Javier, 2002. "International Quota Transfer and Intermediate Goods," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24851, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Fuller, Frank Harland, 1996. "The location of marginal production for value-added and intermediate goods: optimal policies and trade volumes," ISU General Staff Papers 1996010108000012147, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    3. Harvey, David R., 2003. "Policy Dependency And Reform: Economic Gains Versus Political Pains," 2003 Annual Meeting, August 16-22, 2003, Durban, South Africa 25865, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Jerzy Michalek & Pavel Ciaian & d’Artis Kancs, 2014. "Capitalization of the Single Payment Scheme into Land Value: Generalized Propensity Score Evidence from the European Union," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 90(2), pages 260-289.
    5. Kilmer, Richard L. & Armbruster, Walter J., 1984. "Methods For Evaluating Economic Efficiency In Agricultural Marketing," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 16(1), pages 1-9, July.
    6. Harvey, David R., 2004. "Policy dependency and reform: economic gains versus political pains," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 31(2-3), pages 265-275, December.
    7. Bullock, D. S. & Salhofer, K., 1998. "Measuring the social costs of suboptimal combinations of policy instruments: A general framework and an example," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 18(3), pages 249-259, May.
    8. Swinnen, Johan F. M. & Banerjee, Anurag N. & Gorter, Harry de, 2001. "Economic development, institutional change, and the political economy of agricultural protection: An econometric study of Belgium since the 19th century," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 25-43, October.
    9. Jeff Alwang & Jaime Ortiz & George Norton, 1995. "Interacciones entre Políticas de Precios y Gastos en Investigación Agropecuaria," Latin American Journal of Economics-formerly Cuadernos de Economía, Instituto de Economía. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile., vol. 32(96), pages 199-216.
    10. Just, Richard E. & Rausser, Gordon C., 1984. "Uncertain economic environments and conditional policies," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt0q33x98s, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    11. Lusk, Jayson L., 2012. "The political ideology of food," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 530-542.
    12. Mehrdad Vahabi, 2011. "Appropriation, violent enforcement, and transaction costs: a critical survey," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 227-253, April.
    13. Pavel Ciaian & D'Artis Kancs & Johan Swinnen, 2014. "The Impact of the 2013 Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy on Land Capitalization in the European Union," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 36(4), pages 643-673.
    14. Alston, Julian M. & Smith, Vincent H. & Acquaye, Albert & Hosseini, Safdar, 1999. "Least-cost cheap-food policies: some implications of international food aid," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 20(3), pages 191-201, May.
    15. Pavel Ciaian & d'Artis Kancs & Maria Espinosa, 2018. "The Impact of the 2013 CAP Reform on the Decoupled Payments’ Capitalisation into Land Values," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(2), pages 306-337, June.
    16. Arthur J. Rolnick & Warren E. Weber, 1986. "Inherent Instability in Banking: The Free Banking Experience," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 5(3), pages 877-890, Winter.
    17. Bagwell, Kyle & Staiger, Robert W., 1989. "The role of export subsidies when product quality is unknown," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(1-2), pages 69-89, August.
    18. Brooks, Jonathan, 1995. "Policies and institutions in transition economies: a political economy perspective on the agri-food sector," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 487-500, December.
    19. baharumshah, ahmad, 1992. "Income Redistribution Through Commodity Programmes and the Marginal Welfare Cost of Taxation," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 25(June), pages 47-61.
    20. Walsh, Patrick, 1991. "A general framework for analysing endogenous trade divergences," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 6780, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    PRIX MINIMUM GARANTI AU PRODUCTEUR;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02840974. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.