IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01796507.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Erratum to: A Twenty-First Century Assessment of Values Across the Global Workforce

Author

Listed:
  • David Ralston

    (BGU - Ben-Gurion University of the Negev)

  • Carolyn Egri
  • Emmanuelle Reynaud

    (AMU IAE - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Aix-en-Provence - AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

  • Narasimhan Srinivasan
  • Olivier Furrer
  • David Brock
  • Ruth Alas
  • Florian Wangenheim
  • Fidel León Darder
  • Christine Kuo
  • Vojko Potocan
  • Audra Mockaitis
  • Erna Szabo
  • Jaime Ruiz Gutiérrez
  • Andre Pekerti
  • Arif Butt
  • Ian Palmer
  • Irina Naoumova
  • Tomasz Lenartowicz
  • Arunas Starkus
  • Vu Thanh Hung
  • Tevfik Dalgic
  • Mario Molteni
  • María Teresa de La Garza Carranza
  • Isabelle Maignan
  • Francisco Castro
  • Yong-Lin Moon
  • Jane Terpstra-Tong
  • Marina Dabic
  • Yongjuan Li
  • Wade Danis
  • Maria Kangasniemi
  • Mahfooz Ansari
  • Liesl Riddle
  • Laurie Milton
  • Philip Hallinger
  • Detelin Elenkov
  • Ilya Girson
  • Modesta Gelbuda
  • Prem Ramburuth
  • Tania Casado
  • Ana Maria Rossi
  • Malika Richards
  • Cheryl van Deusen
  • Ping-Ping Fu
  • Paulina Man Kei Wan
  • Moureen Tang
  • Chay-Hoon Lee
  • Ho-Beng Chia
  • Yongquin Fan
  • Alan Wallace

Abstract

This article provides current Schwartz Values Survey (SVS) data from samples of business managers and professionals across 50 societies that are culturally and socioeconomically diverse. We report the society scores for SVS values dimensions for both individual- and societal-level analyses. At the individual-level, we report on the ten circumplex values sub-dimensions and two sets of values dimensions (collectivism and individualism; openness to change, conservation, self-enhancement, and self-transcendence). At the societal-level, we report on the values dimensions of embeddedness, hierarchy, mastery, affective autonomy, intellectual autonomy, egalitarianism, and harmony. For each society, we report the Cronbach's α statistics for each values dimension scale to assess their internal consistency (reliability) as well as report interrater agreement (IRA) analyses to assess the acceptability of using aggregated individual level values scores to represent country values. We also examined whether societal development level is related to systematic variation in the measurement and importance of values. Thus, the contributions of our evaluation of the SVS values dimensions are two-fold. First, we identify the SVS dimensions that have cross-culturally internally reliable structures and within-society agreement for business professionals. Second, we report the society cultural values scores developed from the twenty-first century data that can be used as macro-level predictors in multilevel and single-level international business research.

Suggested Citation

  • David Ralston & Carolyn Egri & Emmanuelle Reynaud & Narasimhan Srinivasan & Olivier Furrer & David Brock & Ruth Alas & Florian Wangenheim & Fidel León Darder & Christine Kuo & Vojko Potocan & Audra Mo, 2011. "Erratum to: A Twenty-First Century Assessment of Values Across the Global Workforce," Post-Print hal-01796507, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01796507
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-011-1106-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zlatko Nedelko & Vojko Potocan, 2021. "Sustainability of Organizations: The Contribution of Personal Values to Democratic Leadership Behavior Focused on the Sustainability of Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Marina Dabic & Vojko Potocan & Zlatko Nedelko, 2017. "Personal values supporting enterprises’ innovations in the creative economy," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 8(4), pages 1241-1261, December.
    3. Rok Črešnar & Zlatko Nedelko, 2020. "Understanding Future Leaders: How Are Personal Values of Generations Y and Z Tailored to Leadership in Industry 4.0?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-19, May.
    4. I-Fang Cheng & Che-Jen Su & Hsin-Hsing Liao & Nicolas Lorgnier & Anne-Marie Lebrun & Wen-Shen Yen & Yi-Fang Lan & Yingfang Huang, 2019. "Adolescents’ perceptions of mother–father dominance in family vacation decisions: a 25-society study," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 13(4), pages 755-778, December.
    5. Luis M. Arciniega & Laura J. Stanley & Diana Puga-Méndez & Dalia Obregón-Schael & Isaac Politi-Salame, 2019. "The Relationship Between Individual Work Values and Unethical Decision-Making and Behavior at Work," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(4), pages 1133-1148, September.
    6. Sjoerd Beugelsdijk & Björn Ambos & Phillip C Nell, 2018. "Conceptualizing and measuring distance in international business research: Recurring questions and best practice guidelines," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 49(9), pages 1113-1137, December.
    7. Tausch, Arno, 2015. "Hofstede, Inglehart and beyond. New directions in empirical global value research," MPRA Paper 64282, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 11 May 2015.
    8. María Teresa de la Garza Carranza & Eugenio Guzmán Soria & Jorge Armando López Lemus & Virginia Susana Soto Hernández, 2019. "Engagement of Mexican Millennials at Work in Relation to their Expectations," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(8), pages 71-80, August.
    9. Mark F Peterson & Tais S Barreto, 2018. "Interpreting societal culture value dimensions," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 49(9), pages 1190-1207, December.
    10. Dabić, Marina & Maley, Jane F. & Črešnar, Rok & Nedelko, Zlatko, 2023. "Unappreciated channel of manufacturing productivity under industry 4.0: Leadership values and capabilities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    11. Heidi A. Wayment & Jack J. Bauer, 2018. "The Quiet Ego: Motives for Self-Other Balance and Growth in Relation to Well-Being," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 881-896, March.
    12. Donald G. Gardner & Vathsala Wickramasinghe, 2023. "Relationships between Leadership Styles and Prosocial Motivation Depend on Cultural Values: A Case Study in Sri Lanka," Merits, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-14, July.
    13. Vojko Potocan & Zlatko Nedelko & Matjaz Mulej & Marina Dabic, 2021. "How University’s Activities Support the Development of Students’ Entrepreneurial Abilities: Case of Slovenia and Croatia," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(1), pages 22-40, March.
    14. Terpstra-Tong, Jane & Ralston, David A. & Treviño, Len J. & Naoumova, Irina & de la Garza Carranza, María Teresa & Furrer, Olivier & Li, Yongjuan & Darder, Fidel León, 2020. "The Quality of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX): A Multilevel Analysis of Individual-level, Organizational-level and Societal-level Antecedents," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(3).
    15. M. Mulej & Vojko Potocan & Zlatko Nedelko, 2015. "A New Socio-economic Order: Evidence About Employees' Values' Influence on Corporate Social Responsibility," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 230-239, March.
    16. Marshall Schminke & Anke Arnaud & Regina Taylor, 2015. "Ethics, Values, and Organizational Justice: Individuals, Organizations, and Beyond," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(3), pages 727-736, September.
    17. Michael A. Sartor & Paul W. Beamish, 2020. "Private Sector Corruption, Public Sector Corruption and the Organizational Structure of Foreign Subsidiaries," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(4), pages 725-744, December.
    18. Mulej, Matjaž & Potočan, Vojko, 2016. "Plenary Lecture: Knowledge Management or Knowledge-Cum-Values-Management?," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2016), Rovinj, Croatia, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Rovinj, Croatia, 8-9 September 2016, pages 1-9, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.
    19. Ženko Zdenka & Mulej Matjaž & Potočan Vojko, 2017. "Knowledge-cum-values Management belongs to the Way out from Global Crisis," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 113-123, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01796507. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.