IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01780623.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Innovation managériale… ou pas ? Design d'une méthodologie d'analyse critique des objets de management

Author

Listed:
  • Sonia Adam-Ledunois

    (NIMEC - Normandie Innovation Marché Entreprise Consommation - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - ULH - Université Le Havre Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UNIROUEN - Université de Rouen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - IRIHS - Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire Homme et Société - UNIROUEN - Université de Rouen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université)

  • Sébastien Damart

    (DRM - Dauphine Recherches en Management - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Depuis plus d'une décennie maintenant, la thématique de l'innovation managériale est l'objet d'une attention croissante. La littérature a identifié les enjeux associés à chaque phase du cycle de vie des objets de management innovant (émergence, adoption, diffusion, etc.), les antécédents de l'innovation managériale ou encore les liens entre différentes variables de la performance et l'innovation en management. Une revue de la littérature aide à identifier les deux dimensions sur lesquelles il est possible de qualifier les ruptures constitutives d'une innovation managériale. L'une, fondée sur le caractère relatif de l'innovation managériale (relatif au contexte organisationnel), conduit à localiser l'innovation managériale au cœur de l'organisation qu'elle sert. L'autre, fondée sur le caractère absolu de l'innovation managériale (par rapport à l'état de l'art), conduit à sortir l'innovation de son contexte organisationnel et à en observer les singularités conceptuelles. Détecter, analyser, qualifier l'innovation managériale requiert des méthodologies de repérages et de caractérisation critique de ces objets. Celles-ci n'ont, à notre connaissance, jamais été identifiées ou discutées. Ces méthodes devraient servir à établir la nature innovante de l'objet de management présumé innovant. La présente contribution propose une approche méthodologique pour qualifier et caractériser la nature des innovations managériales. Elle s'appuie sur une distinction des ruptures contextuelle et conceptuelle mises en évidence par la revue de littérature sur les innovations managériales. La méthodologie proposée, supportée par une représentation ensembliste des caractéristiques des objets de management présumés innovants, conduit à identifier des « zones de singularité » : zone de singularité contextuelle, zone de singularité conceptuelle, ou zone de singularité radicale. Par ailleurs, la méthodologie propose de décaler l'analyse d'un objet de management en changeant de filtre lié à son domaine d'usage pour faire apparaître des zones de singularité dérivées. Deux cas ont été utilisés pour tester la valeur de cette proposition méthodologique et des concepts qui l'accompagnent : le cas du management sans objectifs mis en place dans une mutuelle d'assurance française (que nous nommerons MA) et celui des Cafés Numériques conçus et mobilisés chez Orange, groupe de télécommunications français.

Suggested Citation

  • Sonia Adam-Ledunois & Sébastien Damart, 2016. "Innovation managériale… ou pas ? Design d'une méthodologie d'analyse critique des objets de management," Post-Print hal-01780623, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01780623
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01780623
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01780623/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hélène Giroux, 2006. "‘It Was Such a Handy Term’: Management Fashions and Pragmatic Ambiguity," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(6), pages 1227-1260, September.
    2. Mol, Michael J. & Birkinshaw, Julian, 2009. "The sources of management innovation: When firms introduce new management practices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(12), pages 1269-1280, December.
    3. Sébastien Damart & Bernard Roy, 2009. "The uses of cost-benefit analysis in public transportation decision-making in France," Post-Print hal-00414462, HAL.
    4. Camisón, César & Villar-López, Ana, 2014. "Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 2891-2902.
    5. Mary M. Crossan & Marina Apaydin, 2010. "A Multi‐Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(6), pages 1154-1191, September.
    6. Danny Miller & Peter H. Friesen, 1978. "Archetypes of Strategy Formulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(9), pages 921-933, May.
    7. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2673 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Kenneth E. Knight, 1967. "A Descriptive Model of the Intra-Firm Innovation Process," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 40, pages 478-478.
    9. Currie, W. L., 1999. "Revisiting management innovation and change programmes: strategic vision or tunnel vision?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 647-660, December.
    10. Wright, Christopher & Sturdy, Andrew & Wylie, Nick, 2012. "Management innovation through standardization: Consultants as standardizers of organizational practice," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 652-662.
    11. Albert David, 2013. "Management Innovation, a Genealogical Perspective: The Case of Drucker's Management by Objectives and Self-Control," Post-Print hal-01635098, HAL.
    12. repec:dau:papers:123456789/13988 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil & Armand Hatchuel, 2010. "Strategic Management of Design and Innovation," Post-Print hal-00696953, HAL.
    14. Timothy Clark & Graeme Salaman, 1998. "Telling Tales: Management Gurus' Narratives and the Construction of Managerial Identity," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 137-161, March.
    15. Ignacio G. Vaccaro & Justin J. P. Jansen & Frans A. J. Van Den Bosch & Henk W. Volberda, 2012. "Management Innovation and Leadership: The Moderating Role of Organizational Size," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 28-51, January.
    16. Pete Thomas, 2003. "The Recontextualization of Management: A Discourse‐based Approach to Analysing the Development of Management Thinking," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 775-801, June.
    17. Paul M. Hirsch & Daniel Z. Levin, 1999. "Umbrella Advocates Versus Validity Police: A Life-Cycle Model," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 199-212, April.
    18. Fariborz Damanpour & Kathryn A. Szabat & William M. Evan, 1989. "The Relationship Between Types Of Innovation And Organizational Performance," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(6), pages 587-602, November.
    19. Damart, Sébastien & Roy, Bernard, 2009. "The uses of cost-benefit analysis in public transportation decision-making in France," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 200-212, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khosravi, Pouria & Newton, Cameron & Rezvani, Azadeh, 2019. "Management innovation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of past decades of research," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 694-707.
    2. Lurdes Barroso Simao & Luísa Cagica Carvalho & Maria José Madeira, 2021. "Intellectual structure of management innovation: bibliometric analysis," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(3), pages 651-677, July.
    3. Hervas-Oliver, Jose-Luis & Sempere-Ripoll, Francisca, 2015. "Disentangling the influence of technological process and product innovations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 109-118.
    4. Marlenne G. Velazquez-Cazares & Anna M. Gil-Lafuente & Ernesto Leon-Castro & Fabio Blanco-Mesa, 2021. "Innovation capabilities measurement using fuzzy methodologies: a Colombian SMEs case," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 384-413, December.
    5. Nieves, Julia & Segarra-Ciprés, Mercedes, 2015. "Management innovation in the hotel industry," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 51-58.
    6. Esa Hiltunen & Outi-Maaria Palo-oja & Markus Perkkiö, 2021. "Creating and Implementing Standardized Management Innovation in a Large Organization," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 10(1), pages 77-87, April.
    7. Teresa Kraśnicka & Wojciech Głód & Martyna Wronka-Pośpiech, 2016. "Management Innovation and Its Measurement," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 12(2), pages 95-121.
    8. Sébastien Damart & Albert David & Milena Klasing Chen & Dominique Laousse, 2018. "Turning managers into management designers : an experiment," Post-Print hal-01921127, HAL.
    9. Teresa Kraśnicka & Wojciech Głód & Martyna Wronka-Pośpiech, 2018. "Management innovation, pro-innovation organisational culture and enterprise performance: testing the mediation effect," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 737-769, July.
    10. Sébastien Damart & Albert David & Milena Klasing Chen & Dominique Laousse, 2018. "Turning managers into management designers: an experiment," Post-Print hal-01894955, HAL.
    11. Józef Ober, 2020. "Innovation Adoption: Empirical Analysis on the Example of Selected Factors of Organizational Culture in the IT Industry in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-25, October.
    12. Marc Janka & Xaver Heinicke & Thomas W. Guenther, 2020. "Beyond the “good” and “evil” of stability values in organizational culture for managerial innovation: the crucial role of management controls," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 14(6), pages 1363-1404, December.
    13. Ewelina Zarzycka & Justyna Dobroszek & Lauri Lepistö & Sinikka Moilanen, 2019. "Coexistence of innovation and standardization: evidence from the lean environment of business process outsourcing," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 251-286, October.
    14. Cécile Ayerbe & Sandra Dubouloz & Sophie Mignon & Marc Robert, 2020. "Management Innovation and Open Innovation: For and Towards Dialogue," Post-Print hal-02985953, HAL.
    15. Bilal Bourkha & Adam Dewitte & Jeremy Tantely Ranjatoelina, 2015. "Organiser l'imitation d'un business model innovant : quatre propositions pour les entreprises," Working Papers hal-01202625, HAL.
    16. O'Brien, Kieran, 2020. "Innovation types and the search for new ideas at the fuzzy front end: Where to look and how often?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 13-24.
    17. Kyungbo Park & Jeonghwa Cha & Jongyi Hong, 2023. "Developing a Framework for Evaluating and Predicting Management Innovation in Public Research Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
    18. Rachel Bocquet & Sandra Dubouloz, 2020. "Firm Openness and Managerial Innovation: Rebalancing Deliberate Actions and Institutional Pressures," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 43-74.
    19. Christian Rupietta & Johannes Meuer & Uschi Backes-Gellner, 2018. "How do apprentices moderate the influence of organizational innovation on the technological innovation process?," Economics of Education Working Paper Series 0145, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW), revised Jan 2021.
    20. Ganter, Alois & Hecker, Achim, 2014. "Configurational paths to organizational innovation: qualitative comparative analyses of antecedents and contingencies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(6), pages 1285-1292.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01780623. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.