IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01113938.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Reconstructing the world trade multiplex: the role of intensive and extensive biases

Author

Listed:
  • Rossana Mastrandrea

    (CPT - E5 Physique statistique et systèmes complexes - CPT - Centre de Physique Théorique - UMR 7332 - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, CPT - Centre de Physique Théorique - UMR 7332 - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institute of Economics of Sant'Anna [Pisa] - SSSUP - Scuola Universitaria Superiore Sant'Anna [Pisa])

  • Squartini Tiziano

    (ISC - Istituto Sistemi Complessi [ROME] - CNR - National Research Council of Italy | Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, INSTITUUT LORENTZ - Instituut Lorentz - Universiteit Leiden = Leiden University)

  • Giorgio Fagiolo

    (Institute of Economics of Sant'Anna [Pisa] - SSSUP - Scuola Universitaria Superiore Sant'Anna [Pisa])

  • Diego Garlaschelli

    (INSTITUUT LORENTZ - Instituut Lorentz - Universiteit Leiden = Leiden University)

Abstract

In economic and financial networks, the strength of each node has always an important economic meaning, such as the size of supply and demand, import and export, or financial exposure. Constructing null models of networks matching the observed strengths of all nodes is crucial in order to either detect interesting deviations of an empirical network from economically meaningful benchmarks or reconstruct the most likely structure of an economic network when the latter is unknown. However, several studies have proved that real economic networks and multiplexes topologically differ from configurations inferred only from node strengths. Here we provide a detailed analysis of the world trade multiplex by comparing it to an enhanced null model that simultaneously reproduces the strength and the degree of each node. We study several temporal snapshots and almost 100 layers (commodity classes) of the multiplex and find that the observed properties are systematically well reproduced by our model. Our formalism allows us to introduce the (static) concept of extensive and intensive bias, defined as a measurable tendency of the network to prefer either the formation of extra links or the reinforcement of link weights, with respect to a reference case where only strengths are enforced. Our findings complement the existing economic literature on (dynamic) intensive and extensive trade margins. More generally, they show that real-world multiplexes can be strongly shaped by layer-specific local constraints.

Suggested Citation

  • Rossana Mastrandrea & Squartini Tiziano & Giorgio Fagiolo & Diego Garlaschelli, 2014. "Reconstructing the world trade multiplex: the role of intensive and extensive biases," Post-Print hal-01113938, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01113938
    DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.062804
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01113938
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01113938/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1103/PhysRevE.90.062804?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Hummels & Peter J. Klenow, 2002. "The Variety and Quality of a Nation's Trade," NBER Working Papers 8712, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Assaf Almog & Rhys Bird & Diego Garlaschelli, 2015. "Enhanced Gravity Model of trade: reconciling macroeconomic and network models," Papers 1506.00348, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2019.
    2. Di Vece, Marzio & Garlaschelli, Diego & Squartini, Tiziano, 2023. "Reconciling econometrics with continuous maximum-entropy network models," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    3. Bartesaghi, Paolo & Clemente, Gian Paolo & Grassi, Rosanna, 2023. "Clustering coefficients as measures of the complex interactions in a directed weighted multilayer network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 610(C).
    4. Sun, Qingru & Gao, Xiangyun & Zhong, Weiqiong & Liu, Nairong, 2017. "The stability of the international oil trade network from short-term and long-term perspectives," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 482(C), pages 345-356.
    5. Luu, Duc Thi & Lux, Thomas, 2018. "Multilayer overlaps and correlations in the bank-firm credit network of Spain," Economics Working Papers 2018-04, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Department of Economics.
    6. Jeroen van Lidth de Jeude & Riccardo Di Clemente & Guido Caldarelli & Fabio Saracco & Tiziano Squartini, 2019. "Reconstructing Mesoscale Network Structures," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-13, January.
    7. Paolo Bartesaghi & Gian Paolo Clemente & Rosanna Grassi, 2022. "Clustering coefficients as measures of the complex interactions in a directed weighted multilayer network," Papers 2206.06309, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    8. Zhuo-Ming Ren & An Zeng & Yi-Cheng Zhang, 2020. "Bridging nestedness and economic complexity in multilayer world trade networks," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, December.
    9. Luiz G. A. Alves & Giuseppe Mangioni & Isabella Cingolani & Francisco A. Rodrigues & Pietro Panzarasa & Yamir Moreno, 2018. "The nested structural organization of the worldwide trade multi-layer network," Papers 1803.02872, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2019.
    10. Zhang, Xiaohang & Cui, Huiyuan & Zhu, Ji & Du, Yu & Wang, Qi & Shi, Wenhua, 2017. "Measuring the dissimilarity of multiplex networks: An empirical study of international trade networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 467(C), pages 380-394.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert C. Feenstra & Barbara J. Spencer, 2005. "Contractual Versus Generic Outsourcing: The Role of Proximity," NBER Working Papers 11885, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Hillberry, Russell H. & McDaniel, Christine A., 2002. "A Decomposition of North American Trade Growth since NAFTA," Working Papers 15866, United States International Trade Commission, Office of Economics.
    3. Bulent Unel, 2013. "The Interaction Between Technology Adoption and Trade When Firms are Heterogeneous," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(4), pages 797-808, September.
    4. Deborah Swenson, 2005. "Outsourcing Price Decisions: Evidence from U.S. 9802 Imports," NBER Working Papers 11184, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Costas Arkolakis & Svetlana Demidova & Peter J. Klenow & Andres Rodriguez-Clare, 2008. "Endogenous Variety and the Gains from Trade," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 98(2), pages 444-450, May.
    6. Naknoi, Kanda, 2008. "Real exchange rate fluctuations, endogenous tradability and exchange rate regimes," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 645-663, April.
    7. Tarasov, Alexander, 2012. "Per capita income, market access costs, and trade volumes," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 284-294.
    8. Christian Hepenstrick & Alexander Tarasov, 2015. "Per capita income and the extensive margin of bilateral trade," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(4), pages 1561-1599, November.
    9. Katharina Eck, 2009. "Decomposing a decade's growth of Central and Eastern Europe's trade," Memoranda - Policy Papers 40, Institut für Ost- und Südosteuropaforschung (Institute for East and Southeast European Studies).
    10. Robert Feenstra & Hiau Looi Kee, 2004. "On the Measurement of Product Variety in Trade," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 94(2), pages 145-149, May.
    11. Rossana Mastrandrea & Tiziano Squartini & Giorgio Fagiolo & Diego Garlaschelli, 2014. "Intensive and extensive biases in economic networks: reconstructing world trade," LEM Papers Series 2014/06, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    12. Persson, Maria, 2008. "Trade Facilitation and the Extensive and Intensive Margins of Trade," Working Papers 2008:13, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    13. Wolfgang Keller & Ben Li & Carol H. Shiue, 2011. "China’s Foreign Trade: Perspectives From the Past 150 Years," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(6), pages 853-892, June.
    14. Sampath Jayasinghe & John C. Beghin & Giancarlo Moschini, 2017. "Determinants Of World Demand For U.S. Corn Seeds: The Role Of Trade Costs," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: John Christopher Beghin (ed.), Nontariff Measures and International Trade, chapter 17, pages 309-320, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    15. Nirvikar Singh, 2008. "Transaction costs, information technology and development," Indian Growth and Development Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 1(2), pages 212-236, September.
    16. repec:zbw:bofitp:2003_017 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Cephas Naanwaab & Osei-Agyeman Yeboah, 2014. "A partial equilibrium analysis of NAFTA's impact on U.S. bilateral trade," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), International Hellenic University (IHU), Kavala Campus, Greece (formerly Eastern Macedonia and Thrace Institute of Technology - EMaTTech), vol. 7(1), pages 89-112, April.
    18. Zahler, Andrés, 2007. "Decomposing world export growth and the relevance of new destinations," MPRA Paper 30295, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Vanzetti, David & Huong, Pham Lan, 2006. "Vietnam’s Trade Policy Dilemmas," Conference papers 331444, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    20. Arnaud Costinot & Jonathan Vogel & Su Wang, 2013. "An Elementary Theory of Global Supply Chains," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 80(1), pages 109-144.
    21. Funke, Michael & Ruhwedel, Ralf, 2003. "Trade, product variety and welfare: a quantitative assessment for the transition economies in Central and Eastern Europe," BOFIT Discussion Papers 17/2003, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01113938. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.