Can open source projects succeed when the producers are not users? Lessons from the data processing field
AbstractFree/Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) proposes an original way to solve the incentive dilemma for the production of information goods, based on von ippel's user-as-innovator principle (1988): as users benefit from innovation, they have incentive to produce it, and as they can expect cumulative innovation on their own proposition, they have incentive to share it. But what is the incentive for producers when they are not users? We discuss this question via a quantitative study of FLOSS projects in "algorithm-based industries". We find that in that case producers hardly participate in such projects.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by HAL in its series Post-Print with number hal-00737173.
Date of creation: 2012
Date of revision:
Publication status: Published, Management international = International management = Gestión internacional, 2012, 16, 113-127
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00737173
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/
Knowledge economics; Sociology; Open source; Science; Standardization; JEL: O31; O32;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- JEL - Labor and Demographic Economics - - - - -
- O31 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Technological Change; Research and Development; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
- O32 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Technological Change; Research and Development; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2012-10-13 (All new papers)
- NEP-IPR-2012-10-13 (Intellectual Property Rights)
- NEP-PPM-2012-10-13 (Project, Program & Portfolio Management)
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Jean-Benoît Zimmermann, 1995.
"Le concept de grappes technologiques. Un cadre formel,"
Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(5), pages 1263-1295.
- Jean-Benoît Zimmermann, 1995. "Le concept de grappes technologiques. Un cadre formel," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 46(5), pages 1263-1295.
- Nicolas JULLIEN & Karine Roudaut & Sandrine Le Squin, 2011.
"L'engagement dans des collectifs de production de connaissance en ligne. Le cas GeoRezo,"
- Nicolas Jullien & Karine Roudaut & Sandrine Le Squin, 2011. "L'engagement dans des collectifs de production de connaissance en ligne. Le cas GeoRezo," Revue française de socio-Economie, La découverte, vol. 0(2), pages 59-83.
- Langlois, Richard N. & Robertson, Paul L., 1992. "Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 297-313, August.
- Bengt-ake Lundvall & Bjorn Johnson, 1994. "The Learning Economy," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 23-42.
- Bruce Kogut & Anca Metiu, 2001. "Open-Source Software Development and Distributed Innovation," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 17(2), pages 248-264, Summer.
- Lee, Sang-Yong Tom & Kim, Hee-Woong & Gupta, Sumeet, 2009. "Measuring open source software success," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 426-438, April.
- Katz, Michael L & Shapiro, Carl, 1985. "Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(3), pages 424-40, June.
- von Krogh, Georg & Spaeth, Sebastian & Lakhani, Karim R., 2003. "Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: a case study," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1217-1241, July.
- Sonali K. Shah, 2006. "Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(7), pages 1000-1014, July.
- Roger Koppl & Richard Langlois, 2001. "Organizations and Language Games," Journal of Management and Governance, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 287-305, September.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.