This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Open Source Licensing in Mixed Markets, or Why Open Source Software Does Not Succeed

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Alexia Gaudeul () (School of Economics and Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

The rivalry between developers of open source and proprietary software encourages open source developers to court users and respond to their needs. If the open source developer wants to promote her own open source standard and solutions, she may choose liberal license terms such as those of the Berkeley Software Distribution as proprietary developers will then find it easier to adopt her standard in their products. If she wants to promote the use of open source software per se, she may use more restrictive license terms such as the General Public License to discourage proprietary appropriation of her effort. I show that open source software that comes late into a market will be less likely than more innovative open source software to be compatible with proprietary software, but is also more likely to be made more accessible to inexperienced users.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.ccp.uea.ac.uk/publicfiles/workingpapers/CCP08-2.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia in its series Working Papers with number 08-2.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Length: 31 pages
Date of creation: Feb 2008
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ccp:wpaper:wp08-02

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Norwich, NR4 7TJ
Phone: +44(0)1603 593715
Fax: +44(0)1603 591622
Email:
Web page: http://www.ccp.uea.ac.uk
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Cheryl Whittkaer).

Related research
Keywords: open source software standards compatibility network effects duopoly mixed markets intellectual property copyright licensing

Find related papers by JEL classification:
D23 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights
H41 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Public Goods
L13 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets
L22 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Organization and Market Structure
L31 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Nonprofit Institutions; NGOs
L86 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software
O34 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Technological Change - - - Intellectual Property Rights
O38 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Technological Change - - - Government Policy

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? IDEAS was launched in September 1997.

This page was last updated on 2008-10-2.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.