Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Modèle bioéconomique appliqué à la gestion du sanglier, dégâts agricoles et prix des chasses en forêt domaniale

Contents:

Author Info

  • Carole. Ropars-Collet

    ()
    (SMART - Structures et Marché Agricoles, Ressources et Territoires - Agrocampus Ouest - Institut national de la recherche agronomique (INRA) : UMR1302)

  • Philippe Le Goffe

    ()
    (SMART - Structures et Marché Agricoles, Ressources et Territoires - Agrocampus Ouest - Institut national de la recherche agronomique (INRA) : UMR1302)

Abstract

Le sanglier est à la fois une ressource et un nuisible : gibier valorisé par les chasseurs et responsable de dommages collectifs, notamment agricoles. Le papier s'intéresse au contrôle des populations de gibier. Notre analyse est basée sur un modèle bioéconomique. La population optimale correspond à la maximisation de la valeur présente de la richesse collective liée à la présence du sanglier, c'est-à-dire le flux actualisé sur un horizon infini du consentement à payer des chasseurs diminué des dommages agricoles. Nous prenons en compte la perte de bien-être d'une réduction des populations supportée par tous les chasseurs. Pour l'analyse empirique, nous avons reconstruit la dynamique des populations de sanglier à partir des données sur les dégâts agricoles. L'analyse des prix des adjudications des chasses en forêt domaniale a permis de révéler la demande de chasse au sanglier, en utilisant la méthode des prix hédonistes. Les solutions d'équilibre de long terme obtenues permettent d'apporter un éclairage sur la politique optimale de contrôle des populations de sanglier.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://hal-agrocampus-ouest.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/73/00/19/PDF/A3_-_Ropars.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by HAL in its series Post-Print with number hal-00730019.

as in new window
Length:
Date of creation: 09 Dec 2009
Date of revision:
Publication status: Published - Presented, 3èmes journées INRA-SFER-CIRAD de recherches en sciences sociales, 2009, Montpellier (FR), France
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00730019

Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: http://hal-agrocampus-ouest.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00730019
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/

Related research

Keywords: MODELE ; GESTION ; PRIX ; ECONOMIE DE L'ENVIRONNEMENT ; MODELE BIOECONOMIQUE ; CHASSE ; DEGATS AGRICOLES ; PRIX HEDONISTES ; BIOECONOMIC MODEL ; MANAGEMENT ; HUNTING ; AGRICULTURAL DAMAGES ; HEDONIC APPROACH;

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Pope, C. Arden, III & Stoll, John R., 1985. "The Market Value Of Ingress Rights For White-Tailed Deer Hunting In Texas," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 17(01), July.
  2. Rosen, Sherwin, 1974. "Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 82(1), pages 34-55, Jan.-Feb..
  3. Kerry R. Livengood, 1983. "Value of Big Game from Markets for Hunting Leases: The Hedonic Approach," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 59(3), pages 287-291.
  4. Knoche, Scott & Lupi, Frank, 2007. "Valuing deer hunting ecosystem services from farm landscapes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 313-320, December.
  5. Anders Skonhoft, 2005. "The costs and benefits of animal predation: An analysis of Scandinavian wolf re-colonization," Working Paper Series, Department of Economics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology 5505, Department of Economics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
  6. Philippe Le Goffe, 2000. "Hedonic Pricing of Agriculture and Forestry Externalities," Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 15(4), pages 397-401, April.
  7. Henderson, Jason R. & Moore, Sean, 2006. "The Capitalization of Wildlife Recreation Income into Farmland Values," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 38(03), December.
  8. Rondeau, Daniel, 2001. "Along the Way Back from the Brink," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 156-182, September.
  9. Donald J. Cocheba & William A. Langford, 1978. "Wildlife Valuation: The Collective Good Aspect of Hunting," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 54(4), pages 490-504.
  10. Richard Horan & Erwin Bulte, 2004. "Optimal and Open Access Harvesting of Multi-Use Species in a Second-Best World," Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 28(3), pages 251-272, July.
  11. Messonnier, Mark L. & Luzar, E. Jane, 1990. "A Hedonic Analysis Of Private Hunting Land Attributes Using An Alternative Functional Form," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 22(02), December.
  12. Luzar, E. Jane & Gan, Christopher E.C. & Kanjilal, Barun & Messonnier, Mark L., 1992. "Quality As A Latent Variable In Recreation Access Analysis," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 24(02), December.
  13. Loomis, John & Griffin, Dana & Wu, Ellen & González-Cabán, Armando, 2002. "Estimating the economic value of big game habitat production from prescribed fire using a time series approach," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 119-129.
  14. Kelvin J. Lancaster, 1966. "A New Approach to Consumer Theory," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 74, pages 132.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00730019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.