IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gws/dpaper/03-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

PANTA RHEI V -Modelldarstellung und Prognose der CO2-Emissionen

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Distelkamp

    (GWS - Institute of Economic Structures Research)

  • Frank Hohmann

    (GWS - Institute of Economic Structures Research)

  • Dr. Christian Lutz

    (GWS - Institute of Economic Structures Research)

  • Prof. Dr. Bernd Meyer

    (GWS - Institute of Economic Structures Research)

  • Marc Ingo Wolter

    (GWS - Institute of Economic Structures Research)

Abstract

Das Statistische Bundesamt hat der GWS mbH den Auftrag erteilt, für die Jahre 1991 bis 1994 jährliche Input-Output-Tabellen in der Gliederung der NACE unter Berücksichtigung der vorhandenen Tabellen in der alten Gliederung zu ermitteln, diese Zeitreihe dann unter Verwendung der vorhandenen NACE-Tabellen für 1995 und 1997 jährlich fortzuschreiben und kumulierte CO2-Emissionen für die Jahre 2001 bis 2010 zu prognostizieren. Im Abschnitt 2 wird das umweltökonometrische Modell PANTA RHEI V vorgestellt, das auf der Basis der im Projekt berechneten Zeitreihe von Input-Output-Tabellen, den Daten der Umweltökonomischen Gesamtrechnungen zu den Energieverbräuchen und CO2-Emissionen nach Energieträgern und Verwendungsbereichen und weiterer Daten erstellt worden ist. Es handelt sich um eine Weiterentwicklung des in vielen Prognose- und Simulationsrechnungen bewährten Modells PANTA RHEI IV. Das neue Modell wird dann dazu verwendet, die kumulierten CO2-Emissionen jährlich bis zum Jahre 2010 zu prognostizieren. Die Ergebnisse dieser Rechnungen sind im Abschnitt 3 dargestellt. Es zeigt auf der Basis der derzeitigen umwelt- und wirtschaftspolitischen Rahmenbedingungen, dass sowohl bei einer günstigen als auch bei einer schwächeren weltwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung das Kyoto-Ziel von 780 Millionen Tonnen CO2-Emissionen für Deutschland im Jahre 2010 nicht erreicht werden kann. Es wird im einzelnen dargelegt, welche Entwicklungen bei der Energienachfrage dafür verantwortlich sind. Zusammenfassend kann festgestellt werden, dass das Wachstum der Energieproduktivität in Deutschland nicht ausreichen wird, um Wirtschaftswachstum und Energieverbrauch vollständig zu entkoppeln. Die zu erwartenden Entwicklungen bei der Zusammensetzung des Energieverbrauchs in Richtung auf CO2-arme Energieträger werden deshalb auch nur ausreichen, um die kumulierten CO2-Emissionen bei günstiger weltwirtschaftlicher Entwicklung etwa auf dem heutigen Niveau zu halten. Im folgenden werden das zur Prognose eingesetzte Modell selbst und die Ergebnisse dokumentiert.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Distelkamp & Frank Hohmann & Dr. Christian Lutz & Prof. Dr. Bernd Meyer & Marc Ingo Wolter, 2003. "PANTA RHEI V -Modelldarstellung und Prognose der CO2-Emissionen," GWS Discussion Paper Series 03-1, GWS - Institute of Economic Structures Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:gws:dpaper:03-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://papers.gws-os.com/gws-paper03-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bach, Stefan & Kohlhaas, Michael & Meyer, Bernd & Praetorius, Barbara & Welsch, Heinz, 2002. "The effects of environmental fiscal reform in Germany: a simulation study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(9), pages 803-811, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alberto Gago & Xavier Labandeira & Xiral López Otero, 2014. "A Panorama on Energy Taxes and Green Tax Reforms," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 208(1), pages 145-190, March.
    2. Meyer, Bernd & Distelkamp, Martin & Wolter, Marc Ingo, 2007. "Material efficiency and economic-environmental sustainability. Results of simulations for Germany with the model PANTA RHEI," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 192-200, June.
    3. Barker, Terry & Junankar, Sudhir & Pollitt, Hector & Summerton, Philip, 2007. "Carbon leakage from unilateral Environmental Tax Reforms in Europe, 1995-2005," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 6281-6292, December.
    4. Dalia Streimikiene & Indre Siksnelyte & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro, 2018. "The Impact of Greening Tax Systems on Sustainable Energy Development in the Baltic States," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-29, May.
    5. Christoph Böhringer & Andreas Löschel & Heinz Welsch, 2008. "Environmental Taxation and Induced Structural Change in an Open Economy: The Role of Market Structure," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 9(1), pages 17-40, February.
    6. Orlov, Anton & Grethe, Harald & McDonald, Scott, 2013. "Carbon taxation in Russia: Prospects for a double dividend and improved energy efficiency," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 128-140.
    7. Barker, Terry & Ekins, Paul & Foxon, Tim, 2007. "Macroeconomic effects of efficiency policies for energy-intensive industries: The case of the UK Climate Change Agreements, 2000-2010," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 760-778, July.
    8. Samantak Das & Dripto Mukhopadhyay & Sanjib Pohit, 2005. "Mitigating Carbon Emission through Economic Instruments : An Indian Perspective," Energy Working Papers 22132, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    9. Immervoll, Herwig & Linden, Jules & O'Donoghue, Cathal & Sologon, Denisa Maria, 2023. "Who Pays for Higher Carbon Prices? Illustration for Lithuania and a Research Agenda," IZA Discussion Papers 15868, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Jarmila Zimmermannová & Michal Menšík, 2013. "Ex post analýza zavedení zdanění pevných paliv, zemního plynu a elektřiny [Ex-Post Analysis of Solid Fuels, Natural Gas and Electricity Taxation Introduction]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2013(1), pages 46-66.
    11. Adrien Vogt‐Schilb & Stephane Hallegatte, 2017. "Climate policies and nationally determined contributions: reconciling the needed ambition with the political economy," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(6), November.
    12. Maruf Rahman Maxim, 2020. "Environmental fiscal reform and the possibility of triple dividend in European and non-European countries: evidence from a meta-regression analysis," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 22(4), pages 633-656, October.
    13. Heinz Welsch & Viola Ehrenheim, 2004. "Environmental fiscal reform in Germany: a computable general equilibrium analysis," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 6(3), pages 197-219, September.
    14. Cathal ODonoghue & Beenish Amjad & Jules Linden & Nora Lustig & Denisa Sologon & Yang Wang, 2023. "The Distributional Impact of Inflation in Pakistan: A Case Study of a New Price Focused Microsimulation Framework, PRICES," Papers 2310.00231, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    15. Heindl, Peter & Löschel, Andreas, 2015. "Social implications of green growth policies from the perspective of energy sector reform and its impact on households," ZEW Discussion Papers 15-012, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    16. Ekins, Paul & Pollitt, Hector & Barton, Jennifer & Blobel, Daniel, 2011. "The implications for households of environmental tax reform (ETR) in Europe," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(12), pages 2472-2485.
    17. Anthony Letsoalo & James Blignaut & Theuns de Wet & Martin de Wit & Sebastiaan Hess & Richard S.J. Tol & Jan van Heerden, 2005. "Triple Dividends Of Water Consumption Charges In South Africa," Working Papers FNU-62, Research unit Sustainability and Global Change, Hamburg University, revised Apr 2005.
    18. WISSEMA Wiepke MATTHEWS Alan, 2010. "Modelling Climate Change Policy in Ireland: A CGE Approach," EcoMod2003 330700153, EcoMod.
    19. Nikodinoska, Dragana & Schröder, Carsten, 2016. "On the emissions–inequality and emissions–welfare trade-offs in energy taxation: Evidence on the German car fuels tax," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 206-233.
    20. Agnolucci, Paolo, 2009. "The effect of the German and British environmental taxation reforms: A simple assessment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 3043-3051, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    CO2-Emissionen; Prognose; PHANTA RHEI; Input-Output;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gws:dpaper:03-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: GWS mbH (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gwsosde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.