IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gta/workpp/6511.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cutting Russia’s Fossil Fuel Exports: Short-Term Pain for Long-Term Gain

Author

Listed:
  • Chepeliev, Maksym
  • Thomas Hertel
  • Dominique van der Mensbrugghe

Abstract

In response to the invasion of Ukraine, most OECD countries have announced punishing sanctions against Russia. In addition to targeting financial markets and service sectors, some countries have begun to impose restrictions on exports of Russia’s fossil fuels. In this paper, we analyze a scenario whereby most OECD countries put major restrictions on Russia’s energy exports. Results suggest that the short-term implications are likely to be non-trivial for EU – Russia’s largest energy export destination. Households’ real income could drop by 0.7-1.7 percent (relative to the reference case) with energy prices growing by as much as 11 percent. But after the initial adjustment period, the cost of such restrictions for the EU is expected to be more modest over the longer run (0.04 percent slowdown in the annual growth rate of real income over the 2022-2030 period), even as they lead to substantial environmental co-benefits through reductions in CO2 (6.6 percent in 2030) and air pollutant emissions (2.8-5.9 percent in 2030). Such emission reductions would take the EU more than halfway to its Green Deal mitigation target, reducing the necessary carbon price by around 40 EUR per tCO2. Adverse impacts on the Russian economy would be overwhelming and, in relative terms, 10 time larger than that for EU. By 2030 the cumulative reduction in Russian real income would exceed 1.1 trillion USD, while lost revenue from fossil fuel exports would be almost 1.4 trillion USD.

Suggested Citation

  • Chepeliev, Maksym & Thomas Hertel & Dominique van der Mensbrugghe, 2022. "Cutting Russia’s Fossil Fuel Exports: Short-Term Pain for Long-Term Gain," GTAP Working Papers 6511, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.
  • Handle: RePEc:gta:workpp:6511
    Note: GTAP Working Paper No. 91
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/res_display.asp?RecordID=6511
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hertel, Thomas & Hummels, David & Ivanic, Maros & Keeney, Roman, 2007. "How confident can we be of CGE-based assessments of Free Trade Agreements?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 611-635, July.
    2. Chepeliev, Maksym & Osorio-Rodarte, Israel & van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique, 2021. "Distributional impacts of carbon pricing policies under the Paris Agreement: Inter and intra-regional perspectives," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    3. Gallaway, Michael P. & McDaniel, Christine A. & Rivera, Sandra A., 2003. "Short-run and long-run industry-level estimates of U.S. Armington elasticities," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 49-68, March.
    4. Chepeliev, Maksym, 2020. "Development of the Air Pollution Database for the GTAP Data Base Version 10A," GTAP Research Memoranda 6163, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.
    5. Chepeliev, Maksym, 2020. "Development of the Non-CO2 GHG Emissions Database for the GTAP Data Base Version 10A," GTAP Research Memoranda 5993, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.
    6. Angel Aguiar & Maksym Chepeliev & Erwin L. Corong & Robert McDougall & Dominique van der Mensbrugghe, 2019. "The GTAP Data Base: Version 10," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 4(1), pages 1-27, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gabriel Felbermayr & Hendrik Mahlkow & Alexander Sandkamp, 2023. "Cutting through the value chain: the long-run effects of decoupling the East from the West," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 50(1), pages 75-108, February.
    2. Sigit Perdana & Marc Vielle & Maxime Schenckery, 2022. "European Economic impacts of cutting energy imports from Russia : A computable general equilibrium analysis," Post-Print hal-03887431, HAL.
    3. McWilliams, Ben & Sgaravatti, Giovanni & Tagliapietra, Simone & Zachmann, Georg, 2023. "How would the European Union fare without Russian energy?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    4. Lucia Tajoli, 2022. "Too much of a good thing? Russia-EU international trade relations at times of war," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 49(4), pages 807-834, December.
    5. Patrice Geoffron, 2022. "Confronting the gas crisis: Can we REPowerUE?," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(1), pages 5-15.
    6. Huda, Md Nazmul & Hossain, Sayed Mohammad Athar & Shaturaev, Jakhongir, 2023. "Effect of Commodity Exchange on the Economy- Prospects and Challenges," MPRA Paper 118331, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 14 Mar 2023.
    7. Simon Schropp & Marinos Tsigas, 2023. "Designing ‘optimal’ sanctions on Russian imports," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 498-531, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maksym Chepeliev & Thomas Hertel & Dominique van der Mensbrugghe, 2022. "Cutting Russia's fossil fuel exports: Short‐term economic pain for long‐term environmental gain," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(11), pages 3314-3343, November.
    2. Olekseyuk, Zoryana & Schürenberg-Frosch, Hannah, 2016. "Are Armington elasticities different across countries and sectors? A European study," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 328-342.
    3. Marilyne Huchet‐Bourdon & Esmaeil Pishbahar, 2009. "Armington Elasticities and Tariff Regime: An Application to European Union Rice Imports," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 586-603, September.
    4. McCleery, Robert & DePaolis, Fernando, 2014. "So you want to build a trade model? Available resources and critical choices," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 199-207.
    5. Axel Borrmann & Matthias Busse & Manuel De La Rocha, 2007. "Consequences of Economic Partnership Agreements between East and Southern African Countries and the EU for Inter- and Intra-regional Integration," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 233-253.
    6. Chepeliev,Maksym & Maliszewska,Maryla & Osorio-Rodarte,Israel & Seara E Pereira,Maria Filipa & Van Der Mensbrugghe,Dominique, 2022. "Pandemic Climate Mitigation, and Reshoring : Impacts of a Changing Global Economy on Trade, Incomes,and Poverty," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9955, The World Bank.
    7. Arita, Shawn & Beckman, Jayson & Mitchell, Lorraine, 2017. "Reducing transatlantic barriers on U.S.-EU agri-food trade: What are the possible gains?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 233-247.
    8. Xiang, Hongjin & Kuang, Yanxiang & Li, Chenhua, 2017. "Impact of the China–Australia FTA on global coal production and trade," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 65-78.
    9. Li, Minghao & Balistreri, Edward J. & Zhang, Wendong, 2020. "The U.S.–China trade war: Tariff data and general equilibrium analysis," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    10. Winchester, Niven & White, Dominic, 2022. "The Climate PoLicy ANalysis (C-PLAN) Model, Version 1.0," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    11. Kitetu, Geoffrey M. & Ko, Jong-Hwan, 2022. "United States Re-enters the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement: The Unexpected Twists and the Opportunity Costs? A CGE Approach," Conference papers 333503, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    12. Chepeliev, Maksym, 2020. "Development of the Air Pollution Database for the GTAP Data Base Version 10A," GTAP Research Memoranda 6163, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.
    13. Miguel, Carlos de & O'Ryan, Raúl & Pereira, Mauricio & Carriquiri, Bruno, 2009. "Energy shocks, fiscal policy and CO2 emissions in Chile," Conference papers 331817, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    14. Fournier Gabela, Julio G. & Freund, Florian, 2022. "Potential carbon leakage risk: A cross-sector cross-country assessment in the OECD area," Conference papers 333468, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    15. Hillberry, Russell & Hummels, David, 2013. "Trade Elasticity Parameters for a Computable General Equilibrium Model," Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, in: Peter B. Dixon & Dale Jorgenson (ed.), Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 1213-1269, Elsevier.
    16. Nin Pratt, Alejandro & Diao, Xinshen, 2008. "Exploring Growth Linkages and Market Opportunities for Agriculture in Southern Africa," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 23, pages 104-137.
    17. Troy Lorde & Antonio Alleyne, 2018. "Estimating the Trade and Revenue Impacts of the European Union–CARIFORUM Economic Partnership Agreement: A Case Study of Barbados," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(5), pages 1129-1151, October.
    18. Yao, Guolin & Hillberry, Russell, 2018. "Structural Gravity Model Estimates of Nested CES Import Demands for Soybeans," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274281, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Xiang, Hongjin & Kuang, Yanxiang & He, Hongbo & Yao, Shujie, 2022. "Could tariffs reduce overcapacity and environmental pollution? Evidence from China’s adjustment of tariffs on coal," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 129-144.
    20. Aguiar, Angel & Chepeliev, Maksym & Golub, Alla & Hertel, Thomas & Soderbery, Anson & van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique, 2020. "The role of trade elasticities in shaping uncertainty in CGE policy outcomes," Conference papers 333206, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gta:workpp:6511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jeremy Douglas (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.